The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms to identify highly autocorrelated areas: the case of spatial distribution in financially compromised farms
Open accessAbstract
Local Indicators of Spatial Aggregation (LISA) can be used as objectives in a multicriteria framework when highly autocorrelated areas (hot-spots) must be identified and geographically located in complex areas. To do so, a Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm (MOEA) based on SPEA2 (Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm v.2) has been designed to evaluate three different fitness functions (fine-grained strength, the weighted sum of objectives and fuzzy evaluation of weighted objectives) and three LISA methods. MOEA makes it possible to achieve a compromise between spatial econometric methods as it highlights areas where a specific phenomenon shows significantly high autocorrelation. The spatial distribution of financially compromised olive-tree farms in Andalusia (Spain) was selected for analysis and two fuzzy hot-spots were statistically identified and spatially located. Hot-spots can be considered to be spatial fuzzy sets where the spatial units have a membership degree that can also be calculated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.996017 · Cited by 50,053
No free lunch theorems for optimization
Wolpert, D. H., & Macready, W. G. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.585893 · Cited by 14,237
Research works printed but not linked: 48
- Agarwal, D. K., Silander, J. A., Gelfand, A. E., Dewar, R. E., & Mickelson, J. G. (2005). Tropical deforestation in Madagascar: analysis using hierarchical, spatially explicit Bayesian regression models. Ecological Modelling, 185, 105–131. · DOI
- Andrienko, N., & Andrienko, G. (2006). Exploratory analysis of spatial and temporal data: a systematic approach. Berlin: Springer.
- Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association: LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93–115. · DOI · Paper page
- Anselin, L. (2002). Under the hood: issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression. Models of Agricultural Economics, 27, 247–267. · DOI
- Asai, K. (1995). Fuzzy systems for information processing. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
- Assunçao, R., Costa, M., Tavares, A., & Ferreira, S. (2006). Fast detection of arbitrarily shaped disease clusters. Statistics in Medicine, 25, 723–742. · DOI
- Bäck, T. (1996). Evolutionary algorithms in theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press. · DOI
- Barbosa, H. J., & Barreto, A. M. (2001). An interactive genetic algorithm with co-evolution of weights for multiobjective problems. In L. Spector, E. D. Goodman, A. Wu, W. Langdon, H. M. Voigt, M. Gen, S. Sen, M. Dorigo, S. Pezeshk, M. H. Garzon, & E. Burke (Eds.), Proceedings of the genetic and evolutionary computation conference (GECCO’2001) (pp. 203–210), San Francisco, California. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann.
- Baddeley, A., Gregori, P., Mateu, J., Stoica, R., & Stoyan, D. (2006). Case studies in spatial point process modeling. Berlin: Springer. · DOI
- Beirlant, J., Goegebeur, Y., Segers, J., & Teugels, J. (2004). Statistics of extremes: theory and applications. Chichester: Wiley. · DOI · Paper page
- Coello-Coello, C. A., & Lamont, G. B. (2004). Applications of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. Singapore: Word Scientific. · DOI · Paper page
- Coello-Coello, C. A., Lamont, G. B., & Van Veldhuizen, D. A. (2007). Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems. New York: Springer.
- Das, I., & Dennis, J. (1997). A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems. Structural Optimization, 14(1), 63–69. · DOI · Paper page
- De Pinto, A., & Nelson, G. C. (2007). Modelling deforestation and land-use change: sparse data environments. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58(3), 502–516. · DOI
- Emir-Farinas, H., & Francis, R. L. (2005). Demand point aggregation for planar covering location models. Annals of Operation Research, 136, 175–192. · DOI
- Fischer, M. M. (2006). Spatial analysis and geocomputation. Berlin: Springer.
- García-Alonso, C. R., & Pérez-Naranjo, L. (2007). Identification of financially compromised areas in the agrarian sector. In 22nd European conference on operational research book of abstracts (Vol. 1, p. 75).
