Cited by 108Appendicitis Diagnosis and ManagementEmergency and Acute Care StudiesStreptococcal Infections and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of Delays on Perforation Risk in Adults with Acute Appendicitis

Kearney, D., Cahill, R. A., O'Brien, E., Kirwan, W. O., Redmond, H. P.·2008·Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study analyzed whether prehospital or in-hospital delay was the more significant influence on perforation rates for acute appendicitis and whether any clinical feature designated patients requiring higher surgical priority. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted over one year at a tertiary referral hospital without a dedicated emergency surgical theater. Admission notes, theater logbook, and the Hospital Inpatient Enquiry system were reviewed to identify the characteristics and clinical course of patients aged greater than 16 years who were operated upon for histologically confirmed acute appendicitis. RESULTS: One hundred and fifteen patients were studied. The overall perforation rate was 17 percent. The mean duration of symptoms prior to hospital presentation was 38.1 hours with the mean in-hospital waiting time prior to operation being 23.4 hours. Although body temperature on presentation was significantly greater in patients found to have perforated appendicitis (P < 0.05), only patient heart rate at presentation and overall duration of symptoms, but not in-hospital waiting time, independently predicted perforation by stepwise linear regression modeling. CONCLUSION: In-hospital delay was not an independent predictor of perforation in adults with acute appendicitis although delays may contribute if patients are left to wait unduly. Tachycardia at presentation may be a quantifiable feature of those more likely to have perforation and who should be given higher surgical priority.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10350-008-9373-6

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients presenting to the hospital more than 24 hours after onset of symptoms are at higher risk of perforated appendicitis.

    “it has been described that patients presenting to the hospital more than 24hrs after the onset of symptoms are at higher risk of suffering from perforated appendicitis. 9,10”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kearney, D., Cahill, R. A., O'Brien, E., Kirwan, W. O., & Redmond, H. P.
Affiliations
Cork University Hospital (IE)
Venue
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
Published
2008-12
Volume
51
Issue
12
Pages
1823-1827
ISSN
0012-3706 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057072643
Cited by
108
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
Keywords
acute appendicitis, appendiceal perforation, prehospital delay, in-hospital delay, surgical priority, tachycardia, fever, symptom duration, emergency surgery
MeSH terms
Adult, Appendectomy, Appendicitis, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Triage, Cohort Studies, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review