The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Burden of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leaks: an Evaluation of Clinical and Economic Outcomes
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and economic burden associated with anastomotic leaks following colorectal surgery. METHODS: Retrospective data (January 2008 to December 2010) were analyzed from patients who had colorectal surgery with and without postoperative leaks, using the Premier Perspective™ database. Data on in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), re-admissions, postoperative infection, and costs were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses, and the propensity score matching (PSM) and generalized linear models (GLM). RESULTS: Of the patients, 6,174 (6.18 %) had anastomotic leaks within 30 days after colorectal surgery. Patients with leaks had 1.3 times higher 30-day re-admission rates and 0.8-1.9 times higher postoperative infection rates as compared with patients without leaks (P < 0.001 for both). Anastomotic leaks incurred additional LOS and hospital costs of 7.3 days and $24,129, respectively, only within the first hospitalization. Per 1,000 patients undergoing colorectal surgery, the economic burden associated with anastomotic leaks--including hospitalization and re-admission--was established as 9,500 days in prolonged LOS and $28.6 million in additional costs. Similar results were obtained from both the PSM and GLM for assessing total costs for hospitalization and re-admission. CONCLUSIONS: Anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery increase the total clinical and economic burden by a factor of 0.6-1.9 for a 30-day re-admission, postoperative infection, LOS, and hospital costs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer
Rullier, E., Laurent, C., Garrelon, J. L., Michel, P., Saric, J., & Parneix, M. (1998) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00615.x · Cited by 895
Reducing bias in a propensity score matched-pair sample using greedy matching techniques
Parsons, L. (2001) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 733
Bruce, J., Krukowski, Z. H., Al-Khairy, G., Russell, E. M., & Park, K. G. M. (2001) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01829.x · Cited by 727
Anastomotic Leaks After Intestinal Anastomosis: It??s Later Than You Think
Hyman, N., Manchester, T. L., Osler, T., Burns, B., & Cataldo, P. A. (2007) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000225083.27182.85 · Cited by 652
Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum
Karanjia, N. D., Corder, A. P., Bearn, P., & Heald, R. J. (1994) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800810850 · Cited by 574
Colonic Anastomotic Leak: Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Treatment
Kingham, P. T., & Pachter, L. H. (2009) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.10.015 · Cited by 519
The Impact of Complications on Costs of Major Surgical Procedures: A Cost Analysis of 1200 Patients
Vonlanthen, R., Slankamenac, K., Breitenstein, S., Puhan, M. A., Muller, M. K., Hahnloser, D., Hauri, D., Graf, R., & Clavien, P.-A. (2011) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e31821d4a43 · Cited by 506
McArdle, C. S., McMillan, D. C., & Hole, D. J. (2005) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.5054 · Cited by 480
Prognosis After Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Surgery
Branagan, G., & Finnis, D. (2005) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/s10350-004-0869-4 · Cited by 468
Multiple regression of cost data: use of generalised linear models
Barber, J., & Thompson, S. (2004) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1258/1355819042250249 · Cited by 404 · cited 2×
“(%) 1,528 (14) 1,172 (13) 356 (20) Others, No.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Hammond, J., Lim, S., Wan, Y., Gao, X., & Patkar, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1176-1185
- ISSN
- 1091-255X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977913367
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 5.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Burden of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leaks: an Evaluation of Clinical and Economic Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11605-014-2506-4
- The paper
- Hammond, J., Lim, S., Wan, Y., Gao, X., & Patkar, A. (2014). The Burden of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leaks: an Evaluation of Clinical and Economic Outcomes. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2506-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.