Cited by 47Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsHealth Sciences Research and Education

Mental workload as a key factor in clinical decision making

Byrne, Aidan·2013·Advances in Health Sciences Education

Abstract

The decision making process is central to the practice of a clinician and has traditionally been described in terms of the hypothetico-deductive model. More recently, models adapted from cognitive psychology, such as the dual process and script theories have proved useful in explaining patterns of practice not consistent with purely cognitive based practice. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the concept of mental workload as a key determinant of the type of cognitive processing used by clinicians. Published research appears to be consistent with 'schemata' based cognition as the principle mode of working for those engaged in complex tasks under time pressure. Although conscious processing of factual data is also used, it may be the primary mode of cognition only in situations where time pressure is not a factor. Further research on the decision making process should be based on outcomes which are not dependant on conscious recall of past actions or events and include a measure of mental workload. This further appears to support the concept of the patient, within the clinical environment, as the most effective learning resource.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10459-012-9360-5

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experienced clinicians relied on metacognitive skills to identify relevant details and adapt basic science knowledge into appropriate clinical decisions, whereas novices relied more heavily on predetermined treatment routines.

    “For example, when presented with complex clinical scenarios, experienced clinicians consistently relied on their metacognitive skills to identify relevant details and adapt their basic science knowledge into an appropriate clinical decision, whereas novices relied more heavily on predetermined treatment routines (Byrne, 2013).”

    From Promoting metacognition in an allied health anatomy course (2023) · cites this paper as Byrne, 2013

  • Increased educational stress and cognitive workload can negatively impact metacognition.

    “Given that increased educational stress and cognitive workload can negatively impact metacognition (Byrne, 2013; Saricam et al.,2017)”

    From Promoting metacognition in an allied health anatomy course (2023) · cites this paper as Byrne, 2013

  • Mental workload is a multidimensional concept reflecting work behaviour, effort and performance in complex and dynamic situations.

    “mental workload is a multidimensional concept reflecting work behaviour, effort and performance in complex and dynamic situations [17]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Byrne, A.
Affiliations
Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Byrne, Aidan
Venue
Advances in Health Sciences Education
Published
2012-03-13
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
537-545
ISSN
  • 1382-4996 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1677
OpenAlex
W2074050068
Cited by
47
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in Health Sciences Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
mental workload, clinical decision-making, dual-process theory, script theory, schema theory, cognitive processes, time pressure, conscious processing, hypothetico-deductive method
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Cognition, Decision Making, Education, Medical, Humans, Physicians

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review