Prey preference of large carnivores in Anamalai Tiger Reserve, India
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Density of Bos gaurus in Anamalai Tiger Reserve in 2001-2004 was 12.3 (5.6-16.4, 95% CI) individuals/km2.
“12.3 (5.6-16.4,95% CI) in the Anamalai Tiger Reserve in 2001-2004 (Kumaraguru et al. 2011)”
From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Kumaraguru et al. 2011
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 49
- Authors
- Kumaraguru, A., Saravanamuthu, R., Brinda, K., & Asokan, S.
- Affiliations
- Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (IN)
- Bharathidasan University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Kumaraguru, Arumugam
- Venue
- European Journal of Wildlife Research
- Published
- 2010-11-26
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 627-637
- ISSN
- 0044-2887 (ISSN-L)
- 1612-4642
- 1439-0574
- OpenAlex
- W2062409029
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- European Journal of Wildlife Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Keywords
- prey selection, large carnivores, tiger, leopard, dhole, prey density, prey biomass, scat analysis, predator diet, wild boar, chital, sambar, carnivore conservation, tropical forests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