- Gonçalves, G. E., & Estellita, L. P. (2002). Integrating geographical information systems and multi-criteria methods: a case study. Annals of Operation Research, 116, 243–269. · DOI
- Griffith, D. A. (2003). Using estimated missing spatial data with the 2-median model. Annals of Operation Research, 122, 233–247. · DOI
- Gutiérrez, P. A., López-Granados, F., Peña-Barragán, J. M., Jurado-Expósito, M., Gómez-Casero, M. T., & Hervás-Martínez, C. (2008). Mapping sunflower yield as affected by Ridolfia segetum patches and elevation by applying evolutionary product unit neural networks to remote sensed data. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 60(2), 122–132. · DOI
- Hajela, P., & Lin, C. Y. (1992). Genetic search strategies in multicriterion optimal design. Structural Optimization, 4, 99–107. · DOI
- Hodgson, M. J., & Jacobsen, S. K. (2009). A hierarchical location-allocation model with travel based on expected referral distances. Annals of Operation Research, 167, 271–286. · DOI
- Hof, J., & Bevers, M. (2000). Direct spatial optimization in natural resource management: four linear programming examples. Annals of Operation Research, 95, 67–81. · DOI
- Holloway, G., Lacombe, D., & LeSage, J. P. (2007). Spatial econometric issues for bio-economic and land-use modelling. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58(3), 549–588. · DOI
- Horn, J., Nafpliotis, N., & Goldberg, D. E. (1994). A niched Pareto genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization. In Proceedings of the first IEEE conference on evolutionary computation, IEEE World congress on computational intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 82–87). Piscataway: IEEE Service Center. · DOI
- Ishbuchi, H., & Murata, T. (1996). Multi-objective local search algorithm and its applications to flowshop scheduling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 28(3), 392–403. · DOI · Paper page
- Ishibuchi, H., & Murata, T. (1998). Multi-objective genetic local search algorithm and its application to flowshop scheduling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 28(3), 392–403. · DOI · Paper page
- Kalyanmoy, D. (2004). Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Chichester: Wiley.
- Kursawe, F. (1991). A variant of evolution strategies for vector optimization. In H. P. Schwefel & R. Männer (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 496. Parallel problem solving from nature. 1st workshop, PPSN I (pp. 193–197), Dortmund, Germany. Berlin: Springer. · DOI · Paper page
- Laumanns, M., Thiele, L., & Zitzler, E. (2006). An efficient, adaptive parameter variation scheme for metaheuristics based on the epsilon-constraint method. European Journal of Operational Research, 169, 932–942. · DOI
- Lee, M. A., & Esbensen, H. (1997). Fuzzy/multiobjective genetic systems for intelligent systems design tools and components. In W. Pedrycz (Ed.), Fuzzy evolutionary computation. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
- Loughlin, D. H., & Ranjithan, S. (1997). The neighborhood constraint method: a genetic algorithm-based multiobjective optimization technique. In T. Bäck (Ed.), Proceedings of the seventh international conference on genetic algorithms (pp. 666–673). San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann.
- Michalewicz, Z., & Schoenauer, M. (1996). Evolutionary algorithms for constrained parameter optimization problems. Evolutionary Computation, 4(1), 1–32. · DOI · Paper page
- Moreno, B., García-Alonso, C. R., Negrín-Hernández, M. A., Torres-González, F., & Salvador-Carulla, L. (2008). Spatial analysis to identify hotspots of prevalence of schizophrenia. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. doi: 10.1007//s00127-008-0368-3 . · DOI
- Noyan, N. (2010). Alternate risk measures for emergency medical service system design. Annals of Operation Research. doi: 10.1007/s10479-010-0787-x . · DOI
- Ord, J. K., & Getis, A. (1995). Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: distributional issues and an application. Geographical Analysis, 27, 286–306. · DOI
- Pérez-Naranjo, L. M., & García-Alonso, C. R. (2005). Spatial income distribution of horticultural farms in Andalusia. Cuadernos Geográficos, 37, 41–58.
- Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. London: Chapman and Hall. · DOI · Paper page
- Smith, A. E., & Coit, D. W. (1997). Constrain handling techniques—penalty functions. In T. Bäck, D. B. Fogel, & Z. Michalewicz (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary computation. London: Oxford University Press.
