The DOI matches its Crossref record; 311 of the 392 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Logic-based technologies for multi-agent systems: a systematic literature review
Open accessAbstract
Precisely when the success of artificial intelligence (AI) sub-symbolic techniques makes them be identified with the whole AI by many non-computer-scientists and non-technical media, symbolic approaches are getting more and more attention as those that could make AI amenable to human understanding. Given the recurring cycles in the AI history, we expect that a revamp of technologies often tagged as “classical AI”—in particular, logic-based ones—will take place in the next few years. On the other hand, agents and multi-agent systems (MAS) have been at the core of the design of intelligent systems since their very beginning, and their long-term connection with logic-based technologies , which characterised their early days, might open new ways to engineer explainable intelligent systems . This is why understanding the current status of logic-based technologies for MAS is nowadays of paramount importance. Accordingly, this paper aims at providing a comprehensive view of those technologies by making them the subject of a systematic literature review (SLR). The resulting technologies are discussed and evaluated from two different perspectives: the MAS and the logic-based ones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“However, across these diverse systems, early AI agents shared common limitations: they lacked self-learning, generative reasoning, and adaptability to unstructured or evolving environments.”
From AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Arrieta, A. B., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., García, S., Gil-López, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.10045 · Cited by 11,321 · cited 2×
“Public institutions have followed, too: for instance, the European Commission already invested 1.5 billion euros in AI for 2018–2020, and many more are planned beyond 2020.1 Furthermore, the “American Artificial Intelligence Initiative: Year One Annual Report”, delivered on February 2020 [334], witnesses the record am…”
BackgroundInfluentialBarredo Arrieta, A., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., Garcia, S., Gil-Lopez, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., et al. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012 · Cited by 10,423
The Logic of Scientific Discovery
Jason, G. (1988) · Encyclopedia of Research Design · doi:10.4135/9781412961288.n223 · Cited by 9,743
Performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering
Budgen, D., & Brereton, P. (2006) · International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/1134285.1134500 · Cited by 8,824 · cited 26×
“This is where SLR comes at a hand: by providing a technical tool to produce surveys that can be verified and reproduced, since it requires to make the methods used to build the survey explicit and repeatable.”
BackgroundInfluentialIntelligent agents: theory and practice
Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (1995) · The Knowledge Engineering Review · doi:10.1017/s0269888900008122 · Cited by 6,810 · cited 4×
“So, when including/excludingMAS technologies in/from our survey, we refer to the wellknown definition of agents by Wooldridge and Jennings [356], or, to a basically-equivalent”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFoundations of Logic Programming
Lloyd, J. (1984) · Symbolic Computation · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-96826-6 · Cited by 5,772
Phan, D. T. (1995) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-x · Cited by 5,300 · cited 9×
“ASPIC+ & Dung-o-Matic (2008) & TOAST (2012) Primary references: [348] Other references describing / exploiting the technology: [39,40] URL: http://tweetyproject.org/downloads/index.html http://toast.arg.tech http://www.arg-tech.org/index.php/projects/dung-o-matic MASperspective TheASPIC+ argumentation framework by Pra…”
MethodInfluentialSystematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering—A Systematic Literature Review
Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009 · Cited by 4,537 · cited 2×
“Most of the surveys around, however, while useful and interesting, typically suffer from the authors’ bias [206], in particular when large research topics are addressed: as such, they typically fail in the essential aspects of reproducibility that should characterise any scientific work [291].”
BackgroundHolzmann, G. (1997) · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. · doi:10.1109/32.588521 · Cited by 4,531 · cited 2×
“Table 4 Main technologies excluded from the survey, along with the motivation spanning between (i) “general purpose”, (ii) “no logic”, (iii) “technology not found” Motivation for exclusion Technology General purpose 4QL [243], CCALC [163], CDF-Rules [164], Clingo [292], DR-Prolog [37], Inter4QL [199], InterProlog [62]…”
BackgroundPellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner
Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Grau, B. C., Kalyanpur, A., & Katz, Y. (2007) · Journal of Web Semantics · doi:10.1016/j.websem.2007.03.004 · Cited by 3,376 · cited 2×
“Table 4 Main technologies excluded from the survey, along with the motivation spanning between (i) “general purpose”, (ii) “no logic”, (iii) “technology not found” Motivation for exclusion Technology General purpose 4QL [243], CCALC [163], CDF-Rules [164], Clingo [292], DR-Prolog [37], Inter4QL [199], InterProlog [62]…”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 63
- Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Patel-Schneider, P., & Nardi, D. (Eds.). (2003). The description logic handbook: Theory, implementation, and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Baldoni, M., & Endriss, U. (Eds.). (2006). Declarative agent languages and technologies IV, Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 4327). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/11961536. · DOI
- Baldoni, M., Endriss, U., Omicini, A., & Torroni, P. (Eds.). (2005). Declarative agent languages and technologies III, Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 3904). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/11691792. · DOI
- Baldoni, M., Son, T. C., van Riemsdijk, B. M., & Winikoff, M. (Eds.). (2008). Declarative agent languages and technologies VI, Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 5397). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-93920-7. · DOI
- Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., & Marengo, E. (2010). Constraints among commitments: Regulative specification of interaction protocols. In W. Faber, & N. Leone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Italian conference on computational logic, Rende, Italy, July 7–9, 2010, CEUR workshop proceedings (Vol. 598). https://CEUR-WS.org. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-598/paper04.pdf.
- Bryant, R. E. (1986). Graph-based algorithms for Boolean function manipulation. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 35(8), 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.1986.1676819. · DOI
- Cattell, R. G. G., & Barry, D. K. (Eds.). (2000). The object data standard: ODMG 3.0. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
- Chandy, K. M. (1988). Parallel program design: A foundation. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co. Inc.
- Chellas, B. F. (1980). Modal logic: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621192. · DOI
- Chesani, F., Mello, P., Montali, M., & Torroni, P. (2009). Verifying a-priori the composition of declarative specified services. In M. Baldoni, C. Baroglio, J. Bentahar, G. Boella, M. Cossentino, M. Dastani, et al. (Eds.), Multi-agent logics, languages, and organisations—Second international federated workshops, MALLOW’009, workshops proceedings, Turin, Italy (Vol. 494, pp. 14–21). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-494/.
