Cited by 74Usability and User Interface DesignAdvanced Software Engineering MethodologiesWeb Applications and Data Management

Model-based intelligent user interface adaptation: challenges and future directions

Open access
Abrahão, Silvia, Insfran, Emilio, Sluÿters, Arthur, Vanderdonckt, Jean·2021·Software and Systems Modeling

Abstract

Adapting the user interface of a software system to the requirements of the context of use continues to be a major challenge, particularly when users become more demanding in terms of adaptation quality. A considerable number of methods have, over the past three decades, provided some form of modelling with which to support user interface adaptation. There is, however, a crucial issue as regards in analysing the concepts, the underlying knowledge, and the user experience afforded by these methods as regards comparing their benefits and shortcomings. These methods are so numerous that positioning a new method in the state of the art is challenging. This paper, therefore, defines a conceptual reference framework for intelligent user interface adaptation containing a set of conceptual adaptation properties that are useful for model-based user interface adaptation. The objective of this set of properties is to understand any method, to compare various methods and to generate new ideas for adaptation. We also analyse the opportunities that machine learning techniques could provide for data processing and analysis in this context, and identify some open challenges in order to guarantee an appropriate user experience for end-users. The relevant literature and our experience in research and industrial collaboration have been used as the basis on which to propose future directions in which these challenges can be addressed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10270-021-00909-7

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The adaptability of User Interfaces requires an analysis of various dimensions that influence user interaction.

    “The adaptability of User Interfaces requires an analysis of various dimensions that influence user interaction.These dimensions address critical questions, such as what elements are adapted in the UI, when the adaptation occurs, and the extent of user control over the adaptation process (Oestreich et al. 2022;Abrahão et al. 2021).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Browne, D., Totterdell, P., Norman, M. (eds.): Adaptive User Inter- faces. Computers and People Series. Academic Press, London, UK (1990)
  2. Dieterich, H., Malinowski, U., Kuhme, T., Schneider-Hufschmidt, M.: State of the art in adaptive user interfaces. In: M. Schneider- Hufschmidt, T. Kuhme, U. Malinowski (eds.) Adaptive User Interfaces Principles and Practice, chap. 10, pp. 13-48. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam (1994). https://www.elsevier. com/books/adaptive-user-interfaces/schneider-hufschmidt/978- 0-444-81545-3
  3. Furtado, E., Furtado, V., Silva, W.B., Rodrigues, D.W.T., da Silva Taddeo, L., Limbourg, Q., Vanderdonckt, J.: An ontology-based method for designing multiple user interfaces. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Multiple User Inter- faces, MUI' 01 (2001). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 2567741_An_Ontology-Based_Method_for_Universal_Design_ of_User_Interfaces

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abrahão, S., Insfran, E., Sluÿters, A., & Vanderdonckt, J.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
  • UCLouvain (BE)
Corresponding author
Abrahão, Silvia
Venue
Software and Systems Modeling
Published
2021-07-16
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
1335-1349
ISSN
  • 1619-1366 (ISSN-L)
  • 1619-1374
OpenAlex
W3186895851
Cited by
74
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
FWCI
5.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Software & Systems Modeling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RiuNet (Universitat Politècnica de València) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS (40001931)
  • Generalitat Valenciana (AICO/2020/113)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (TIN2017-84550-R)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Applications and Data Management
Keywords
model-based adaptation, context-aware systems, user experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review