Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 371

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 194 of the 194 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A survey on classification techniques for opinion mining and sentiment analysis

Hemmatian, Fatemeh, Sohrabi, Mohammad Karim·2019·Artificial Intelligence Review

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10462-017-9599-6

Cites

194 of 194 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 194 references

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Ahmed S, Danti A (2016) Effective sentimental analysis and opinion mining of web reviews using rule based classifiers. In: Behera H, Mohapatra D (eds) Computational intelligence in data mining—volume 1. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 410. Springer, New Delhi
  2. Arab M, Sohrabi MK (2017) Proposing a new clustering method to detect phishing websites. Turk J Electr Eng Comput Sci. https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1612-279 · doi:10.3906/elk-1612-279
  3. Bastı E, Kuzey C, Delen D (2015) Analyzing initial public offerings’ short-term performance using decision trees and SVMs. Decis Support Syst 73:15–27 · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2015.02.011
  4. Carter D, Inkpen D (2015) Inferring aspect-specific opinion structure in product reviews using co-training. In: Gelbukh A · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18117-2_17
  5. (ed) Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing. CICLing 2015. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 9042. Springer, Cham, pp 225-240
  6. Claypo N, Jaiyen S (2015) Opinion mining for thai restaurant reviews using K-means clustering and MRF feature selection. In: 7th international conference on knowledge and smart technology (KST), pp 105–108 · doi:10.1109/kst.2015.7051469
  7. De A, Kopparapu SK (2013) Unsupervised clustering technique to harness ideas from an Ideas Portal. In: International IEEE conference on advances in computing, communications and informatics (ICACCI), pp 1563–1568 · doi:10.1109/icacci.2013.6637413
  8. Feng S, Song K, Wang D, Yu G (2015) A word-emoticon mutual reinforcement ranking model for building sentiment lexicon from massive collection of microblogs. World Wide Web 18(4):949–967 · doi:10.1007/s11280-014-0289-x
  9. Ficamos P, Liu Y, Chen W (2017) A Naive Bayes and maximum entropy approach to sentiment analysis: capturing domain-specific data in Weibo. In: IEEE international conference on big data and smart computing (BigComp), pp 336–339 · doi:10.1109/bigcomp.2017.7881689
  10. Gao W, Li S, Xue Y, Wang M, Zhou G (2014) Semi-supervised sentiment classification with self-training on feature subspaces. In: Su X, He T (eds) Chinese Lexical Semantics. CLSW 2014. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 8922. Springer, Cham, pp 231–239 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14331-6_23
  11. Goel A, Gautam J, Kumar S (2016) Real time sentiment analysis of tweets using Naive Bayes. In: 2nd international conference on next generation computing technologies (NGCT), pp 257–261 · doi:10.1109/ngct.2016.7877424
  12. Grefenstette G, Qu Y, Shanahan JG, Evans DA (2004) Coupling niche browsers and affect analysis for an opinion mining application. In: Proceedings of RIAO ’04 Coupling approaches, coupling media and coupling languages for information retrieval, pp 186–194
  13. Gupta E, Rathee G, Kumar P, Chauhan DS (2015) Mood swing analyser: a dynamic sentiment detection approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect A Phys Sci 85(1):149–157 · doi:10.1007/s40010-014-0169-x
  14. Hasan KMA, Sabuj MS, Afrin Z (2015) Opinion mining using Naïve Bayes. In: IEEE International WIE conference on electrical and computer engineering (WIECON-ECE) · doi:10.1109/wiecon-ece.2015.7443981
  15. He Y, Zhou D (2011) Self-training from labeled features for sentiment analysis. Inf Process Manag 47(4):606–616 · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2010.11.003
  16. Jain A, Jain M (2017) Location based Twitter opinion mining using common-sense information. Glob J Enterp Inf Syst 9(2):28–32
