Cited by 110Traffic and Road SafetyIoT and GPS-based Vehicle Safety SystemsHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

Artificial intelligence techniques for driving safety and vehicle crash prediction

Halim, Zahid, Kalsoom, Rizwana, Bashir, Shariq, Abbas, Ghulam·2016·Artificial Intelligence Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10462-016-9467-9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halim, Z., Kalsoom, R., Bashir, S., & Abbas, G.
Affiliations
  • Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences and Technology (PK)
  • Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA)
Corresponding author
Halim, Zahid
Venue
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2016-02-23
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
351-387
ISSN
  • 0269-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7462
OpenAlex
W2336384609
Cited by
110
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4
FWCI
15.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Artificial Intelligence Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › IoT and GPS-based Vehicle Safety Systems
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
accident prediction, road safety, driving data, driving simulator

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review