The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prognosis After Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Surgery
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Anastomotic leakage is a major complication of colorectal surgery causing a significant increase in 30-day mortality. The long-term prognosis of anastomotic leakage is poorly documented. This study was designed to assess whether anastomotic leakage affects five-year survival and local recurrence. METHODS: A total of 5,173 patients were recruited to the Wessex Colorectal Cancer Audit during the period September 1991 to August 1995 (prospective data, 5-year follow-up). The effect of anastomotic leakage on five-year survival and local recurrence was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 1,834 patients underwent a curative resection with an anastomosis (anastomotic leak = 71; 3.9 percent): 30-day mortality: 18.3 percent in the leak group, and 3.5 percent in the nonleak group (P < 0.001); local recurrence: 19 percent in the leak group, and 9.8 percent in the nonleak group (P = 0.018). A total of 1,201 patients underwent colonic anastomosis (anastomotic leak = 31; 2.6 percent). There was no significant difference in local recurrence or five-year survival between the leak and nonleak groups. A total of 633 patients underwent rectal anastomosis (anastomotic leakage = 40; 6.3 percent): 30-day mortality: 10 percent in the leak group, and 2 percent in the nonleak group (P = 0.014); cumulative five-year estimate of local recurrence: 25.1 (95 percent confidence interval, 9.6-40.5) percent in the leak group, and 10.4 (95 percent confidence interval, 7.7-13) percent in the nonleak group (P = 0.007). Cumulative five-year estimate of overall survival: 52.8 (95 percent confidence interval, 36.1-69.4) percent in the leak group, and 63.9 (95 percent confidence interval, 59.9-67.9) percent in the nonleak group (P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: After rectal anastomosis, an anastomotic leak is associated with a significant increase in local recurrence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Artinyan, A., Orcutt, S. T., Anaya, D. A., Richardson, P., Chen, G. J., & Berger, D. H. (2015) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000000854 · Cited by 345
Tokunaga, M., Tanizawa, Y., Bando, E., Kawamura, T., & Terashima, M. (2013) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2720-9 · Cited by 337
Haito-Chavez, Y., Law, J. K., Kratt, T., Arezzo, A., Verra, M., Morino, M., Sharaiha, R. Z., Poley, J.-W., Kahaleh, M., Thompson, C. C., et al. (2014) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2014.03.049 · Cited by 323
The Burden of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leaks: an Evaluation of Clinical and Economic Outcomes
Hammond, J., Lim, S., Wan, Y., Gao, X., & Patkar, A. (2014) · Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11605-014-2506-4 · Cited by 270
Covering ileo- or colostomy in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma
Montedori, A., Cirocchi, R., Farinella, E., Sciannameo, F., & Abraha, I. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006878.pub2 · Cited by 246
Metadata
- Authors
- Branagan, G., & Finnis, D.
- Venue
- Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1021-1026
- ISSN
- 0012-3706 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089491052
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognosis After Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10350-004-0869-4
- The paper
- Branagan, G., & Finnis, D. (2005). Prognosis After Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Surgery. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0869-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.