- Ciampolini, A., Lamma, E., Mello, P., & Torroni, P. (1999). The dynamic composition of abductive agents in ALIAS. In A. Brogi & P. Hill (Eds.), 2nd International workshop on component-based software development in computational logic (COCL’99), Paris, France. http://www.di.unipi.it/~brogi/ResearchActivity/COCL99/proceedings/ciampolini.ps.
- Clark, K., Hengst, B., Pagnucco, M., Rajaratnam, D., Robinson, P., Sammut, C., et al. (2016). A framework for integrating symbolic and sub-symbolic representations. In S. Kambhampati (Ed.), 25th International joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI-16) (pp. 2486–2492). IJCAI/AAAI Press. http://www.ijcai.org/Abstract/16/354.
- Collier, R. W. (2002). Agent factory: A framework for the engineering of agent-oriented applications. PhD thesis, University College Dublin.
- da Silva, D. M., & Vieira, R. (2007). Argonaut: Integrating Jason and Jena for context aware computing based on OWL ontologies. In Workshop on agents, web services, and ontologies—Integrated methodologies (AWESOME’007), Durham, UK (p. 19).
- de Boer, F. S., Hindriks, K. V., van der Hoek, W., & Meyer, J. J. C. (2007). A verification framework for agent programming with declarative goals. Journal of Applied Logic, 5(2), 277–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2005.12.014. · DOI
- Dennis, L. A., & Farwer, B. (2008). Gwendolen: A BDI language for verifiable agents. In B. Löwe (Ed.), AISB 2008 Symposium on logic and the simulation of interaction and reasoning (Vol. 9, pp. 16–23). Aberdeen: The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour, University of Aberdeen.
- Di Stefano, A., & Santoro, C. (2003). eXAT: An experimental tool for programming multi-agent systems in erlang. In G. Armano, F. D. Paoli, A. Omicini, & E. Vargiu (Eds.), WOA 2003—Dagli oggetti agli agenti: sistemi intelligenti e computazione pervasiva, Pitagora Editrice Bologna, Villasimius, CA (pp. 121–127).
- Dix, J., Leite, J., Governatori, G., & Jamroga, W. (Eds.). (2010). Computational logic in multi-agent systems, Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 6245). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14977-1. · DOI
- Erol, K., Hendler, J. A., & Nau, D. S. (1994). HTN planning: Complexity and expressivity. In B. Hayes-Roth & R. E. Korf (Eds.), 12th National conference on artificial intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 1123–1128). Seattle, WA: AAAI Press/The MIT Press. http://www.aaai.org/Library/AAAI/1994/aaai94-173.php.
- Finger, M., Fisher, M., & Owens, R. (1993). MetateM at work: Modelling reactive systems using executable temporal logic. In Sixth international conference on industrial and engineering applications of artificial intelligence and expert systems. Edinburgh: Gordon and Breach Publishers.
- Fukuta, N., Ito, T., & Shintani, T. (2000). MiLog: A mobile agent framework for implementing intelligent information agents with logic programming. In Pacific Rim international workshop on intelligent information agents (pp. 113–123).
- Gabbay, D. (1987). Modal and temporal logic programming. In A. Galton (Ed.), Temporal logics and their applications (pp. 197–237). New York: Academic Press Professional, Inc. https://doi.org/10.5555/42251.42257. · DOI
- Garcia, A. J., & Simari, G. R. (2004). Defeasible logic programming: An argumentative approach. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 4(2), 95–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068403001674. · DOI
- Garcia-Serrano, A., Vioque, D. T., Carbone, F., & Mendez, V. (2003). FIPA-compliant MAS development for road traffic management with a knowledge-based approach: The TRACK-R agents. In Challenges open agent systems workshop, Melbourne, Australia.
- Håkansson, A., Nguyen, N. T., Hartung, R. L., Howlett, R. J., & Jain, L. C. (Eds.). (2009). Agent and multi-agent systems: Technologies and applications, Lecture notes in computer science, 3rd KES international symposium, KES-AMSTA 2009, Uppsala, Sweden, June 3–5, 2009. Proceedings (Vol. 5559). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01665-3. · DOI
- Halaç, T. G., Çetin, Ö., Ekinci, E. E., Erdur, R. C., & Dikenelli, O. (2009). Executing agent plans by reducing to workflows. In M. Baldoni, C. Baroglio, J. Bentahar, G. Boella, M. Cossentino, M. Dastani, et al. (Eds.), 2nd Multi-agent logics, languages, and organisations federated workshops (Vol. 494). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-494/ladspaper10.pdf.
- Henz, M., Smolka, G., & Würtz, J. (1993). Oz—A programming language for multi-agent systems. In R. Bajcsy (Ed.), 13th International joint conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 404–409). Chambéry: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
- Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, Cochrane book series. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470712184. · DOI · Paper page
- Hill, E. F. (2003). Jess in action: Java rule-based systems. Greenwich, CT: Manning Publications Co.
- Hjelmblom, M. (2008). Deontic action-logic multi-agent systems in Prolog. Tech. Rep. 30, Uppsala University, this report is originally a thesis work for degree of Master of Science in Computer Science at Uppsala University. The thesis was written and presented under the author’s former name, Magnus Blom.
- Hluchý, L., Laclavik, M., Balogh, Z., & Babik, M. (2006). Agentowl: Semantic knowledge model and agent architecture. Computers and Artificial Intelligence, 25(5), 421–439.
- Howden, N., Rönnquist, R., Hodgson, A., & Lucas, A. (2001). JACK intelligent agents—Summary of an agent infrastructure. In 2nd International workshop on infrastructure for agents, MAS, and scalable MAS.
- Inoue, K., Satohand, F., & Toni, K. (Eds.). (2006). Computational logic in multi-agent systems, Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 4371). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69619-3. · DOI
- Kakas, A. C., Kowalski, R. A., & Toni, F. (1992). Abductive logic programming. Journal of Logic and Computation, 2(6), 719–770. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/2.6.719. · DOI
- Kowalski, R. A. (1995). Logical foundations for multi-agent systems. In M. Alpuente & M. I. Sessa (Eds.), Conference on declarative programming, GULP-PRODE’95, Marina di Vietri, Italy (pp. 39–40).
