CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 42Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionLandfill Environmental Impact StudiesSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biochar promotes methane production during anaerobic digestion of organic waste

Open access
Xiao, Leilei, Lichtfouse, Eric, Kumar, P. Senthil, Wang, Quan, Liu, Fanghua·2021·Environmental Chemistry Letters
DOI 10.1007/s10311-021-01251-6

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10311-021-01251-6

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. Akhil D, Lakshmi D, Kartik A, Vo DVN, Arun J, Gopinath K (2021) Production, characterization, activation and environmental applications of engineered biochar: a review. Environ Chem Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01167-7 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Begum S, Anupoju G, Sridhar S, Bhargava S, Jegatheesan V, Eshtiaghi N (2018) Evaluation of single and two stage anaerobic digestion of landfill leachate: effect of pH and initial organic loading rate on volatile fatty acid (VFA) and biogas production. Bioresour Technol 251:364–373 · DOI
  3. Bruun E, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ibrahim N, Egsgaard H, Ambus P, Jensen P, Dam-Johansen K (2011) Influence of fast pyrolysis temperature on biochar labile fraction and short-term carbon loss in a loamy soil. Biomass Bioenergy 35:1182–1189 · DOI
  4. Cayuela M, Jeffery S, van Zwieten L (2015) The molar H: corg ratio of biochar is a key factor in mitigating N2O emissions from soil. Agr Ecosyst Environ 202:135–138 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Chen R, Jiang H, Li Y (2018) Caffeine degradation by methanogenesis: efficiency in anaerobic membrane bioreactor and analysis of kinetic behavior. Chem Eng J 334:444–452 · DOI
  6. Chen W, Wei R, Yang L, Yang Y, Li G, Ni J (2019) Characteristics of wood-derived biochars produced at different temperatures before and after deashing: their different potential advantages in environmental applications. Sci Total Environ 651:2762–2771 · DOI
  7. Cheng Q, Call D, Reyes de los F (2018) Amending anaerobic bioreactors with pyrogenic carbonaceous materials: the influence of material properties on methane generation. Environ Sci-Wat Res 4:1794–1806
  8. Cross A, Sohi S (2011) The priming potential of biochar products in relation to labile carbon contents and soil organic matter status. Soil Biol Biochem 43:2127–2134 · DOI
  9. Diao Z, Dong F, Yan L, Chen Z, Qian W, Kong L, Zhang Z, Zhang T, Tao X, Du J, Jiang D, Chu W (2020) Synergistic oxidation of bisphenol A in a heterogeneous ultrasound-enhanced sludge biochar catalyst/persulfate process: reactivity and mechanism. J Hazard Mater 384:121385 · DOI
  10. Fagbohungbe M, Herbert B, Hurst L, Ibeto C, Li H, Usmani S, Semple K (2017) The challenges of anaerobic digestion and the role of biochar in optimizing anaerobic digestion. Waste Manage 61:236–249 · DOI
  11. Feng K, Wang Q, Li H, Zhang Y, Deng Z, Liu J, Du X (2020) Effect of fermentation type regulation using alkaline addition on two-phase anaerobic digestion of food waste at different organic load rates. Renew Energ 154:385–393 · DOI
  12. Fidel R, Laird D, Thompson M, Lawrinenko M (2017) Characterization and quantification of biochar alkalinity. Chemosphere 167:367–373 · DOI
  13. Gao L, Goldfarb J (2019) Heterogeneous biochars from agriculture residues and coal fly ash for the removal of heavy metals from coking wastewater. RSC Adv 9:16018–16027 · DOI
  14. Gao M, Zhang L, Liu Y (2020) High -loading food waste and blackwater anaerobic co -digestion: maximizing bioenergy recovery. Chem Eng J 394:124911 · DOI
