Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Safety and Efficacy of the Artificial Bowel Sphincter for Fecal Incontinence: Results from a Multicenter Cohort Study

Wong, Douglas W., Congliosi, Susan M., Spencer, Michael P., Corman, Marvin L., Tan, Patrick, Opelka, Frank G., Burnstein, Marcus, Nogueras, Juan J., Bailey, Randolph H., Devesa, Jose Manuel, Fry, Robert D., Cagir, Burt, Birnbaum, Elisa, Fleshman, James W., Lawrence, Mallory A., Buie, Donald W., Heine, John, Edelstein, Peter S., Gregorcyk, Sharon, Lehur, Paul Antoine, Michot, Francis, Phang, Terry P., Schoetz, David J., Potenti, Fabio, Tsai, Josephine Y.·2002·Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this trial was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and impact on quality of life of the Acticon trade mark artificial bowel sphincter for fecal incontinence. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial was conducted under a common protocol. Patients were evaluated with anal physiology, endoanal ultrasonography, a fecal incontinence scoring system, fecal incontinence quality of life assessment, and overall health evaluation. Patients with a fecal incontinence score of 88 or greater (scale, 1-120) were considered candidates for the study. Implanted patients underwent identical reevaluation at 6 and 12 months postimplant. RESULTS: One hundred twelve of 115 patients (86 females) enrolled were implanted. Mean age was 49 (range, 18-81) years. A total of 384 device-related or potentially device-related adverse events were reported in 99 enrolled patients. Of these events, 246 required no intervention or only noninvasive intervention. Seventy-three revisional operations were required in 51 (46 percent) of the 112 implanted patients. Infection rate necessitating surgical revision was 25 percent. Forty-one patients (37 percent) have had their devices completely explanted, of which 7 have had successful reimplantations. In patients with a functioning neosphincter, improvement in quality of life and anal continence was documented. Mean matched fecal incontinence scores in 63 patients at 6 months follow-up was improved from 105 preimplant to 51 postimplant. In 55 patients at 12 months follow-up, mean matched fecal incontinence scores were 105 preimplant 48 postimplant. A successful outcome was achieved in 85 percent of patients with a functioning device. Intention to treat success rate was 53 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Although morbidity and the need for revisional surgery are high, the artificial bowel sphincter can improve anal incontinence and quality of life in patients with severe fecal incontinence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10350-004-6381-z

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Wong, D. W., Congliosi, S. M., Spencer, M. P., Corman, M. L., Tan, P., Opelka, F. G., Burnstein, M., Nogueras, J. J., Bailey, R. H., Devesa, J. M., Fry, R. D., Cagir, B., Birnbaum, E., Fleshman, J. W., Lawrence, M. A., Buie, D. W., Heine, J., Edelstein, P. S., Gregorcyk, S., Lehur, P. A., Michot, F., Phang, T. P., Schoetz, D. J., Potenti, F., & Tsai, J. Y.
Venue
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
Published
2002-09
Volume
45
Issue
9
Pages
1139-1153
ISSN
0012-3706 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085732970
Cited by
267
References
2
FWCI
10.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Safety and Efficacy of the Artificial Bowel Sphincter for Fecal Incontinence: Results from a Multicenter Cohort Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10350-004-6381-z
The paper
Wong, D. W., Congliosi, S. M., Spencer, M. P., Corman, M. L., Tan, P., Opelka, F. G., Burnstein, M., Nogueras, J. J., Bailey, R. H., Devesa, J. M., Fry, R. D., Cagir, B., Birnbaum, E., Fleshman, J. W., Lawrence, M. A., Buie, D. W., Heine, J., Edelstein, P. S., Gregorcyk, S., . . . Tsai, J. Y. (2002). The Safety and Efficacy of the Artificial Bowel Sphincter for Fecal Incontinence: Results from a Multicenter Cohort Study. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6381-z

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.