Cited by 24Medical Education and AdmissionsInnovations in Medical EducationDiversity and Career in Medicine

A summer prematriculation program to help students succeed in medical school

Schneid, Stephen D., Apperson, April, Laiken, Nora, Mandel, Jess, Kelly, Carolyn J., Brandl, Katharina·2018·Advances in Health Sciences Education

Abstract

Medical schools with a diverse student body face the challenge of ensuring that all students succeed academically. Many medical schools have implemented prematriculation programs to prepare students from diverse backgrounds; however, evidence on their impact is largely lacking. In this study, we analyzed participants' demographics as well as the impact of the prematriculation program on Year 1 performance. Predictive validity of the program was assessed and compared to other traditional predictors, including grade point average (GPA) and Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) scores and subscores. Linear mixed effect models determined the impact of the prematriculation program, and linear regression analysis assessed the predictive value of the overall score in the prematriculation program and other traditional predictors. Demographics of students participating in the prematriculation program from 2013 to 2015 (n = 75) revealed a significantly higher prevalence of academically disadvantaged students including older students, students with lower GPA and MCAT scores and students of racial and ethnic populations that are underrepresented in medicine, compared to non-participants (n = 293). Participants performed significantly better in Year 1 courses that were covered in the prematriculation program compared to courses that were not covered. The overall performance in the prematriculation program correlated significantly with Year 1 performance and was found to be a strong predic…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10459-017-9808-8

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schneid, S. D., Apperson, A., Laiken, N., Mandel, J., Kelly, C. J., & Brandl, K.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Brandl, Katharina
Venue
Advances in Health Sciences Education
Published
2018-01-16
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
499-511
ISSN
  • 1382-4996 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1677
OpenAlex
W2783488958
Cited by
24
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in Health Sciences Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
summer programs, medical school admissions, academic performance, underrepresented minority students, predictive validity, first-year medical students, MCAT scores, grade point average, program effectiveness
MeSH terms
Academic Success, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Schools, Medical, Socioeconomic Factors, Program Evaluation, Linear Models, Cultural Diversity, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review