- Lange, D. B., & Mitsuru, O. (1998). Programming and deploying Java Mobile Agents Aglets. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
- Leite, J. A., Omicini, A., Torroni, P., & Yolum, P. (Eds.). (2005). Declarative agent languages and technologies II, Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 3476). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/b136890. · DOI
- Leite, J. A., Son, T. C., Torroni, P., van der Torre, L., & Woltran, S. (Eds.). (2013). Computational logic in multi-agent systems, Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 8143). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9. · DOI
- Lillis, D., & Collier, R. W. (2010). ACRE: Agent communication reasoning engine. In O. Boissier, A. E. Fallah-Seghrouchni, S. Hassas, & N. Maudet (Eds.), Proceedings of the multi-agent logics, languages, and organisations federated workshops (MALLOW 2010), CEUR workshop proceedings (Vol. 627). https://CEUR-WS.org. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-627/lads_1.pdf.
- Lützenberger, M., Küster, T., & Konnerth, T. (2013). JIAC V—A MAS framework for industrial applications. In International conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems, IFAAMAS (pp. 1189–1190). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2485136.
- Martelli, M., Mascardi, V., & Zini, F. (1999). Specification and simulation of multi-agent systems in caselp. In M. C. Meo & M. V. Ferro (Eds.), Conference on declarative programming, AGP’99, L’Aquila (pp. 13–28).
- Mascardi, V., Demergasso, D., & Ancona, D. (2005). Languages for programming BDI-style agents: An overview. In 6th Workshop “From objects to agents” (WOA 2005) (Vol. 2005, pp. 9–15).
- Metakides, G., & Nerode, A. (1996). Foreword. In Studies in computer science and artificial intelligence (Vol. 13, pp. vii–ix). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-3542(96)80008-9. · DOI
- Motomura, S., Kawamura, T., & Sugahara, K. (2005). Maglog: A mobile agent framework for distributed models. In 17th IASTED PDCS international conference, Phoenix, AZ, USA (pp. 414–420). http://www.actapress.com/Abstract.aspx?paperId=22336.
- Nau, D., Cao, Y., Lotem, A., & Munoz-Avila, H. (1999). SHOP: Simple hierarchical ordered planner. In 16th International joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI 1999) (Vol. 2, pp. 968–973). Stockholm: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. https://www.ijcai.org/Proceedings/1999-2.
- Niewiadomski, A., Penczek, W., & Szreter, M. (2004). VerICS 2004: A model checker for real time and multi-agent systems. In International workshop on concurrency, specification and programming (CS&P’04) (Vol. 170, pp. 88–99). Humboldt-Univeristaet, Berlino, Informatik-Berichte.
- Nilsson, N. J. (2001). Teleo-reactive programs and the triple-tower architecture. Electronic Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 5(B), 99–110.
- Orgun, B., Dras, M., Cassidy, S., & Nayak, A. (2005). DASMAS: Dialogue based automation of semantic interoperability in multi agent systems. In T. Meyer & M. A. Orgun. (Eds.), Australasian ontology workshop (Vol. 58, pp. 75–82). Sydney: Australian Computer Society, Inc.
- Rao, A. S., & Georgeff, M. P. (1991). Asymmetry thesis and side-effect problems in linear-time and branching-time intention logics. In J. Mylopoulos & R. Reiter (Eds.), 12th International joint conference on artificial intelligence. Sydney, Australia, August 24–30, 1991 (pp. 498–505). Morgan Kaufmann. http://ijcai.org/Proceedings/91-1/Papers/077.pdf.
- Rao, A. S., & Georgeff, M. P. (1991). Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In J. F. Allen, R. Fikes, & E. Sandewall (Eds.), 2nd International conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning (KR’91) (pp. 473–484). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. https://doi.org/10.5555/3087158.3087205. · DOI
- Rao, A. S., & Georgeff, M. P. (1993). A model-theoretic approach to the verification of situated reasoning systems. In R. Bajcsy (Ed.), 13th International joint conference on artificial intelligence. Chambéry, France, August 28–September 3, 1993 (pp. 318–324). Morgan Kaufmann. http://ijcai.org/Proceedings/93-1/Papers/045.pdf.
- Roy, P. V., & Haridi, S. (1999). Mozart: A programming system for agent applications. In D. De Schreye (Ed.), International workshop on distributed and internet programming with logic and constraint languages, MIT Press, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA, Roy Van Peter, Haridi Seif, Skarmeas Nikolaos, Clark L. Keith, Maamar Zakaria and Brueckner A. Sven, part of International conference on logic programming (ICLP’99).
- Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2002). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach, 2nd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall/Pearson Education International. http://vig.prenhall.com/catalog/academic/product/1,4096,0137903952,00.html.
- Sadri, F., & Satoh, K. (Eds.). (2007). Computational logic in multi-agent systems, Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 5056). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88833-8. · DOI
- Shoham, Y. (1991). AGENT0: A simple agent language and its interpreter. In T. L. Dean & K. R. McKeown (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th national conference on artificial intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 704–709). AAAI Press/The MIT Press. http://www.aaai.org/Library/AAAI/1991/aaai91-110.php.
- Šišlák, D., Volf, P., Kopřiva, Š., & Pěchouček, M. (2008). AGENTFLY: A multi-agent airspace test-bed (demo paper). In 7th International joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, ACM, Estoril, Portugal (pp. 1665–1666). http://www.ifaamas.org/Proceedings/aamas08/proceedings/pdf/demo/AAMAS08_demo5.pdf.
- Snook, C., Butler, M., Edmunds, A., & Johnson, I. (2004). Rigorous development of reusable, domain-specific components, for complex applications. In J. Jurgens & R. France (Eds.), 3rd International workshop on critical systems development with UML, Lisbon, Portugal (pp. 115–129).