  15. Garcia-Mancha N, Monsalvo V, Puyol D, Rodriguez J, Mohedano A (2017) Enhanced anaerobic degradability of highly polluted pesticides-bearing wastewater under thermophilic conditions. J Hazard Mater 339:320–329 · DOI
  16. Gunarathne V, Ashiq A, Ramanayaka S, Wijekoon P, Vithanage M (2019) Biochar from municipal solid waste for resource recovery and pollution remediation. Environ Chem Lett 17:1225–1235 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Hao S, Zhu X, Liu Y, Qian F, Fang Z, Shi Q, Zhang S, Chen J, Ren Z (2018) Production temperature effects on the structure of hydrochar-derived dissolved organic matter and associated toxicity. Environ Sci Technol 52:7486–7495 · DOI
  18. He X, Yin H, Sun X, Han L, Huang G (2018) Effect of different particle-size biochar on methane emissions during pig manure/wheat straw aerobic composting: insights into pore characterization and microbial mechanisms. Bioresour Technol 268:633–637 · DOI
  19. He P, Zhang H, Duan H, Shao L, Lu F (2020) Continuity of biochar-associated biofilm in anaerobic digestion. Chem Eng J 390:124605 · DOI
  20. Hedges L, Gurevitch J, Curtis P (1999) The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80:1150–1156 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Huang J, Ma K, Xia X, Gao K, Lu Y (2020a) Biochar and magnetite promote methanogenesis during anaerobic decomposition of rice straw. Soil Biol Biochem 143:107740 · DOI
  22. Huang W, Lee D, Huang C (2020b) Modification on biochars for applications: a research update. Bioresour Technol 319(4):124100
  23. Jeffery S, Verheijen F, Kammann C, Abalos D (2016) Biochar effects on methane emissions from soils: a meta-analysis. Soil Biol Biochem 101:251–258 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Ji M, Zhou L, Zhang S, Luo G, Sang W (2020) Effects of biochar on methane emission from paddy soil: focusing on dom and microbial communities. Sci Total Environ 743:140725 · DOI
  25. Jiang Q, Chen Y, Yu S, Zhu R, Zhong C, Zhou H, Gu L, He Q (2020) Effects of citrus peel biochar on anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge and its direct interspecies electron transfer pathway study. Chem Eng J 398:125643 · DOI
  26. Keiluweit M, Nico P, Johnson M, Kleber M (2010) Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 44:1247–1253 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Larry H, Ingram O (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis. In Academic Press, Elsevier: New York 20: 369. https://www.elsevier.com/books/statistical-methods-for-meta-analysis/hedges/978-0-08-057065-5
  28. Li J, Xiao L, Zheng S, Zhang Y, Luo M, Tong C, Xu H, Tan Y, Liu J, Wang O, Liu F (2018) A new insight into the strategy for methane production affected by conductive carbon cloth in wetland soil: beneficial to acetoclastic methanogenesis instead of CO2 reduction. Sci Total Environ 643:1024–1030 · DOI
  29. Lim E, Tian H, Chen Y, Ni K, Zhang J, Tong Y (2020) Methanogenic pathway and microbial succession during start-up and stabilization of thermophilic food waste anaerobic digestion with biochar. Bioresour Technol 314:123751 · DOI
  30. Lorentz K, Lal R (2014) Biochar application to soil for climate change mitigation by soil organic carbon sequestration. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 177:651–670 · DOI
  31. Lu C, Shen Y, Li C, Zhu N, Yuan H (2020a) Redox-active biochar and conductive graphite stimulate methanogenic metabolism in anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: beyond the direct interspecies electron transfer. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8(33):12626–12636 · DOI
  32. Lu J, Chen C, Huang C, Zhuang H, Lee D (2020b) Dark fermentation production of volatile fatty acids from glucose with biochar amended biological consortium. Bioresour Technol 303:122921 · DOI