  17. Jeyapriya A, Selvi K (2015) Extracting aspects and mining opinions in product reviews using supervised learning algorithm. In: 2015 2nd international conference on electronics and communication systems (ICECS). IEEE, pp 548–552 · doi:10.1109/ecs.2015.7124967
  18. Jiménez-Zafra SM, Martín-Valdivia MT, Martínez-Cámara E, Ureña-López LA (2015) Combining resources to improve unsupervised sentiment analysis at aspect-level. J Inf Sci 42:213–229 · doi:10.1177/0165551515593686
  19. Keshtkar F, Inkpen D (2013) A bootstrapping method for extracting paraphrases of emotion expressions from texts. Comput Intell 29(3):417–435 · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8640.2012.00458.x
  20. Kisioglu P, Topcu YI (2011) Applying Bayesian belief network approach to customer churn analysis: a case study on the telecom industry of Turkey. Expert Syst Appl 38(6):7151–7157 · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.045
  21. Kobayashi N, Inui K, Matsumoto Y (2007) Extracting aspect-evaluation and aspect-of relations in opinion mining. In: EMNLP-CoNLL, vol 7, pp 1065–1074
  22. Liu J, Seneff S, Zue V (2012) Harvesting and summarizing user-generated content for advanced speech-based HCI. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process 6(8):982–992 · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2012.2229690
  23. Liu S, Li F, Li F, Cheng X, Shen H (2013a) Adaptive co-training SVM for sentiment classification on tweets. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on conference on information & knowledge management. ACM, pp 2079–2088 · doi:10.1145/2505515.2505569
  24. Liu S, Zhu W, Xu N, Li F, Cheng XQ, Liu Y, Wang Y (2013b) Co-training and visualizing sentiment evolvement for tweet events. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web companion. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, pp 105–106 · doi:10.1145/2487788.2487836
  25. Lu TJ (2015) Semi-supervised microblog sentiment analysis using social relation and text similarity. In: 2015 international conference on big data and smart computing (BigComp). IEEE, pp 194–201
  26. Luo W, Zhuang F, Zhao W, He Q, Shi Z (2015) QPLSA: utilizing quad-tuples for aspect identification and rating. Inf Process Manag 51(1):25–41 · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2014.08.004
  27. Ma H, Jia M, Zhang D, Lin X (2017) Combining tag correlation and user social relation for microblog recommendation. Inf Sci 385–386:325–337 · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2016.12.047
  28. Manek AS, Shenoy PD, Mohan MC, Venougopal KR (2017) Aspect term extraction for sentiment analysis in large movie reviews using Gini Index feature selection method and SVM classifier. World Wide Web 20(2):135–154 · doi:10.1007/s11280-015-0381-x
  29. Mele I (2013) Web usage mining for enhancing search-result delivery and helping users to find interesting web content. In: Proceedings of the sixth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. ACM, pp 765–770 · doi:10.1145/2433396.2433493
  30. Parveen H, Pandey S (2016) Sentiment analysis on Twitter data-set using Naive Bayes algorithm. In: 2nd international conference on applied and theoretical computing and communication technology (iCATccT), pp 416–419 · doi:10.1109/icatcct.2016.7912034
  31. Phu VN, Dat ND, Tran VTN, Chau VTN, Nguyen TA (2017) Fuzzy C-means for english sentiment classification in a distributed system. Appl Intell 46(3):717–738 · doi:10.1007/s10489-016-0858-z
  32. Rathan M, Hulipalled VR, Venugopal KR, Patnaik LM (2017) Consumer insight mining: aspect based Twitter opinion mining of mobile phone reviews. Appl Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.07.056 · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2017.07.056
  33. Ren F, Kang X (2013) Employing hierarchical Bayesian networks in simple and complex emotion topic analysis. Comput Speech Lang 27(4):943–968 · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2012.07.012
  34. Shi B, Chang K (2008) Generating a concept hierarchy for sentiment analysis. In: IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, SMC 2008. IEEE, pp 312–317
  35. Sisodia DS, Verma S (2012) Web usage pattern analysis through web logs: a review. In: 2012 international joint conference on computer science and software engineering (JCSSE). IEEE, pp 49–53
