Cited by 213Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFire effects on ecosystemsSoil erosion and sediment transport

The molar H:Corg ratio of biochar is a key factor in mitigating N2O emissions from soil

Open access
Cayuela, M.L., Jeffery, S., van Zwieten, L.·2015·Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment

Abstract

A previously published meta-analysis of biochar impacts on soil N2O emissions by Cayuela et al. (2014) found a “grand mean” reduction in N2O emissions of 54±6% following biochar application to soil. Here we update this analysis to include 26 additional manuscripts bringing the total to 56 articles. The updated meta-analysis confirms that biochar reduces soil N2O emissions by 49±5% (mean±95% confidence interval). Importantly, this meta-analysis has sufficient data to investigate the impact of biochar under field conditions, showing a statistically significant lower average reduction in the field (28±16%) compared to controlled laboratory studies (54±3%). A key finding is the importance of the molar H:Corg ratio of biochar in determining mitigation of N2O. Biochars with a molar H:Corg ratio <0.3, indicative of a high degree of aromatic condensation, lowered N2O emissions by 73±7% while biochars with a molar H:Corg ratio >0.5 were less effective at 40±16%. Together with previously published information, our new results suggest that a key mitigation mechanism is linked to the degree of polymerization and aromaticity of biochar.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agee.2014.12.015

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biochar with a high H:Corg ratio over 0.3 is much less effective, lowering N2O emissions by 40 ± 16%.

    “In contrast, biochar with a high H:Corg ratio over 0.3 is much less effective (i.e., lowers ­ N 2 O emissions by 40 ± 16%) (Cayuela et al. 2015).”

    From Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality (2023) · cites this paper as Cayuela et al. 2015

  • Biochar with a high aromaticity possesses a H:Corg ratio below 0.3, which lowers N2O emissions by 73 ± 7% on average.

    “Biochar with a high aromaticity possesses a H:Corg ratio below 0.3, which lowers ­ N 2 O emissions by 73 ± 7% on average.”

    From Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality (2023) · cites this paper as Cayuela et al. 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cayuela, M. L., Jeffery, S., & van Zwieten, L.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Cayuela, M.L.
Venue
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
202
Pages
135-138
ISSN
0167-8809 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007318876
Cited by
213
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 6
FWCI
22.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • EPubDev Repository (submittedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
biochar, nitrous oxide emissions, aromaticity, degree of polymerization, laboratory versus field conditions, greenhouse gas emissions reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review