- Sycara, K., Lu, J., Klusch, M., & Widoff, S. (1999). Matchmaking among heterogeneous agents on the Internet. In AAAI spring symposium on intelligent agents in Cyberspace (pp. 22–24).
- Tarau, P. (1998). Jinni: A lightweight java-based logic engine for Internet programming. In K. Sagonas (Ed.), International workshop on implementation technology for programming languages based on logic, Manchester, UK (pp. 1–15).
- Toni, F. (2006). Multi-agent systems in computational logic: Challenges and outcomes of the SOCS project. In Toni and Torroni [340] (pp. 420–426). https://doi.org/10.1007/11750734_26. · DOI
- Toni, F., & Torroni, P. (Eds.). (2005). Computational logic in multi-agent systems, Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 3900). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/11750734. · DOI
- Wielemaker, J., Schrijvers, T., Triska, M., & Lager, T. (2012). SWI-Prolog. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 12(1–2), 67–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068411000494. · DOI
- Yen, J., Yin, J., Ioerger, T. R., Miller, M. S., Xu, D., & Volz, R. A. (2001). CAST: Collaborative agents for simulating teamwork. In B. Nebel (Ed.), 7th International joint conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 1135–1144). Seattle, WA: Morgan Kaufmann. http://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1642194.1642247. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges
Sapkota, R., Roumeliotis, K. I., & Karkee, M. (2026) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103599 · Cited by 671
“Multi-agent systems facilitated coordination among distributed entities, exemplified by auction-based resource allocation in supply chain management [16–18].”
Agent-Based Modeling in Economics and Finance: Past, Present, and Future
Axtell, R. L., & Farmer, J. D. (2025) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20221319 · Cited by 319
AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges
Sapkota, R., Roumeliotis, K. I., & Karkee, M. (2025) · SuperIntelligence - Robotics - Safety & Alignment · doi:10.70777/si.v2i3.15161 · Cited by 186
Tasmurzayev, N., Amangeldy, B., Иманбек, Б., Baigarayeva, Z., Imankulov, T., Dikhanbayeva, G., Amangeldi, I., & Sharipova, S. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25175272 · Cited by 62
“…have long understood that building effective AI agents requires integrating multiple disciplines, including formal logic, cognitive science, machine learning, and software engineering—so that these agents can not only make autonomous decisions but also behave reliably and explainably [114].”
Fifty Years of Prolog and Beyond
KÖRNER, P., LEUSCHEL, M., BARBOSA, J., COSTA, V. S., DAHL, V., HERMENEGILDO, M. V., MORALES, J. F., WIELEMAKER, J., DIAZ, D., ABREU, S., et al. (2022) · Theory and Practice of Logic Programming · doi:10.1017/s1471068422000102 · Cited by 40
“This is, for instance, what happened with the Multi-Agent System community, where Prolog and LP have been extensively exploited in the last decades as the technological or conceptual basis for tens of agent-oriented technologies (Calegari et al., 2021).”
BackgroundSelf-citationToward Semantic Communication Protocols: A Probabilistic Logic Perspective
Seo, S., Park, J., Ko, S., Choi, J., Bennis, M., & Kim, S. (2023) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2023.3288268 · Cited by 43
“4) Symbolic Artificial Intelligence: Related to our focus on logical relationships, learning logical relationships to represent expert knowledge has been traditionally embodied by the field of expert systems [29], multi-agent systems [30], and knowledge query manipulation language [31].”
BackgroundMutlag, A., Ghani, M. K. A., Mohd, O., Abdulkareem, K. H., Mohammed, M., Alharbi, M., & Al-araji, Z. (2023) · Physical Communication · doi:10.1016/j.phycom.2023.102109 · Cited by 34
RML: Theory and practice of a domain specific language for runtime verification
Ancona, D., Franceschini, L., Ferrando, A., & Mascardi, V. (2021) · Science of Computer Programming · doi:10.1016/j.scico.2021.102610 · Cited by 34
Self-citationNext Generation of Multi-Agent Driven Smart City Applications and Research Paradigms
Arora, A., Jain, A., Yadav, D., Hassija, V., Chamola, V., & Sikdar, B. (2023) · IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2023.3310528 · Cited by 32
Xiang, L.-Q., Tan, Y.-T., Shen, G., & Jin, X. (2021) · Engineering Construction and Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/ecam-01-2021-0038 · Cited by 31
A survey on applications of coalition formation in multi‐agent systems
Sarkar, S., Malta, M. C., & Dutta, A. (2022) · Concurrency and Computation · doi:10.1002/cpe.6876 · Cited by 27
Algorithm for dynamic distribution and load balancing in distributed cloud computing
Mochalov, V., Bratchenko, N., & Gosteva, D. (2024) · Modeling of systems and processes · doi:10.12737/2219-0767-2024-17-1-92-102 · Cited by 24
Governance of Autonomous Agents on the Web: Challenges and Opportunities
Kampik, T., Mansour, A., Boissier, O., Kirrane, S., Padget, J., Payne, T. R., Singh, M. P., Tamma, V., & Zimmermann, A. (2022) · ACM Trans. Internet Techn. · doi:10.1145/3507910 · Cited by 22
“, those that respond to stimuli without complex symbolic reasoning to reason about future actions) to deliberative ones (those that maintain a symbolic world model for reasoning about plans and decision making) [29].”
BackgroundOn the impact of fuzzy-logic based BDI agent model for cyber-physical systems
Karaduman, B., Tezel, B. T., & Challenger, M. (2023) · Expert systems with applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122265 · Cited by 19
Multi-agent based manufacturing: current trends and challenges
Pulikottil, T., Estrada-Jimenez, L. A., Rehman, H. U., Barata, J., Nikghadam-Hojjati, S., & Zarzycki, L. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation · doi:10.1109/etfa45728.2021.9613555 · Cited by 19
“Calegari et al [3] presented a systematic review of MAS but mainly focused on logical technologies.”
BackgroundTalk2Image: A Multi-Agent System for Multi-Turn Image Generation and Editing
Ma, S., Guo, Y.-H., Su, J.-H., Huang, Q.-H., Zhou, Z.-Q., & Wang, Y. (2025) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.06916 · Cited by 18
“Multi-agent systems (MAS) offer a promising alternative to address these limitations through task decomposition and collaboration (Calegari et al. 2021; Cardoso and Ferrando 2021).”
