Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-Term Safety of Spironolactone in Acne: Results of an 8-Year Followup Study

Shaw, James C., White, Lucile E.·2002·Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery

Abstract

Background: Spironolactone has been used for over 20 years as an antiandrogen in the treatment of acne and hirsutism. No long-term studies of the safety of spironolactone used in this manner have been published. We present a study of the long-term safety and tolerance of spironolactone in 91 women with acne who were followed for up to 8 years. Methods: A survey questionnaire was sent to 210 patients, and a comparison chart review of all patients to whom the survey was sent was made. Results: Ninety-one completed surveys were analyzed, comprising 506 person-years of followup and 200 person-years of spironolactone exposure. Mean treatment length was 28.5 months (range = 0.5–122 months). During the 8-year followup period, there were no cases of serious illness attributable to spironolactone use. Side effects were present in 59% and resulted in cessation of the drug in 15%. Diuretic effect and menstrual irregularities were the most common adverse effects. Conclusions: After 200 person-years of exposure to spironolactone and 506 person-years of followup over 8 years, no serious illnesses thought to be attributed to spironolactone were reported. The long-term use of spironolactone in the treatment of acne in women appears to be safe. Side effects, however, are common, although not usually a cause for stopping the drug.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/120347540200600604

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Lee O, 2000, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2, CD000194
  2. Loube SD, 1975, Breast cancer associated with administration of Spironolactone [letter], 1, 1428
  3. Barker DJP, 1987, J Drug Dev, 1, 22

Cited by

See all 86

Metadata

Authors
Shaw, J. C., & White, L. E.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery
Published
2002-11
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
541-545
ISSN
  • 1203-4754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-7109
OpenAlex
W2050783070
Cited by
86
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
spironolactone, acne, long-term drug safety, adverse drug reactions, antiandrogen therapy, women, diuretic effect, menstrual irregularity, drug tolerance
MeSH terms
Acne Vulgaris, Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists, Data Collection, Diuresis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Menstruation Disturbances, Surveys and Questionnaires, Safety, Spironolactone, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Safety of Spironolactone in Acne: Results of an 8-Year Followup Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/120347540200600604
The paper
Shaw, J. C., & White, L. E. (2002). Long-Term Safety of Spironolactone in Acne: Results of an 8-Year Followup Study. Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1177/120347540200600604

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.