Cited by 38Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

Divinity and Distress: The Impact of Religion and Spirituality on the Mental Health of HIV-Positive Adults in Tanzania

Steglitz, Jeremy, Ng, Reuben, Mosha, John S., Kershaw, Trace·2012·AIDS and Behavior

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between religiosity, spirituality and mental health in the context of a stress-coping framework. Participants were 135 rural, low-income HIV-positive adults in Iringa, Tanzania. The relationships between religiosity, spirituality, coping responses, social support, and psychological distress (depression, anxiety, and stress) were examined using structural equation modeling. Religiosity was related to decreased avoidant coping and increased social support, which in turn were related to psychological distress. Spirituality was positively related to active coping and social support. Results suggest that coping strategies and social support may mediate the relationship between religiosity and spirituality and psychological distress. Interventions to reduce psychological distress among HIV-positive individuals in Tanzania might incorporate strategies to reduce avoidant coping and increase social support. According to the present findings, this may be accomplished through faith-based approaches that incorporate religious and spiritual activities into HIV prevention programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10461-012-0261-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More social support was moderately associated with lower levels of stress (β = -0.34, p < 0.01).

    “Avoidant coping was moderate to strongly related to more depression ( β = 0.68, p &lt; 0.01), anxiety ( β = 0.57, p &lt; 0.01) and stress ( β = 0.54, p &lt; 0.001) while more social support was weakly associated with lower levels of depression ( β = -0.27, p &lt; 0.01) and moderately associated with lower levels of both anxiety ( β = -0.30, p &lt; 0.001) and stress ( β = -0.34 , p &lt; 0.01)”
  • More social support was moderately associated with lower levels of anxiety (β = -0.30, p < 0.001).

    “Avoidant coping was moderate to strongly related to more depression ( β = 0.68, p &lt; 0.01), anxiety ( β = 0.57, p &lt; 0.01) and stress ( β = 0.54, p &lt; 0.001) while more social support was weakly associated with lower levels of depression ( β = -0.27, p &lt; 0.01) and moderately associated with lower levels of both anxiety ( β = -0.30, p &lt; 0.001) and stress ( β = -0.34 , p &lt; 0.01)”
  • In a Tanzania study, religiosity had a significant indirect relationship with mental health disorders through avoidant coping (Steglitz et al., 2012).

    “A Tanzania study found a sig­ nificant indirect relationship between religiosity and spirituality with mental health disorders through avoi­ dant coping and social support, respectively (Steglitz et al., 2012).”
  • Avoidant coping was moderate to strongly related to more depression (β = 0.68, p < 0.01).

    “Avoidant coping was moderate to strongly related to more depression ( β = 0.68, p &lt; 0.01), anxiety ( β = 0.57, p &lt; 0.01) and stress ( β = 0.54, p &lt; 0.001) while more social support was weakly associated with lower levels of depression ( β = -0.27, p &lt; 0.01) and moderately associated with lower levels of both anxiety ( β = -0.30, p &lt; 0.001) and stress ( β = -0.34 , p &lt; 0.01)”
  • More religiosity was weakly associated with more social support (β = 0.27, p < 0.05) (Steglitz et al., 2012).

    “More religiosity was moderately associated with less avoidant coping ( β = -0.35, p &lt; 0.05) and weakly associated with more social support ( β = 0.27 , p &lt; 0.05) while being more spiritual was moderately related with more active coping ( β = 0.49, p &lt; 0.001) and more social support ( β = 0.48, p &lt; 0.001) (Steglitz et al., 2012).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 38

Authors
Steglitz, J., Ng, R., Mosha, J. S., & Kershaw, T.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Primary Health Care Institute (TZ)
Corresponding author
Kershaw, Trace
Venue
AIDS and Behavior
Published
2012-07-15
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
2392-2398
ISSN
  • 1090-7165 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3254
OpenAlex
W2047104600
Cited by
38
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • AIDS and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
religiosity, spirituality, HIV-infected adults, mental health, psychological distress, stress coping, social support, depression, anxiety, avoidance coping, active coping, faith-based interventions, Tanzania
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, HIV Seropositivity, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rural Population, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress, Psychological, Tanzania, Spirituality, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review