  36. Sohrabi MK (2018) A gossip-based information fusion protocol for distributed frequent itemset mining. Enterp Inf Syst. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2017.1405286 · doi:10.1080/17517575.2017.1405286
  37. Sohrabi MK, Azgomi H (2017b) TSGV: a table-like structure based greedy method for materialized view selection in data warehouse. Turk J Electr Eng Comput Sci 25(4):3175–3187 · doi:10.3906/elk-1608-112
  38. Sohrabi MK, Ghods V (2014) Top-down vertical itemset mining. In: Proceedings of the SPIE 9443 sixth international conference on graphic and image processing · doi:10.1117/12.2179150
  39. Sohrabi MK, Ghods V (2015) Top- materialized view selection for a data warehouse using frequent itemset mining. In: Proceedings of the ICACTE conference, Berlin, Germany
  40. Sohrabi MK, Ghods V (2016) CUSE: a novel cube-based approach for sequential pattern mining. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium on computational business intelligence, Olten, Switzerland · doi:10.1109/iscbi.2016.7743281
  41. Sohrabi MK, Marzooni HH (2016) Association rule mining using new FP-linked list algorithm. J Adv Comput Res 7(01):23–34
  42. Tsagkalidou K, Koutsonikola V, Vakali A, Kafetsios K (2011) Emotional aware clustering on micro-blogging sources. In: D’Mello S, Graesser A, Schuller B, Martin JC (eds) Affective computing and intelligent interaction. ACII 2011. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6974. Springer, Berlin, pp 387–396 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24600-5_42
  43. Vakali A, Kafetsios K (2012) Emotion aware clustering analysis as a tool for Web 2.0 communities detection: implications for curriculum development. In: World Wide Web Conference. WWW
  44. Wang J, Xue Y, Li S, Zhou G (2015c) Leveraging interactive knowledge and unlabeled data in gender classification with co-training. In: Liu A, Ishikawa Y, Qian T, Nutanong S, Cheema M (eds) Database Systems for Advanced Applications. DASFAA 2015. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 9052. Springer, Cham, pp 246–251 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22324-7_23
  45. Xia Y, Cambria E, Hussain A (2015) AspNet: aspect extraction by bootstrapping generalization and propagation using an aspect network. Cogn Comput 7(2):241–253 · doi:10.1007/s12559-014-9305-9
  46. Xu L, Lin J, Wang L, Yin C, Wang J (2017) Deep convolutional neural network based approach for aspect-based sentiment analysis. Adv Sci Technol Lett 143:199–204 · doi:10.14257/astl.2017.143.41
  47. Yin PY, Guo YM (2013) Optimization of multi-criteria website structure based on enhanced tabu search and web usage mining. Appl Math Comput 219(24):11082–11095
  48. Zhang X, Gong W, Kawamura Y (2004) Customer behavior pattern discovering with web mining. In: Yu JX, Lin X, Lu H, Zhang Y (eds) Advanced web technologies and applications. APWeb, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3007. Springer, Berlin, pp 844–853 · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24655-8_92
  49. Zimmermann M, Ntoutsi E, Spiliopoulou M (2016) Extracting opinionated (sub) features from a stream of product reviews using accumulated novelty and internal re-organization. Inf Sci 329:876–899 · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2015.06.050
  50. Zimmermann M, Ntoutsi E, Spiliopoulou M (2014) A semi-supervised self-adaptive classifier over opinionated streams. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on data mining workshop (ICDMW). IEEE, pp 425–432 · doi:10.1109/icdmw.2014.106

Cited by

See all 371

Metadata

Authors
Hemmatian, F., & Sohrabi, M. K.
Venue
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2017-12-18
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
1495-1545
ISSN
  • 0269-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7462
OpenAlex
W2779594574
Cited by
371
References
194
FWCI
12.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A survey on classification techniques for opinion mining and sentiment analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10462-017-9599-6
The paper
Hemmatian, F., & Sohrabi, M. K. (2019). A survey on classification techniques for opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Artificial Intelligence Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-017-9599-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.