- Srigiriraju, K. C. (2000). Noninferior surface tracing evolutionary algorithm (NSTEA) for multi objective optimization. Master’s thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
- Staal, S. J., Baltenweck, L., Waithaka, M., de Wolff, T., & Njoroge, L. (2002). Location and uptake: integrated household and GIS analysis of technology adoption and land use with application to smallholder dairy farms in Kenya. Agricultural Economics, 27, 295–315. · DOI
- Tavares-Pereira, F., Rui Figueira, J., Mousseau, V., & Roy, B. (2007). Multiple criteria districting problems: the public transportation network pricing system of the Paris region. Annals of Operation Research, 154, 69–92. · DOI
- Wang, G., & Terpenny, J. P. (2005). Interactive preference incorporation in evolutionary engineering design. In Y. Jin (Ed.), Knowledge incorporation in evolutionary computation. Berlin: Springer.
- Wilson, P. B., & MacLeod, M. D. (1993). Low implementation cost IIR digital filter design using genetic algorithms. In IEE/IEEE workshop on natural algorithms in signal processing (pp. 4/1–4/8). Chelmsford, UK.
- Youssef, H. A., Kinsella, A., & Waddington, J. L. (1991). Evidence for geographical variations in the prevalence of schizophrenia in rural Ireland. Archives of General Psychiatry, 48, 254–258. · DOI
- Zitzler, E., & Thiele, L. (1999). Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and strength Pareto approach. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 3(4), 257–271. · DOI · Paper page
- Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., & Thiele, L. (2001). SPEA2: improving the strength of Pareto evolutionary algorithm. In K. Giannakoglou, D. Tsahalis, J. Periaux, P. Papailou, & T. Fogarty (Eds.), Evolutionary methods for design, optimization and control with applications to industrial problems (EUROGEN 2001), Athens.
- Zydallis, J. B., Veldhuizen, D. A. V., & Lamont, G. B. (2001). Statistical comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms including the MOMGA–II. In E. Zitzler, K. Deb, L. Thiele, C. A. C. Coello, & D. Corne (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 1993. First international conference on evolutionary multi-criterion optimization (pp. 226–240). Berlin: Springer. · DOI
Cited by
Charoentong, P., Finotello, F., Angelova, M., Mayer, C., Efremova, M., Rieder, D., Hackl, H., & Trajanoski, Z. (2017) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.019 · Cited by 5,041
McGinnis, C. S., Murrow, L. M., & Gartner, Z. J. (2019) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2019.03.003 · Cited by 4,521
Slingshot: cell lineage and pseudotime inference for single-cell transcriptomics
Street, K., Risso, D., Fletcher, R. B., Das, D., Ngai, J., Yosef, N., Purdom, E., & Dudoit, S. (2018) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-018-4772-0 · Cited by 3,159
Rives, A., Meier, J., Sercu, T., Goyal, S., Lin, Z., Liu, J., Guo, D., Ott, M., Zitnick, C. L., Ma, J., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2016239118 · Cited by 3,286
Single-Cell Map of Diverse Immune Phenotypes in the Breast Tumor Microenvironment
Azizi, E., Carr, A. J., Plitas, G., Cornish, A. E., Konopacki, C., Prabhakaran, S., Nainys, J., Wu, K., Kiseliovas, V., Setty, M., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.060 · Cited by 1,976
Metadata
- Authors
- García-Alonso, C. R., Pérez-Naranjo, L. M., & Fernández-Caballero, J. C.
- Venue
- Annals of Operations Research
- Published
- 2011-01-20
- Volume
- 219
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 187-202
- ISSN
- 0254-5330 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9338
- OpenAlex
- W2060300932
- Cited by
- 1,353
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms to identify highly autocorrelated areas: the case of spatial distribution in financially compromised farms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10479-011-0841-3
- The paper
- García-Alonso, C. R., Pérez-Naranjo, L. M., & Fernández-Caballero, J. C. (2014). Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms to identify highly autocorrelated areas: the case of spatial distribution in financially compromised farms. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-0841-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.