The Future of AI in Medicine: A Perspective from a Chatbot
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a notable scarcity of literature that evaluates the proficiency of Google's Bard and ChatGPT specifically in the field of endocrinology, diabetes, and diabetes technology.
“Nevertheless, there is a notable scarcity of literature that evaluates the proficiency of Google's Bard and ChatGPT specifically in the field of endocrinology, diabetes, and diabetes technology.7,8”
From The Scientific Knowledge of Bard and ChatGPT in Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Diabetes Technology: Multiple-Choice Questions Examination-Based Performance (2025) · cites this paper as [7]
The Author note discusses ChatGPT and its use to write a perspective on AI in medicine. Searches for Bard, endocrinology, diabetes technology, and studies evaluating chatbot proficiency found no passage addressing the claimed scarcity of literature. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9 · Cited by 1,806 · see citing works
Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries?
Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023) · Library Hi Tech News · doi:10.1108/lhtn-01-2023-0009 · Cited by 1,355 · see citing works
Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S., & Wang, Z. (2023) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24750 · Cited by 919 · see citing works
Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing?
Salvagno, M., Taccone, F. S., & Gerli, A. G. (2023) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2 · Cited by 827 · see citing works
ChatGPT - Reshaping medical education and clinical management
Khan, R. A., Jawaid, M., Khan, A. R., & Sajjad, M. (2023) · Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences · doi:10.12669/pjms.39.2.7653 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
AI for life: Trends in artificial intelligence for biotechnology
Holzinger, A., Keiblinger, K., Holub, P., Zatloukal, K., & Müller, H. (2023) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2023.02.001 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
ChatGPT: Applications, Opportunities, and Threats
Bahrini, A., Khamoshifar, M., Abbasimehr, H., Riggs, R. J., Esmaeili, M., Majdabadkohne, R. M., & Pasehvar, M. (2023) · 2023 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS) · doi:10.1109/sieds58326.2023.10137850 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence applications speed up scientific writing
Chen, T.-J. (2023) · Journal of the Chinese Medical Association · doi:10.1097/jcma.0000000000000900 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
The use of artificial intelligence to improve the scientific writing of non-native english speakers
Giglio, A. D., & Costa, M. U. P. D. (2023) · Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira · doi:10.1590/1806-9282.20230560 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
“2023;69(9):e20230560 ORIGINAL ARTICLE https://doi.”
BackgroundUsing ChatGPT in Medical Research: Current Status and Future Directions
Ruksakulpiwat, S., Kumar, A., & Ajibade, A. (2023) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s413470 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Singh, H., Tayarani-Najaran, M.-H., & Yaqoob, M. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13090924 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
“A good example of these capabilities is in the two recent papers published by the same author, in which the author has used the tool to write the paper, and where the author prompts ChatGPT with questions around the topic and presents the responses as part of the publication [16,17].”
MethodAli, K., Barhom, N., Tamimi, F., & Duggal, M. (2024) · European Journal of Dental Education · doi:10.1111/eje.12937 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Chatbots in Medicine: A Supplement, Not a Substitute
Altamimi, I., Altamimi, A., Alhumimidi, A. S., Altamimi, A., & Temsah, M.-H. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.40922 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Meo, S. A., Al-Masri, A. A., Alotaibi, M., Meo, M. Z. S., & Meo, M. O. S. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11142046 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
ChatGPT and medical education: a double-edged sword
Khairatun Hisan, U., & Miftahul Amri, M. (2023) · Journal of Pedagogy and Education Science · doi:10.56741/jpes.v2i01.302 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Chow, J. C. L., Wong, V., Sanders, L., & Li, K. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11172417 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Liu, X., Wu, J., Shao, A., Shen, W., Ye, P., Wang, Y., Ye, J., Jin, K., & Yang, J. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/51926 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
ChatGPT and Clinical Training: Perception, Concerns, and Practice of Pharm-D Students
Zawiah, M., Al-Ashwal, F., Gharaibeh, L., Abu Farha, R., Alzoubi, K., Abu Hammour, K., Qasim, Q. A., & Abrah, F. (2023) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s439223 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Meo, S. A., Al-Khlaiwi, T., AbuKhalaf, A. A., Meo, A. S., & Klonoff, D. C. (2025) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/19322968231203987 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
ChatGPT in pharmacy practice: disruptive or destructive innovation? A scoping review
Lima, T. D. M., Bonafé, M., Baby, A. R., & Visacri, M. B. (2024) · Scientia Pharmaceutica · doi:10.3390/scipharm92040058 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
King, M. R., Abdulrahman, A. M., Petrovic, M. I., Poley, P. L., Hall, S. P., Kulapatana, S., & Lamantia, Z. E. (2024) · Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering · doi:10.1007/s12195-024-00793-3 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- King, M. R.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Corresponding author
- King, Michael R.
- ORCID
- King, Michael R.
- Venue
- Annals of Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2022-12-26
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 291-295
- ISSN
- 0090-6964 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-9686
- OpenAlex
- W4312212221
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 114
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Annals of Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in healthcare, ChatGPT, large language models, scholarly publishing, natural language processing, diagnosis, personalized treatment
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Software
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