David, J., Coatane'a, E., & Lobov, A. (2023) · Journal of manufacturing systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.07.013 · Cited by 18
Symbolic knowledge injection meets intelligent agents: QoS metrics and experiments
Agiollo, A., Rafanelli, A., Magnini, M., Ciatto, G., & Omicini, A. (2023) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-023-09609-6 · Cited by 18
“As shown by recent surveys [7], it is quite common for the MAS community to represent knowledge and agents’ behaviours symbolically both at the conceptual and technological level—often relying upon computational logic [8].”
BackgroundSelf-citation2P-Kt: A logic-based ecosystem for symbolic AI
Ciatto, G., Calegari, R., & Omicini, A. (2021) · SoftwareX · doi:10.1016/j.softx.2021.100817 · Cited by 18
“AI [2,3]: CL has enabled the development of the former in the past, and it is now pushing the latter towards interpretability and explainability.”
BackgroundSelf-citationLupiyoadi, R., Pramesti, M., Ikhsan, R., Usman, L. H., Games, D., Kurniawan, & Fakhrorazi, A. (2025) · Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100673 · Cited by 17
Siatras, V., Bakopoulos, E., Mavrothalassitis, P., Nikolakis, N., & Alexopoulos, K. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13179540 · Cited by 17
Calvaresi, D., Ciatto, G., Najjar, A., Aydoğan, R., van der Torre, L., Omicini, A., & Schumacher, M. (2021) · EXTRAAMAS@AAMAS · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-82017-6_20 · Cited by 16
Self-citationBeyond Human and Machine: An Architecture and Methodology Guideline for Centaurian Design
Pareschi, R. (2024) · The Scientist · doi:10.3390/sci6040071 · Cited by 15
“These systems utilize various methodologies, including logical inference [38], game theory [39], bio-inspired algorithmic search [40], and machine learning [41].”
Liu, Q., Chen, C., & Chen, S.-B. (2022) · Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing · doi:10.3390/jmmp6060135 · Cited by 15
Rizinski, M., & Trajanov, D. (2025) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2025.069678 · Cited by 18
“This deliberative reasoning process makes BDI models suitable for applications requiring goal-oriented behavior and planning, such as sophisticated financial advisory systems or compliance monitoring agents that need to reason about regulatory obligations [90–93].”
Synergizing Logical Reasoning, Knowledge Management and Collaboration in Multi-Agent LLM SystemPreprint
Kostka, A., & Chudziak, J. A. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.02170 · Cited by 6
“The complex and opaque nature of LLMs makes it challenging to directly analyze and improve their behavior and outputs (Calegari et al., 2020).”
Yan, S.-S., Aly, A., Felemban, B., Gheisarnejad, M., Tian, M.-W., Khooban, M., Mohammadzadeh, A., & Mobayen, S. (2021) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics10243122 · Cited by 13
“In the study of MAGs, the relationship between agents can be described as a network topology [32].”
BackgroundAgentic AI systems in electrical power systems engineering: current state-of-the-art and challenges
Ghosh, S., & Mittal, G. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1814651 · Cited by 11
“Early agent-based systems (Calegari et al., 2021; Cardoso and Ferrando, 2021) focused on coordination and had limited problem-solving capabilities often within the bounds of predefined and narrow operational contexts.”
Ensuring Trustworthy and Ethical Behavior in Intelligent Logical Agents
Costantini, S. (2024) · Italian Conference on Computational Logic · doi:10.1093/logcom/exab091 · Cited by 11
Chen, C., & Lin, S.-C. (2025) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-025-02706-1 · Cited by 10
“These agents possess capabilities for environmental perception (Leal Filho et al., 2022), rea - soning, and control (Calegari et al., 2021), allowing them to actively collect and analyze environmental information and take corresponding actions (Seng et al., 2022).”
Becker, L. B., Silvestre, I. D. O., Hübner, J. F., & Fisher, M. (2025) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2025.104917 · Cited by 5
On using Theorem Proving for Cognitive Agent-oriented Programming
Jensen, A. B., Hindriks, K., & Villadsen, J. (2021) · International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.5220/0010349504460453 · Cited by 9
“(Calegari et al., 2020) recently reviewed logic-based technologies for MAS and provide a nice overview of the available, and actively developed, agent technologies including means of agent verification.”
Sadeeq, M., & Zeebaree, S. R. M. (2021) · 2021 7th International Conference on Contemporary Information Technology and Mathematics (ICCITM) · doi:10.1109/iccitm53167.2021.9677679 · Cited by 8
Explainable and Ethical AI: A Perspective on Argumentation and Logic Programming
Calegari, R., Omicini, A., & Giovanni Sartor, B. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77091-4_2 · Cited by 7
Self-citationEvaluating Theory of Mind and Internal Beliefs in LLM-Based Multi-agent Systems
Kostka, A., & Chudziak, J. A. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-09318-9_2 · Cited by 4
“Explainability and transparency are very critical as well [2].”
Bansod, P. B. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.01438 · Cited by 8
“Prior to the widespread availability of advanced foundation models, intelligent systems operated within highly constrained parameters, relying primarily on rule-based logic, symbolic reasoning, and predetermined response patterns [4], [5].”
Rational Coordination in Cognitive Agents: A Decision-Theoretic Approach Using ERMM
Mazhar, N., & Kausar, M. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3309417 · Cited by 7
An epistemic logic for formalizing group dynamics of agents
Costantini, S., Formisano, A., & Pitoni, V. (2022) · Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems · doi:10.1075/is.22019.cos · Cited by 8
Khapre, S., Mersha, M. A., Olalekan, Z., Shakil, H., Iskandar, S., Moustafa, A., & Kalita, J. K. (2026) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2026.134049 · Cited by 6
Design of Multi Agent Autonomous Workflow Systems using Agentic AI Frameworks
Apuri, H., & Yepuri, C. (2026) · 2026 International Conference on AI-Driven Smart Systems and Ubiquitous Computing (ICAUC) · doi:10.1109/icauc68182.2026.11441280 · Cited by 5
“Because agents in the BDI model can make choices regarding what they want and what they believe, this model has received the most focus and has become very popular in the construction of autonomous agents in both theoretical and applied robotics and distributed systems [1].”