  33. Luo C, Lu F, Shao L, He P (2015) Application of eco-compatible biochar in anaerobic digestion to relieve acid stress and promote the selective colonization of functional microbes (vol 68, pg 710, 2014). Water Res 70:496–496 · DOI
  34. Ma W, Li H, Zhang W, Shen C, Wang L, Li Y, Li Q, Wang Y (2020) TiO2 nanoparticles accelerate methanogenesis in mangrove wetlands sediment. Sci Total Environ 713:136602 · DOI
  35. Ma J, Chen F, Xue S, Pan J, Khoshnevisan B, Yang Y, Liu H, Qiu L (2021) Improving anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under optimized biochar supplementation strategies. Bioresour Technol 325(1):124697 · DOI
  36. Madigou C, Le Cao K, Bureau C, Mazeas L, Dejean S, Chapleur O (2019) Ecological consequences of abrupt temperature changes in anaerobic digesters. Chem Eng J 361:266–277 · DOI
  37. Mao C, Zhang T, Wang X, Feng Y, Ren G, Yang G (2017) Process performance and methane production optimizing of anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure and corn straw. Sci Rep-Uk 7:9379 · DOI
  38. Martins G, Salvador A, Pereira L, Alves M (2018) Methane production and conductive materials: a critical review. Environ Sci Technol 2:10241–10253 · DOI
  39. Masebinu S, Akinlabi E, Muzenda E, Aboyade A (2019) A review of biochar properties and their roles in mitigating challenges with anaerobic digestion. Renew Sust Energ Rev 103:291–307 · DOI
  40. Meng L, Xie L, Suenaga T, Riya S, Terada A, Hosomi M (2020) Eco-compatible biochar mitigates volatile fatty acids stress in high load thermophilic solid-state anaerobic reactors agricultural treating waste. Bioresour Technol 309:123366 · DOI
  41. Qiu L, Deng Y, Wang F, Davaritouchaee M, Yao Y (2019) A review on biochar-mediated anaerobic digestion with enhanced methane recovery. Renew Sust Energ Rev 115:109373 · DOI
  42. Rasapoor M, Young B, Asadov A, Brar R, Sarmah A, Zhuang W, Baroutian S (2020) Effects of biochar and activated carbon on biogas generation: a thermogravimetric and chemical analysis approach. Energ Convers Manag 203:112221 · DOI
  43. Regkouzas P, Diamadopoulos E (2019) Adsorption of selected organic micro-pollutants on sewage sludge biochar. Chemosphere 224:840–851 · DOI
  44. Shen Y, Linville J, Ignacio-de Leon P, Schoene R, Urgun-Demirtas M (2016) Towards a sustainable paradigm of waste-to-energy process: enhanced anaerobic digestion of sludge with woody biochar. J Clean Prod 135:1054–1064 · DOI
  45. Singh S, Kumar V, Dhanjal D, Datta S, Bhatia D, Dhiman J, Samuel J, Prasad R, Singh J (2020) A sustainable paradigm of sewage sludge biochar: valorization, opportunities, challenges and future prospects. J Clean Prod 269:122259 · DOI
  46. Tang S, Wang Z, Liu Z, Zhang Y, Si B (2020) The role of biochar to enhance anaerobic digestion: a review. J Renew Mater 8:1033–1052 · DOI
  47. Van Steendam C, Smets I, Skerlos S, Raskin L (2019) Improving anaerobic digestion via direct interspecies electron transfer requires development of suitable characterization methods. Curr Opin Biotechnol 57:183–190 · DOI
  48. Viggi C, Simonetti S, Palma E, Pagliaccia P, Braguglia C, Fazi S, Baronti S, Navarra M, Pettiti I, Koch C, Harnisch F, Aulenta F (2017) Enhancing methane production from food waste fermentate using biochar: the added value of electrochemical testing in pre-selecting the most effective type of biochar. Biotechnol Biofuels 10:303 · DOI
  49. Wang W, Lee D (2021) Direct interspecies electron transfer mechanism in enhanced methanogenesis: a mini-review. Bioresour Technol 330:124980 · DOI
  50. Wang H, Xiao K, Yang J, Yu Z, Yu W, Xu Q, Wu Q, Liang S, Hu J, Hou H, Liu B (2020) Phosphorus recovery from the liquid phase of anaerobic digestate using biochar derived from iron-rich sludge: a potential phosphorus fertilizer. Water Res 174:115629 · DOI
