“Now you know what you’re doing right and wrong!” Peer feedback quality in synchronous peer assessment in secondary education
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 27,815 · see citing works
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · see citing works
Shute, V. J. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307313795 · Cited by 4,631 · see citing works
The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543061002213 · Cited by 1,313 · see citing works
Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal
Sadler, D. R. (2010) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930903541015 · Cited by 1,138 · see citing works
Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective
Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.795518 · Cited by 966 · see citing works
A review of rubric use in higher education
Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H. (2010) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930902862859 · Cited by 917 · see citing works
Topping, K. J. (2009) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405840802577569 · Cited by 785 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Numerous studies on PA have shown various benefits for the learning process, such as improved student motivation and improved conceptual understanding, communication skills, and self-assessment skills (e.g., Falchikov and Goldfinch 2000; Topping 2009).”
BackgroundThe nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance
Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x · Cited by 602 · see citing works
Sustainable assessment revisited
Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133 · Cited by 576 · see citing works
Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions
van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2016) · The Enabling Power of Assessment · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_18 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Self-citationPanadero, E., Romero, M., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2013) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.005 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Self-citationCheng, K.-H., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2015) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.001 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Training teachers in peer-assessment skills: effects on performance and perceptions
Sluijsmans *, D. M. A., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Martens, R. L. (2004) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/1470329032000172720 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.019 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
What if pupils can assess their peers anonymously? A quasi-experimental study
Vanderhoven, E., Raes, A., Montrieux, H., Rotsaert, T., & Schellens, T. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.001 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bauer, E., Greisel, M., Kuznetsov, I., Berndt, M., Kollar, I., Dresel, M., Fischer, M. R., & Fischer, F. (2023) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13336 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., & Schellens, T. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0339-8 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Self-citationVattøy, K.-D., & Gamlem, S. M. (2024) · Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00313831.2023.2192772 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., Schellens, T., & Raes, A.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University (BE)
- Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Rotsaert, Tijs
- Venue
- European Journal of Psychology of Education
- Published
- 2017-02-16
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 255-275
- ISSN
- 0256-2928 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-5174
- OpenAlex
- W2588817198
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 11.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Journal of Psychology of Education (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Lirias (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ghent University (BOF13/24J/115)
- Ramón y Cajal (RYC-2013-13469)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
- Keywords
- peer assessment, synchronous feedback, feedback frequency, high school students, 11th grade
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