Li, B. (2025) · International Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.4018/ijkm.370950 · Cited by 5
A Survey on Cooperative Control of Multi-Agent Systems
Yang, Z.-C., Ma, N., & Yao, Y. (2023) · 2023 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Human-Computer Interaction and Robotics (AIHCIR) · doi:10.1109/aihcir61661.2023.00090 · Cited by 5
“The collaborative efforts of multiple intelligent entities leverage their respective strengths to collectively accomplish complex tasks, thereby improving production efficiency and system performance in various domains[2].”
BackgroundMarzouk, R., Alzahrani, J. S., Alrowais, F., Al-Wesabi, F. N., & Hamza, M. A. (2022) · Expert Syst. J. Knowl. Eng. · doi:10.1111/exsy.13112 · Cited by 5
“IoA is a novel technique that emerged with an aim to mitigate the communication deficiency in terms of reasoning and social abilities found in IoT scenarios, with the help of software agents (Calegari et al., 2021).”
MethodTowards Verifying a Blocks World for Teams GOAL Agent
Jensen, A. B. (2021) · International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.5220/0010268303370344 · Cited by 5
“From a recent review of logic-based approaches for multi-agent systems by (Calegari et al., 2020), it is clear that model-checking has retained its position as the primary tool for practical verification of multi-agent systems.”
BackgroundAnalysing the Role of Multi-Agent AI Models for Autonomous Business Decision Systems
Tayal, C., Murumkar, S., & Biradar, S. S. (2026) · IEEE Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC) · doi:10.1109/ccwc67433.2026.11393746 · Cited by 4
“In multi-agent interactions, the use of logic-based systems can be supported in the literature to enforce contract, organisational norms, trace distributed decisions, and managing conflicts [2].”
Multi-agent systems for digital twin shop-floor resilient control
Zhang, C., Tao, F., Ma, X., & Cheng, Y. (2025) · Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cjme.2025.100206 · Cited by 5
Zhang, K., Dong, C.-Q., Guo, Y., Yu, G., & Mi, J.-N. (2025) · Syst. · doi:10.3390/systems13060451 · Cited by 4
“First, an MAS enables the representation of heterogeneous compu‑ tational intelligence across different agent types, reflecting the diverse cognitive models that shape discourse contributions [41].”
Logic-based Technologies for Multi-agent Systems: Summary of a Systematic Literature Review
Calegari, R., Ciatto, G., Mascardi, V., & Omicini, A. (2021) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.5555/3463952.3464214 · Cited by 4
“In the end, we forward the interested readers to the original SLR for the full details [7].”
MethodSelf-citationAguayo-Canela, F. J., Aláiz-Moretón, H., García-Ordás, M., Benítez-Andrades, J., Benavides, C., Novais, P., & García-Rodríguez, I. (2021) · Cluster Computing · doi:10.1007/s10586-021-03270-y · Cited by 4
“agent to sense its environment and trigger its behavior when a change is detected [7].”
BackgroundTesting BDI-based multi-agent systems using discrete event simulation
Baiardi, M., Burattini, S., Ciatto, G., & Pianini, D. (2026) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-026-09744-w · Cited by 3
“Depending on whether MASs were exploited to study systems’ complexity, or to tame it, many solutions have been proposed to either use MAS abstractions to simulate system behaviour [5] or for designing and deploying real-world systems [6].”
Self-citationFAIR: Fuzzy-BDI agents for intelligent reasoning on smart cyber-physical systems
Karaduman, B., Tezel, B. T., & Challenger, M. (2025) · Expert systems with applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.130047 · Cited by 3
Blending BDI Agents with Object-Oriented and Functional Programming with JaKtA
Baiardi, M., Burattini, S., Ciatto, G., & Pianini, D. (2024) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-024-03244-y · Cited by 3
“Hence, we build upon the recent work by Calegari et al. [24], which surveys the state-of-the-art of logic-based agent-oriented technologies, and we select the ones aimed to support general-purpose BDI agents programming.”
Self-citationOn Alternating-time Temporal Logic, Hyperproperties, and Strategy Sharing
Beutner, R., & Finkbeiner, B. (2023) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.12403 · Cited by 3
Inference Engines Performance in Reasoning Tasks for Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Александрович, С. О., Аникин, А. В., & Denisov, M. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86960-1_33 · Cited by 5
Attention Guidance Agents with Eye-Tracking - A Use-Case Based on the MATBII Cockpit Task
Durant, S., Wilkins, B., Woods, C., Uliana, E., & Stathis, K. (2021) · EMAS@AAMAS · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-97457-2_6 · Cited by 3
“However, many cognitive agent models and their implementation platforms (see [10] and [36]) are often resource heavy for real-time applications as demanding as eye-tracking.”
BackgroundCombining Neural Empathy-Aware Behavior Trees With Knowledge Graphs for Affective Human-AI Teaming
Amaral, G., Costantini, S., Gasperis, G. D., Lauretis, L. D., Dell'acqua, P., Guizzardi, G., Gullo, F., & Rafanelli, A. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2025.3641641 · Cited by 2
“…BDI proposal, these notions have significantly evolved in computational logics, and many logic-based agent-oriented languages and frameworks to specify agents and multi-agent systems have been defined (for a survey of these languages and architectures, the reader may refer to [46], [47], [48]).”
OptAgent: an Agentic AI framework for Intelligent Building Operations
Jiang, Z.-X., Xu, W., & Dong, B. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.20005 · Cited by 2
“Instead of following hardcoded procedures (as in traditional rule-based automation [6]), agentic AI systems can perceive context, reason about goals, generate multi-step plans, execute actions through external tools, and revise decisions using feedback-driven adaptation [7].”
