Cited by 304Higher Education Research StudiesEducational Outcomes and InfluencesEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

First-year university students’ academic success: The importance of academic adjustment.

Open access
van Rooij, Els C. M., Jansen, Ellen P. W. A., van de Grift, Wim J. C. M.·2018·European Journal of Psychology of Education

Abstract

Considering the pivotal role of academic adjustment for student success, it is important to gain insight into how several motivational and behavioural factors affect academic adjustment and the extent to which academic adjustment influences student success. This empirical study investigated how intrinsic motivation, academic self-efficacy, self-regulated study behaviour and satisfaction with the chosen degree programme influenced academic adjustment in university and how these variables and adjustment affected three important indicators of student success: grade point average (GPA), attained number of credits (ECTS) and intention to persist. The sample consisted of 243 first-year university students in the Netherlands. Structural equation modelling showed that academic adjustment was influenced by intrinsic motivation, self-regulated study behaviour and degree programme satisfaction, which together explained 72% of the variance in adjustment. Motivational and behavioural variables did not influence GPA and credits directly but through academic adjustment. Furthermore, only satisfaction with the degree programme predicted intention to persist. These results point to the importance of academic adjustment in predicting university GPA and credits and the pivotal role of satisfaction with the degree programme in predicting intention to persist. Universities could integrate the development of self-regulated study skills—the biggest contributor to academic adjustment—in the first-year programme. Moreover, looking at the importance of students’ satisfaction with the programme, communication and collaboration between secondary schools and universities should be enhanced in order to help students to choose a university degree programme that matches their abilities, interests and values.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10212-017-0347-8

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Rooij, E. C. M., Jansen, E. P. W. A., & van de Grift, W. J. C. M.
Affiliations
University of Groningen (NL)
Venue
European Journal of Psychology of Education
Published
2017-11-04
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
749-767
ISSN
  • 0256-2928 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-5174
OpenAlex
W2766277735
Cited by
304
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
26.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Psychology of Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Groningen
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
academic adjustment, first-year students, academic performance, intrinsic motivation, academic self-efficacy, grade point average, ECTS credits, transition from secondary to university

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review