The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review of deep learning techniques for plant diseases
Open accessAbstract
Agriculture is one of the most crucial sectors, meeting the fundamental food needs of humanity. Plant diseases increase food economic and food security concerns for countries and disrupt their agricultural planning. Traditional methods for detecting plant diseases require a lot of labor and time. Consequently, many researchers and institutions strive to address these issues using advanced technological methods. Deep learning-based plant disease detection offers considerable progress and hope compared to classical methods. When trained with large and high-quality datasets, these technologies robustly detect diseases on plant leaves in early stages. This study systematically reviews the application of deep learning techniques in plant disease detection by analyzing 160 research articles from 2020 to 2024. The studies are examined in three different areas: classification, detection, and segmentation of diseases on plant leaves, while also thoroughly reviewing publicly available datasets. This systematic review offers a comprehensive assessment of the current literature, detailing the most popular deep learning architectures, the most frequently studied plant diseases, datasets, encountered challenges, and various perspectives. It provides new insights for researchers working in the agricultural sector. Moreover, it addresses the major challenges in the field of disease detection in agriculture. Thus, this study offers valuable information and a suitable solution based on deep learning applications for agricultural sustainability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows
Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., & Guo, B. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00986 · Cited by 35,534
Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutions
Chollet, F. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.195 · Cited by 20,380
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T., mulrow, C., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J., Akl, E., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/v7gm2 · Cited by 5,177
Multiscale vision transformers
Fan, H., Xiong, B., Mangalam, K., Li, Y., Yan, Z., Malik, J., & Feichtenhofer, C. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00675 · Cited by 1,407
Pham, T. N., Tran, L. V., & Dao, S. V. T. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3031914 · Cited by 262 · cited 1×
“Pham et al. (2020) used an ANN model to classify mango leaves in the PlantVillage dataset, achieving an 89.41% accuracy rate.”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Pacal, I., Kunduracioglu, I., Alma, M. H., Deveci, M., Kadry, S., Nedoma, J., Slany, V., & Martinek, R.
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence Review
- Published
- 2024-09-30
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 0269-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7462
- OpenAlex
- W4402994936
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 14.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review of deep learning techniques for plant diseases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10462-024-10944-7
- The paper
- Pacal, I., Kunduracioglu, I., Alma, M. H., Deveci, M., Kadry, S., Nedoma, J., Slany, V., & Martinek, R. (2024). A systematic review of deep learning techniques for plant diseases. Artificial Intelligence Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10944-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.