The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Expanding the Domains of Attitudes Towards Evidence-Based Practice: The Evidence Based Practice Attitude Scale-50
Open accessAbstract
Mental health and social service provider attitudes toward evidence-based practice have been measured through the development and validation of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS; Aarons, Ment Health Serv Res 6(2):61-74, 2004). Scores on the EBPAS scales are related to provider demographic characteristics, organizational characteristics, and leadership. However, the EBPAS assesses only four domains of attitudes toward EBP. The current study expands and further identifies additional domains of attitudes towards evidence-based practice. A qualitative and quantitative mixed-methods approach was used to: (1) generate items from multiples sources (researcher, mental health program manager, clinician/therapist), (2) identify potential content domains, and (3) examine the preliminary domains and factor structure through exploratory factor analysis. Participants for item generation included the investigative team, a group of mental health program managers (n = 6), and a group of clinicians/therapists (n = 8). For quantitative analyses a sample of 422 mental health service providers from 65 outpatient programs in San Diego County completed a survey that included the new items. Eight new EBPAS factors comprised of 35 items were identified. Factor loadings were moderate to large and internal consistency reliabilities were fair to excellent. We found that the convergence of these factors with the four previously identified evidence-based practice attitude factors (15 items) was small to moderate suggesting that the newly identified factors represent distinct dimensions of mental health and social service provider attitudes toward adopting EBP. Combining the original 15 items with the 35 new items comprises the EBPAS 50-item version (EBPAS-50) that adds to our understanding of provider attitudes toward adopting EBPs. Directions for future research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Other approaches to assessing readiness have focused on organizational culture, climate, and work attitudes [73], and on providers’ attitudes towards evidence-based practices [21,22,74].”
From Writing implementation research grant proposals: ten key ingredients (2012) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Investigators can also document that few providers adopt evidence-based treatments [21,22], that evidence-based treatments or programs have limited reach [23], or that penetration [24] into a system of care can be addressed by the implementation study.”
From Writing implementation research grant proposals: ten key ingredients (2012) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 25,810
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.
Longford, N. T., Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2075823 · Cited by 18,773
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods
Davidian, M. (2003) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2003.s288 · Cited by 13,820
Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations
GREENHALGH, T., ROBERT, G., MACFARLANE, F., BATE, P., & KYRIAKIDOU, O. (2004) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.0887-378x.2004.00325.x · Cited by 7,448
O’connor, B. P. (2000) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03200807 · Cited by 4,116
Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain.
Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432 · Cited by 3,270
What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence‐based practice
Grol, R., & Wensing, M. (2004) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb05948.x · Cited by 1,378
Aarons, G. A. (2004) · Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1023/b:mhsr.0000024351.12294.65 · Cited by 1,272
Self-citationFrambach, R. T., & Schillewaert, N. (2002) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(00)00152-1 · Cited by 1,270
The Blended Value Proposition: Integrating Social and Financial Returns
Emerson, J. (2003) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41166187 · Cited by 834
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Abril, R. M. (2007). The dissemination and adoption of knowledge management practices behavioural model. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(2), 131–142.
- Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusions of Innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors
Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. M. (2011) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7 · Cited by 3,240
Self-citationMethods to Improve the Selection and Tailoring of Implementation Strategies
Powell, B. J., Beidas, R. S., Lewis, C. C., Aarons, G. A., McMillen, J. C., Proctor, E. K., & Mandell, D. S. (2017) · The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research · doi:10.1007/s11414-015-9475-6 · Cited by 967
Self-citationSocial Network Analysis for Program Implementation
Valente, T. W., Palinkas, L. A., Czaja, S., Chu, K.-H., & Brown, C. H. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131712 · Cited by 332
Aarons, G. A., Glisson, C. A., Green, P. D., Hoagwood, K., Kelleher, K. J., & Landsverk, J. A. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-56 · Cited by 289
Self-citationTilson, J. K., Kaplan, S. L., Harris, J., Hutchinson, A., Ilić, D., Niederman, R., Potomková, J., & Zwolsman, S. E. (2011) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/1472-6920-11-78 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Aarons, G. A., Cafri, G., Lugo, L., & Sawitzky, A.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Aarons, Gregory A.
- Venue
- Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
- Published
- 2010-07-07
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 331-340
- ISSN
- 0894-587X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3289
- PMC
- PMC3411301
- OpenAlex
- W2148396898
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 7.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (P30MH074678, R01MH072961)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- evidence-based practice, provider attitudes, scale development, factor structure, mental health service providers, social service providers, item generation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Attitude of Health Personnel, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Focus Groups, Evidence-Based Practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