  51. Xiao L, Liu F, Liu J, Li J, Zhang Y, Yu J, Wang O (2018) Nano-Fe3O4 particles accelerating electromethanogenesis on an hour-long timescale in wetland soil. Environ Sci-Nano 5:436–445 · DOI
  52. Xiao L, Liu F, Xu H, Feng D, Liu J, Han G (2019a) Biochar promotes methane production at high acetate concentrations in anaerobic soils. Environ Chem Lett 17:1347–1352 · DOI
  53. Xiao L, Sun R, Zhang P, Zheng S, Tan Y, Li J, Zhang Y, Liu F (2019b) Simultaneous intensification of direct acetate cleavage and CO2 reduction to generate methane by bioaugmentation and increased electron transfer. Chem Eng J 378:122229 · DOI
  54. Xiao L, Wei W, Luo M, Xu H, Feng D, Yu J, Huang J, Liu F (2019c) A potential contribution of a Fe(III)-rich red clay horizon to methane release: biogenetic magnetite-mediated methanogenesis. CATENA 181:104081 · DOI
  55. Xiao L, Zheng S, Lichtfouse E, Luo M, Tan Y, Liu F (2020a) Carbon nanotubes accelerate acetoclastic methanogenesis: from pure cultures to anaerobic soils. Soil Biol Biochem 150:107938 · DOI
  56. Xiao L, Liu F, Lichtfouse E, Zhang P, Feng D, Li F (2020b) Methane production by acetate dismutation stimulated by Shewanella oneidensis and carbon materials: an alternative to classical CO2 reduction. Chem Eng J 389:124469 · DOI
  57. Xiao L, Li J, Lichtfouse E, Li Z, Wang Q, Liu F (2021a) Augmentation of chloramphenicol degradation by Geobacter-based biocatalysis and electric field. J Hazard Mater 410:124977 · DOI
  58. Xiao L, Wang Y, Lichtfouse E, Li Z, Kumar S, Liu J, Feng D, Yang Q, Liu F (2021b) Effect of antibiotics on the microbial efficiency of anaerobic digestion of wastewater: a review. Front Microbiol 11:611613 · DOI
  59. Yuan J, Xu R, Zhang H (2011) The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Bioresour Technol 102:3488–3497 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Yuan H, Ding L, Zama E, Liu P, Hozzein W, Zhu Y (2018) Biochar modulates methanogenesis through electron syntrophy of microorganisms with ethanol as a substrate. Environ Sci Technol 52:12198–12207 · DOI
  61. Zhang J, Zhao W, Zhang H, Wang Z, Fan C, Zang L (2018) Recent achievements in enhancing anaerobic digestion with carbon-based functional materials. Bioresour Technol 266:555–567 · DOI
  62. Zhang L, Loh K, Zhang J (2019) Jointly reducing antibiotic resistance genes and improving methane yield in anaerobic digestion of chicken manure by feedstock microwave pretreatment and activated carbon supplementation. Chem Eng J 372:815–824 · DOI
  63. Zhang L, Lim E, Loh K, Ok Y, Lee J, Shen Y, Wang C, Dai Y, Tong Y (2020) Biochar enhanced thermophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste: focusing on biochar particle size, microbial community analysis and pilot-scale application. Energ Convers Manag 209:112654 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Xiao, L., Lichtfouse, E., Kumar, P. S., Wang, Q., & Liu, F.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Xiao, Leilei
  • Lichtfouse, Eric
ORCID
Venue
Environmental Chemistry Letters
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2021-05-08
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
3557-3564
ISSN
  • 1610-3653 (ISSN-L)
  • 1610-3661
DOI
10.1007/s10311-021-01251-6
OpenAlex
W3138248277
Cited by
42
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Environmental Chemistry Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Knowledge Repository of Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, CAS (Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (42077025)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
biochar, anaerobic digestion, biomethane production, methane yield, organic waste, pyrolysis temperature, feedstock type, greenhouse gas emissions, soil carbon sequestration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review