Cited by 2,479Higher Education Research StudiesEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessEducational Outcomes and Influences

Do Psychosocial and Study Skill Factors Predict College Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis.

Robbins, Steven B., Lauver, Kristy, Le, Huy, Davis, Daniel, Langley, Ronelle, Carlstrom, Aaron·2004·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between psychosocial and study skill factors (PSFs) and college outcomes by meta-analyzing 109 studies. On the basis of educational persistence and motivational theory models, the PSFs were categorized into 9 broad constructs: achievement motivation, academic goals, institutional commitment, perceived social support, social involvement, academic self-efficacy, general self-concept, academic-related skills, and contextual influences. Two college outcomes were targeted: performance (cumulative grade point average; GPA) and persistence (retention). Meta-analyses indicate moderate relationships between retention and academic goals, academic self-efficacy, and academic-related skills (ps =.340,.359, and.366, respectively). The best predictors for GPA were academic self-efficacy and achievement motivation (ps =.496 and.303, respectively). Supplementary regression analyses confirmed the incremental contributions of the PSF over and above those of socioeconomic status, standardized achievement, and high school GPA in predicting college outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261

Cites

194 of 194 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 200 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A.
Affiliations
  • ACT (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2004
Volume
130
Issue
2
Pages
261-288
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2106866721
Cited by
2,479
References
200
Citations by year
2026: 85 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 122 · 2023: 134 · 2022: 148 · 2021: 153 · 2020: 231 · 2019: 159 · 2018: 168 · 2017: 171 · 2016: 162 · 2015: 164 · 2014: 145 · 2013: 133 · 2012: 107
FWCI
22.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
Keywords
psychosocial factors, study skills, college outcomes, academic self-efficacy, achievement motivation, academic goals, student retention, grade point average, institutional commitment, perceived social support, social engagement, self-concept, student performance prediction
MeSH terms
Educational Status, Humans, Learning, Psychology, Retention, Psychology, Social Support, Universities, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review