The Stanford Medical youth science program: Educational and science-related outcomes
Abstract
Biomedical preparatory programs (pipeline programs) have been developed at colleges and universities to better prepare youth for entering science- and health-related careers, but outcomes of such programs have seldom been rigorously evaluated. We conducted a matched cohort study to evaluate the Stanford Medical Youth Science Program's Summer Residential Program (SRP), a 25-year-old university-based biomedical pipeline program that reaches out to low-income and underrepresented ethnic minority high school students. Five annual surveys were used to assess educational outcomes and science-related experience among 96 SRP participants and a comparison group of 192 youth who applied but were not selected to participate in the SRP, using ~2:1 matching on sociodemographic and academic background to control for potential confounders. SRP participants were more likely than the comparison group to enter college (100.0 vs. 84.4 %, p = 0.002), and both of these matriculation rates were more than double the statewide average (40.8 %). In most areas of science-related experience, SRP participants reported significantly more experience (>twofold odds) than the comparison group at 1 year of follow-up, but these differences did not persist after 2-4 years. The comparison group reported substantially more participation in science or college preparatory programs, more academic role models, and less personal adversity than SRP participants, which likely influenced these findings toward the null h…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mentorship and support structures are frequently mentioned as important components of effective pathway programs.
“Mentorship and support structures, in particular, are frequently mentioned as important components of effective pathway programs (Crump et al., 2015;Patterson et al., 2023;Stephenson-Hunter et al., 2019).”
From Pathway to Medicine and Health Programs Revisited: Outcomes and Institutional Adaptations in Greater Philadelphia and Beyond (2026) · cites this paper as Crump et al., 2015
Other programs such as the Stanford Medical Youth Science Program's Summer Residential Program (SRP) and the Careers in Health and Medical Professions Program (CHAMPS) positively impacted student career aspirations, self-efficacy in tackling science course material and enhanced problem-solving.
“Other programs such as the Stanford Medical Youth Science Program's Summer Residential Program (SRP) and the Careers in Health and Medical Professions Program (CHAMPS) (Crump et al., 2015;Wallace et al., 2015) positively impacted student career aspirations, self-efficacy in tackling science course material and enhanced problem-solving.”
From Pathway to Medicine and Health Programs Revisited: Outcomes and Institutional Adaptations in Greater Philadelphia and Beyond (2026) · cites this paper as Crump et al., 2015
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bright, D., Hughes, S., & Muir, R. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16010170 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Crump, C., Ned, J., & Winkleby, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Crump, Casey
- ORCID
- Crump, Casey
- Venue
- Advances in Health Sciences Education
- Published
- 2014-08-06
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 457-466
- ISSN
- 1382-4996 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1677
- OpenAlex
- W1973305792
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Advances in Health Sciences Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (R25OD011139)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
- Keywords
- underrepresented minority students, low-income students, college enrollment, educational outcomes, program evaluation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, California, Education, Premedical, Educational Measurement, Female, Humans, Male, Minority Groups, Science, Socioeconomic Factors, Universities, Cohort Studies, Program Evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review