The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New horizons in EU–Japan security cooperation
Open accessAbstract
Alongside the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA), a Strategic Partnership Agreement (SPA) between the EU and Japan entered into force in 2019. Whereas the EPA enshrines the existing interconnectedness between the Japanese and European economies, the SPA remains more aspirational. With an emphasis on shared norms and values and recognising an increasingly hostile external environment, the EU and Japan are seeking to deepen and broaden their security cooperation. For the period 1990-2017, EU-Japan security cooperation is mapped for a broad range of security domains. During this period, cooperation has increased notably in domains such as economic security, cyber-security and civil protection. In other areas, such as military, regional, energy and human security as well as terrorism, the scope of cooperation lags behind. Looking forward, the SPA not only reflects a renewed interest and level of ambition in the EU and Japan but also provides them with a platform to extend security cooperation to address their global and regional challenges.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Towards a Substantial EU-Japan Partnership
de Prado, C. (2017) · European Foreign Affairs Review · doi:10.54648/eerr2017034 · Cited by 11
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Akutsu H, Duke S (2019) EU–Japan military relations. In: Kirchner E, Dorussen H (eds) EU–Japan security cooperation. Routledge, London and New York, pp 37–55
- Baldauff N (2018) Japan’s free and open Indo-Pacific strategy: what does it mean for the EU? Egmont security policy brief no 100. Royal Institute for International Relations, Brussels
- Bossong R, Bothe S (2019) The EU and Japan in the fight against terrorism and organized crime. In: Kirchner EJ, Dorussen H (eds) EU–Japan security cooperation. Routledge, London and New York, pp 74–92
- Casarini N, Tsuruoka M (2019) Non-proliferation. In: Kirchner EJ, Dorussen H (eds) EU–Japan security cooperation. Routledge, London and New York, pp 56–73
- Economist, the (2018) Japan and the United States: watching him nervously, 8 September, pp. 449–450
- Gale A, Tsuneoka C (2018) Japan unifies its Army command. The Wall Street Journal, Thursday 5 April
- Gilson J (2016) The strategic partnership agreement between the EU and Japan: the pitfalls of path dependency. J Eur Integr 38:791–806 · DOI · Paper page
- Kirchner, EJ, Dorussen H (eds) (2019) EU-Japan security cooperation. Trends and prospects. Routledge, London and New York · DOI
- Kirchner EJ, Fanoulis E, Dorussen H, (2014) Civil security in the EU: national persistence versus EU ambitions?. Eur Secur 24(2):287–303 · DOI
- Most BA, Starr H (1989) Inquiry, logic, and international politics. University of South Carolina, Columbia
- Russett B, Oneal JR (2001) Triangulating peace: democracy, interdependence and international organizations. W.W. Norton, New York
- Samuels RJ, Wallace C (2018) Introduction: Japan’s pivot in Asia. Int Aff 94:703–710 · DOI
- Suzuki S, Wallace C (2018) Explaining Japan’s response to geopolitical vulnerabilities. Int Aff 94:711–734 · DOI
- Tsuruoka M (2008) “Expectation deficit” in EU–Japan relations: why EU–Japan partnership cannot flourish. Curr Polit Econ Asia 17:107–126
- Vosse W (2018) EU–Japan security partnership in practice: the counter-piracy mission off the coast of Somalia. In: Vosse W, Midford P (eds) Japan’s new security partnerships. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp 219–235 · DOI
Cited by
Still being checked.
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirchner, E. J., & Dorussen, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Essex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Dorussen, Han
- Venue
- Asia Europe Journal
- Published
- 2020-07-16
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-41
- ISSN
- 1610-2932 (ISSN-L)
- 1612-1031
- PMC
- PMC7364734
- OpenAlex
- W3042811908
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 7.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Asia Europe Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Erasmus+ (574634-EPP-1-2016-1-UK-EPPJMO-PROJECT)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Politics and Security
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Political and Social Dynamics
- Keywords
- EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement, economic security, cybersecurity, civil protection, military cooperation, energy security, human security, counterterrorism, values and norms, transatlantic relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
