Cited by 135HIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

Measurement model exploring a syndemic in emerging adult gay and bisexual men

Open access
Halkitis, Perry N., Moeller, Robert W., Siconolfi, Daniel E., Storholm, Erik D., Solomon, Todd M., Bub, Kristen L.·2013·AIDS and Behavior

Abstract

The current study was designed to develop a better understanding of the nature of the relationships between mental health burden, drug use, and unprotected sexual behavior within a sample of emerging adult gay and bisexual men, ages 18-19 (N = 598) and to test a theory of syndemics using structural equation modeling. Participants were actively recruited from community-based settings and the Internet for participation in a seven-wave cohort study. Data for participant characteristics and mental health were collected via computer-assisted survey, while drug use and unprotected sex behaviors for the month prior to assessment were collected via a calendar-based technique. Using the baseline data, we developed and tested structural equation models for mental health burden, drug use, and unprotected sex and also tested a second-order model for a single syndemic. First-order measurement models for each of the three epidemics were successfully identified using observed data. Tests of a second-order model seeking to explain the three epidemics as a single syndemic fit poorly. However, a second-order construct comprised of mental health burden and drug use fit the data well and was highly associated with the first-order construct of unprotected sex. The findings advance a theory of syndemics and suggest that in order to be maximally effective both HIV prevention and HIV care must be delivered holistically such that sexual risk behaviors are addressed in relation to, and in sync with, the drug use and mental health of the individual.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10461-012-0273-3

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The count variable approach has drawn limited criticism in the syndemics literature as overly simplistic.

    “The count variable approach has received muted criticism in the syndemics literature for being too “simplistic” (Gebrekristos, 2010; Halkitis et al., 2013).”

    From Syndemics of psychosocial problems and HIV risk: A systematic review of empirical tests of the disease interaction concept (2015) · cites this paper as Halkitis et al., 2013

    In the Introduction (“The Present Study”; page unavailable), Halkitis et al. criticize additive syndemic measures for weighing variables equally and relying on simple correlations. The Discussion likewise contrasts prior summation-based studies with its more complex model. These passages support the criticism that the approach is simplistic, but do not establish that criticism across the literature was limited or “muted.” (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most research on syndemics has focused on gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men.

    “To date, the majority of research on syndemics has focused on GBMSM [37–42].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [3]New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene New HIV diagnoses rising in New York City among men who have sex with men Press Release No. 079-07 New York City New York City Department of Health 2007
  2. [17]Kinsey AC Pomeroy WB Martin CE Sexual behaviors in the human male Bloomington Indiana University Press 1998

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halkitis, P. N., Moeller, R. W., Siconolfi, D. E., Storholm, E. D., Solomon, T. M., & Bub, K. L.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Auburn University (US)
Corresponding author
Halkitis, Perry N.
Venue
AIDS and Behavior
Published
2012-07-28
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
662-673
ISSN
  • 1090-7165 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3254
OpenAlex
W2024499267
Cited by
135
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AIDS and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01da025537-11)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (#R01DA025537)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Keywords
syndemic, emerging adults, gay men, bisexual men, mental health burden, drug use, unprotected sex, HIV prevention, HIV care, measurement model, second-order construct, sexual risk behavior
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Bisexuality, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Mental Health, Risk-Taking, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, Social Support, United States, Models, Statistical, Cohort Studies, HIV Infections, Condoms, Homosexuality, Male, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review