Knowledge Management in Virtual Organisations Using Mobile Agents
Nicola-Gavrilă, L., & Popirlan, C. (2025) · Journal of Research, Innovation and Technologies (JoRIT) · doi:10.57017/jorit.v4.1(7).04 · Cited by 2
“Building upon the foundational characteristics, scholars such as Nami & Malekpour (2008) and Calegari et al. (2020) propose additional dimensions that define how virtual organizations operate in practice.”
Abadi, C., Manssouri, I., Abadi, M., Abadi, A., & Sahbi, H. (2023) · International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa · doi:10.4028/p-2vxi5u · Cited by 2
“It is based on three different artificial intelligent tools specifically: • The fuzzy Ontologies which are defined as a quintuple OF = {I, C, R, F, A} where I is a set of individuals, C is a set of concepts, R is a set of relations, F is a set of fuzzy relations and A is the set of axioms [1-4].”
BackgroundNeural-logic multi-agent system for flood event detection
Rafanelli, A., Costantini, S., & Gasperis, G. D. (2023) · Intelligenza Artificiale · doi:10.3233/ia-230004 · Cited by 2
“This because a logic basis provides (at least potentially) verifiability and explainability, and thus trustworthiness [7] 3 .”
Empathetic human-agent interaction via emotional behavior trees
Dell'acqua, P., & Costantini, S. (2023) · Intelligenza Artificiale · doi:10.3233/ia-230014 · Cited by 2
“Several agent-oriented programming languages and systems exist, many of them based upon computational logic (cf., e.g., [4, 5, 14] for recent surveys on such languages).”
A Theorem Proving Approach to Formal Verification of a Cognitive Agent
Jensen, A. B. (2021) · International Symposium on Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86261-9_1 · Cited by 2
Dynamic resource allocation for multiagent systems via deep reinforcement learning
He, Z. (2026) · International Conference on Big Data, Computational Intelligence and Applications · doi:10.1117/12.3105724 · Cited by 1
“MAS have been at the core of the design of intelligent systems since their very beginning, and their long-term connection with logic-based technologies, which characterised their early days, might open new ways to engineer explainable intelligent systems [2].”
Aloui, A., Hachicha, H., & Zagrouba, E. (2026) · IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems (Print) · doi:10.1109/tits.2025.3628897 · Cited by 1
Using Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Fault Prediction and Maintenance on the Factory Floor
Soechit, A., & Hosein, P. (2025) · 2025 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD) · doi:10.1109/ictmod66732.2025.11371787 · Cited by 1
“These agents are capable of sensing, reasoning and acting either independently or cooperatively [12].”
ActionFusion: Framework of Large Action Model Enablement
Shan, R., & Shan, T. C. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825136 · Cited by 1
Learning Coordinated Maneuver in Adversarial Environments
Hu, Z., Limbu, M., Shishika, D., Xiao, X., & Wang, X. (2024) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros58592.2024.10802227 · Cited by 1
“Such constraints and task specifications can be encoded through logic formulation and piece-wise nonlinear functions [14].”
On the external concurrency of current BDI frameworks for MAS
Baiardi, M., Burattini, S., Ciatto, G., Pianini, D., Ricci, A., & Omicini, A. (2024) · International Workshop on Engineering Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-71152-7_3 · Cited by 1
“On mainstream programming platforms, (such as the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) [12], used for the implementation of several BDI frameworks), computational autonomy may be achieved by mapping each agent onto a control-flow-related primitive: a thread, a processes, or an event loop.”
Self-citationHow to model contrary-to-duty with GCP-nets
Loreggia, A., Calegari, R., Lorini, E., Rossi, F., & Sartor, G. (2022) · Intelligenza Artificiale · doi:10.3233/ia-221057 · Cited by 1
Self-citationCOMMONKADS for Knowledge Based System Development: A Literature Study
Cahyaningsih, E., Silalahi, N., Rohajawati, S., & Avianti, Y. M. (2022) · International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation · doi:10.1109/icitsi56531.2022.9970920 · Cited by 1
“…paper) [9], 2012 (4 paper) [3], [4], [10], [12], 2013 (2 paper) [7], [8], 2014 (4 paper) [5], [11], [14], [19], 2015 (1 paper) [6], 2020 (1 paper) [23], 2021 (3 paper) [20], [22], [21] 2022 (2 paper) [22], [29] ) [20], agriculture (2 paper) [9], [19], tourism (1 paper) [3], education (1 paper)…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFramework proposal for adaptive mobile intelligent agents
Ledesma, E. F. R., Palma-Orozco, R., & Gonzaga, E. A. (2021) · Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics · doi:10.11591/eei.v10i5.2841 · Cited by 1
“Jade [11] x x x x Jason [14] x x x x Agentsheets [15] x x x x Cormas [16] x x x x x Ingenias [17] x x x x x Repast [19] x x x x Madkit [20] x x Netlogo [21] x x x Simpack [22] Starlogo [23] x x x x Framework de SySAge x x x x x x x x”
BackgroundMethodTogether Is Better! Integrating BDI and RL Agents for Safe Learning and Effective Collaboration
Parmiggiani, M., Ferrando, A., & Mascardi, V. (2025) · International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.5220/0013077000003890 · Cited by 1
“Symbolic agents, also known as deliberative or logical agents, operate based on explicit representations of the rules of knowledge and reasoning (de Silva et al., 2020; Calegari et al., 2021).”
Self-citationE-learning model based on intelligent agents and web services
Altaie, A. M., & Hammo, A. Y. (2025) · AIP Conference Proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0257529 · Cited by 1
Towards Explainable Visionary Agents: License to Dare and Imagine
Ciatto, G., Najjar, A., Calbimonte, J.-P., & Calvaresi, D. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-82017-6_9 · Cited by 2
Self-citationAgent Mining Framework for Analyzing Moroccan Olive Oil Datasets
Imane, B., El, J., Abdelmajid, B., & Alaoui, T. (2020) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2020.0111274 · Cited by 1
Li, J.-N., Zhao, J.-W., Zhou, Y.-T., Zhao, Z.-F., Wu, S.-X., Wang, Y.-T., Wang, D.-Z., Chu, H., & Li, F. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.28210
“Recent advances in multi-agent systems (Cardoso and Ferrando 2021; Calegari et al. 2021) provide a promising foundation for such role-specialized co-ordination.”
