Cited by 56HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskBlood donation and transfusion practices

Undetectable = Untransmittable (U = U) Messaging Increases Uptake of HIV Testing Among Men: Results from a Pilot Cluster Randomized Trial

Open access
Smith, Philip, Buttenheim, Alison, Schmucker, Laura, Bekker, Linda-Gail, Thirumurthy, Harsha, Davey, Dvora L. Joseph·2021·AIDS and Behavior

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

HIV testing coverage in sub-Saharan Africa is lower among men than women. We investigated the impact of a peer-delivered U = U (undetectable equals untransmittable) message on men’s HIV testing uptake through a cluster randomised trial with individual mobile clinic days as unit of randomisation. On standard of care (SOC) days, peer promoters informed men about the availability of HIV testing at the mobile clinic. On intervention days, peer promoters delivered U = U messages. We used logistic regression adjusting for mobile clinic location, clustering by study day, to determine the percentage of invited men who tested for HIV at the mobile clinic. Peer promoters delivered 1048 invitations over 12 days. In the SOC group, 68 (13%) of 544 men invited tested for HIV (3, 4.4% HIV-positive). In the U = U group, 112 (22%) of 504 men invited tested for HIV (7, 6.3% HIV-positive). Men in the U = U group had greater odds of testing for HIV (adjusted odds ratio = 1.89, 95% CI 1.21–2.95; p = 0.01). Tailored, peer-delivered messages that explain the benefits of HIV treatment in reducing HIV transmission can increase men’s HIV testing uptake.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10461-021-03284-y

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Smith, P., Buttenheim, A., Schmucker, L., Bekker, L.-G., Thirumurthy, H., & Davey, D. L. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Philip
Venue
AIDS and Behavior
Published
2021-05-31
Volume
25
Issue
10
Pages
3128-3136
ISSN
  • 1090-7165 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3254
OpenAlex
W3108529568
Cited by
56
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AIDS and Behavior (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-008318)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Blood donation and transfusion practices
Keywords
HIV testing uptake, men's health, undetectable equals untransmittable, mobile clinics, HIV prevention messaging, HIV treatment, HIV transmission, sub-Saharan Africa
MeSH terms
HIV Testing, Female, Humans, Male, HIV Infections, Africa South of the Sahara

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review