Cited by 26HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

Transgender Women’s Experiences Using a Home HIV-Testing Kit for Partner-Testing

Open access
Rael, Christine Tagliaferri, Giguere, Rebecca, Lopez-Rios, Javier, Lentz, Cody, Balán, Iván C., Sheinfil, Alan, Dolezal, Curtis, Brown, William +7 more·2020·AIDS and Behavior

Abstract

HIV partner-testing (PT) may represent a unique and empowering HIV prevention strategy for groups that face structural and institutional barriers to HIV testing and care, including transgender women. We report on in-depth interviews (IDIs) with N = 10 transgender women who used HIV self-test kits for three months to screen potential sexual partners in a randomized controlled trial (iSUM; "I'll Show You Mine") that took place in New York City and San Juan, Puerto Rico. Participants were assigned to intervention (supplied with 10 self-test kits immediately) or control groups (received 6 test kits after 3 months). We conducted IDIs with the first N = 10 transgender women to enroll in the intervention group after three months in the study (after participants used kits with partners) to understand their experiences. Themes discussed in IDIs included: partners' reaction to HIV testing, participants' reactions to partners' test results or refusal to test, partners' own reaction to their test results, and decision-making around test use. Data were independently analyzed by two coders. Overwhelmingly, participants' experiences with PT was positive. Participants reported kits were convenient and acceptable to most partners. Transgender women felt that PT could pose additional risk for them; one woman experienced violence related to kit use. Furthermore, the availability of kits appeared to encourage participants and their partners to think about their HIV status and, in some cases, modify sexual behavior. Work suggests that HIV PT could be a viable risk-reduction strategy for transgender women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10461-020-02829-x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Observational studies suggested that harm related to self-testing was rare overall, but indicated some users felt pressure to test themselves and/or experienced arguments with a partner following syphilis self-testing or dual HIV/syphilis self-testing.

    “Observational studies also suggested that harm related to self-testing was rare overall, but they did indicate that some users felt pressure to test themselves and/or experienced arguments with a partner following syphilis self-testing or dual HIV/syphilis self-testing (62, 69, 75).”

    From Updated recommendations for the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Treponema pallidum (syphilis) and new recommendations on syphilis testing and partner services (2024) · cites this paper as [75]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]WHO. Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, diagnosism treatment and care for key populations. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2014. 25996019

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rael, C. T., Giguere, R., Lopez-Rios, J., Lentz, C., Balán, I. C., Sheinfil, A., Dolezal, C., Brown, W., Frasca, T., Torres, C. C., Crespo, R., Iribarren, S., Leu, C.-S., Febo, I., & Carballo-Diéguez, A.
Affiliations
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • San Francisco General Hospital (US)
  • University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus (PR)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Rael, Christine Tagliaferri
Venue
AIDS and Behavior
Published
2020-03-19
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
2732-2741
ISSN
  • 1090-7165 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3254
OpenAlex
W3011354963
Cited by
25
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AIDS and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 AI113127)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01 MH115785, P30 MH43520)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K12 HS026383)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Keywords
transgender women, HIV self-testing, HIV prevention, sexual risk reduction, violence risk, sexual behavior change
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Mass Screening, New York City, Puerto Rico, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic, Self Care, Serologic Tests, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, AIDS Serodiagnosis, HIV Infections, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Qualitative Research, Young Adult, Transgender Persons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review