Point merge system using decentralized control
Gao, Y., & Richards, A. G. (2026) · Chinese Journal of Aeronautics · doi:10.1016/j.cja.2026.104489
Wu, L., Geng, L., Xue, J., Qian, Y., Liu, Z., & Wuni, I. Y. (2026) · AI in Civil Engineering · doi:10.1007/s43503-026-00107-8
Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of hereditary diseases
Кобринский, Б. А. (2026) · Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii (Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics) · doi:10.21508/1027-4065-2026-71-3-7-15
Hasan, R., & Mahmood, S. (2026) · Journal of Informatics and Web Engineering · doi:10.33093/jiwe.2026.5.2.20
Macro-Programming Multi-Agent Systems: A Framework for Artificial Collective Intelligence
Casadei, R. (2026) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.65109/saxg2906
“Another class is given by declarative approaches [7, 15], often logic-based, that specify what are the goals (rather than how they should be pursued).”
High-level reasoning while low-level actuation in cyber-physical systems: How efficient is it?
Karaduman, B., Tezel, B. T., & Challenger, M. (2026) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2026.101090
Foundations for Multi-Logic Modelling and Supervision of Cyber–Physical IoT Agents
Karaduman, B., & Challenger, M. (2026) · Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Software Engineering Research and Practices for the IoT · doi:10.1145/3786159.3788484
“As mentioned by [5, 6], logical approaches, especially fuzzy logic, play a prominent role in both rule-based control and uncertainty handling, despite the widely used basic form.”
Logical Robots: Declarative Multi-Agent Programming in Logica
Skvortsov, E., Xia, Y., Garg, O., Bowers, S., & Ludäscher, B. (2026) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.65109/ukvj1021
“While logic programming has been applied to reactive control (IndiGolog [3] and LTL synthesis [7]), surveys of logic-based MAS technologies [2] confirm most approaches operate at high abstraction levels, leaving low-level control to imperative code.”
Future of AI is Multi-Agent with Sub-Agents in Software Testing and Automation
Singh, H. (2026) · International journal of scientific and research publications · doi:10.29322/ijsrp.16.02.2026.p17046
Sharko, P. A., Burlutskaya, Z., Gintciak, A., Beketov, S. M., & Lundaeva, K. A. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su172411130
Trust in Artificial Intelligence Technologies
Kobrinskii, B. A. (2025) · Scientific and Technical Information Processing · doi:10.3103/s0147688225700455
“Recently, along with the rapid development of modern subsymbolic approaches to AI, symbolic approaches of classical AI are gaining momentum again as more and more researchers exploit their potential to make AI more understandable, explain-able and therefore trustworthy [3, 4].”
Using Modern Agent Toolkits with Logical Agents
Lloyd, N., & Lewis, P. R. (2025) · 2025 IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing and Self-Organizing Systems Companion (ACSOS-C) · doi:10.1109/acsos-c66519.2025.00059
Architecture of multi-agent systems for generative automatic matching among heterogeneous systems
Batouta, Z. I., Dehbi, R., & Talea, M. (2025) · International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · doi:10.11591/ijece.v15i2.pp2345-2355
Design of a Task-Driven Multi-Agent Alliance Optimization Mechanism in Land Warfare Context
Zhang, J., Zhu, F., Tang, X., Wang, C., Li, D., Lv, T., & Chen, Z. (2024) · Proceedings of the 4th Asia-Pacific Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Forum · doi:10.1145/3718491.3718509
“Multi-agent systems (MAS), as a key technology for collaborative warfare, enable multiple agents to achieve efficient cooperation through means such as information sharing, task allocation, and resource scheduling [1-9], thereby optimizing decision-making and execution.”
Gudipuri, N. (2024) · The Eastasouth Journal of Information System and Computer Science · doi:10.58812/esiscs.v2i01.1170
“The influence of the belief-desire-intention (BDI) and related reasoning formalisms on logic-based technologies for MAS and the needs for tools and frameworks to build production-grade agent systems have also been surveyed [10, 12].”
Dynamic Load Balancing and Distribution Algorithm in Distributed Cloud Computing
Mochalov, V., Bratchenko, N. Y., & Gosteva, D. (2024) · 2024 International Russian Smart Industry Conference (SmartIndustryCon) · doi:10.1109/smartindustrycon61328.2024.10515775
“According to [7,8], fractal network processes have a long-term dependence, expressed in an infinite correlation interval.”
BackgroundMulti-Objective Trapping of UAVs Swarm Based on Gene Regulatory Networks
Xu, P., Shi, Z., & Fan, Z. (2023) · Cyber .. · doi:10.1109/cyber59472.2023.10256516
An anti-consensus strategy based on continuous perturbation updates in opposite directions
Xie, Y., Liang, X.-T., Huang, Y.-F., Hou, J., & Jia, Y.-B. (2022) · J. High Speed Networks · doi:10.3233/jhs-220001
“As a popular and mature research field, multi-agent system (MAS) makes arrangements for a group of agents to accomplish a common problem or task in a centralized or distributed manner [3,4].”
Spatio-Temporal Graph Spectral Network for Personalized Itinerary Recommendation
Wang, T., Cheng, R., & Wang, Y. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3604019
“The emergence of hybrid systems [34], [35], [36], which blend ontological knowledge [37], collaborative filtering, and multi-agent frameworks, represents a logical progression, but frequently at the cost of greater system complexity.”
Advance Security Schemes for Smart Societies
Joshi, M., Mazumdar, B., & Dey, S. (2021) · Green Technological Innovation for Sustainable Smart Societies · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-73295-0_14
Metadata
- Authors
- Calegari, R., Ciatto, G., Mascardi, V., & Omicini, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Bologna (IT)
- University of Genoa (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Calegari, Roberta
- Ciatto, Giovanni
- Mascardi, Viviana
- Omicini, Andrea
- Venue
- Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
- Published
- 2020-10-19
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1387-2532 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7454
- OpenAlex
- W3093365097
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 392
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 0.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Keywords
- multi-agent systems, symbolic AI, knowledge representation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review