The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Low frequency power of heart rate variability reflects baroreflex function, not cardiac sympathetic innervation
Open accessAbstract
BackgroundPower spectral analysis of heart rate variability is used to assess cardiac autonomic function. The relationship of low frequency (LF) power to cardiac sympathetic tone has been unclear. We reported previously that LF power may reflect baroreflex modulation. In this study we attempted to replicate our findings in additional subject cohorts, taking into account possible influences of respiration and using different methods to measure baroreflex-cardiovagal gain (BCG).ObjectiveWe assessed relationships of LF power, including respiration-adjusted LF power (LFa), with cardiac sympathetic innervation and baroreflex function in subjects with or without neuroimaging evidence of cardiac sympathetic denervation.MethodsValues for LF power at baseline supine, seated, and during the Valsalva maneuver were compared between subject groups with low or normal myocardial concentrations of 6-[18F]fluorodopamine-derived radioactivity. BCG was calculated from the slope of cardiac interbeat interval vs. systolic pressure during Phase II of the Valsalva maneuver or after i.v. nitroglycerine injection (the Oxford technique).ResultsLF and LFa were unrelated to myocardial 6-[18F]fluorodopamine-derived radioactivity. During sitting rest and the Valsalva maneuver logs of LF and LFa correlated positively with the log of Phase II BCG (r = 0.61, p = 0.0005; r = 0.47, p = 0.009; r = 0.69, p < 0.0001; r = 0.60, p = 0.0006). Groups with Low BCG (≤3 ms/mmHg) had low LF and LFa regardless of cardiac innervation. The log of LF power during supine rest correlated with the log of Oxford BCG (r = 0.74, p < 0.0001).ConclusionLF power, with or without respiratory adjustment, reflects baroreflex modulation and not cardiac sympathetic tone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Akselrod, S., Gordon, D., Ubel, F. A., Shannon, D. C., Berger, A. C., & Cohen, R. J. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6166045 · Cited by 5,079
Association between supine hypertension and orthostatic hypotension in autonomic failure
Goldstein, D. S., Pechnik, S., Holmes, C., Eldadah, B., & Sharabi, Y. (2003) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000081216.11623.c3 · Cited by 233
Self-citationMoak, J. P., Goldstein, D. S., Eldadah, B. A., Saleem, A., Holmes, C., Pechnik, S., & Sharabi, Y. (2007) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.07.019 · Cited by 203
Self-citationAlvarenga, M. E., Richards, J. C., Lambert, G., & Esler, M. D. (2006) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000195872.00987.db · Cited by 136
Cited by
Shaffer, F., McCraty, R., & Zerr, C. L. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01040 · Cited by 1,866
Reyes del Paso, G. A., Langewitz, W., Mulder, L. J. M., van Roon, A., & Duschek, S. (2013) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12027 · Cited by 954
Goldstein, D. S., Bentho, O., Park, M.-Y., & Sharabi, Y. (2011) · Experimental Physiology · doi:10.1113/expphysiol.2010.056259 · Cited by 846
Self-citationConsiderations in the assessment of heart rate variability in biobehavioral research
Quintana, D. S., & Heathers, J. A. J. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00805 · Cited by 395
Pitfalls of assessment of autonomic function by heart rate variability
Hayano, J., & Yuda, E. (2019) · Journal of Physiological Anthropology · doi:10.1186/s40101-019-0193-2 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Rahman, F., Pechnik, S., Gross, D., Sewell, L., & Goldstein, D. S.
- Venue
- Clinical Autonomic Research
- Published
- 2011-01-29
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 133-141
- ISSN
- 0959-9851 (ISSN-L)
- 1619-1560
- OpenAlex
- W1975517878
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.