Cited by 48Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationInnovations in Medical Education

A natural language intelligent tutoring system for training pathologists: implementation and evaluation

Open access
El Saadawi, Gilan M., Tseytlin, Eugene, Legowski, Elizabeth, Jukic, Drazen, Castine, Melissa, Fine, Jeffrey, Gormley, Robert, Crowley, Rebecca S.·2008·Advances in Health Sciences Education

Abstract

Introduction We developed and evaluated a Natural Language Interface (NLI) for an Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS) in Diagnostic Pathology. The system teaches residents to examine pathologic slides and write accurate pathology reports while providing immediate feedback on errors they make in their slide review and diagnostic reports. Residents can ask for help at any point in the case, and will receive context-specific feedback.Research questions We evaluated (1) the performance of our natural language system, (2) the effect of the system on learning (3) the effect of feedback timing on learning gains and (4) the effect of ReportTutor on performance to self-assessment correlations.Methods The study uses a crossover 2 x 2 factorial design. We recruited 20 subjects from 4 academic programs. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of the four conditions--two conditions for the immediate interface, and two for the delayed interface. An expert dermatopathologist created a reference standard and 2 board certified AP/CP pathology fellows manually coded the residents' assessment reports. Subjects were given the opportunity to self grade their performance and we used a survey to determine student response to both interfaces.Results Our results show a highly significant improvement in report writing after one tutoring session with 4-fold increase in the learning gains with both interfaces but no effect of feedback timing on performance gains. Residents who used the immediate feedback interface first experienced a feature learning gain that is correlated with the number of cases they viewed. There was no correlation between performance and self-assessment in either condition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10459-007-9081-3

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The common themes of intelligent tutoring system use in medical education include teaching course content, diagnosing strengths or gaps in students' knowledge, providing automated feedback, curating learning materials based on student's needs, and facilitating collaboration between learners.

    “The common themes of ITS use in medical education include teaching course content, diagnosing strengths or gaps in students' knowledge, providing automated feedback, curating learning materials based on student's needs, and facilitating collaboration between learners [12].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
El Saadawi, G. M., Tseytlin, E., Legowski, E., Jukic, D., Castine, M., Fine, J., Gormley, R., & Crowley, R. S.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Crowley, Rebecca S.
Venue
Advances in Health Sciences Education
Published
2007-10-13
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
709-722
ISSN
  • 1382-4996 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1677
OpenAlex
W2020458978
Cited by
48
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Health Sciences Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01lm007891-06)
  • National Cancer Institute (R25CA101959)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01-LM007891, LM007885, P41LM007885)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
intelligent tutoring systems, natural language interfaces, pathology residents, immediate feedback, feedback timing, self-assessment, dermatopathology, medical education
MeSH terms
Computer-Assisted Instruction, Humans, Internship and Residency, Natural Language Processing, Pathology, Self-Assessment, User-Computer Interface, Writing, Program Evaluation, Models, Educational, Problem-Based Learning, Feedback, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review