Cited by 1,270Innovation Diffusion and ForecastingTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourInnovation and Knowledge Management

Organizational innovation adoption: a multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research

Frambach, Ruud T, Schillewaert, Niels·2002·Journal of Business Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0148-2963(00)00152-1

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A key extra-organizational feature that may encourage the implementation of EBPs is the network of organizations with which agencies are involved.

    “A key extra-organizational feature that may encourage the implementation of EBPs is the network of organizations with which agencies are involved”

    From Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors (2011) · cites this paper as Frambach and Schillewaert 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frambach, R. T., & Schillewaert, N.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Frambach, Ruud T
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-02
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
163-176
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973333957
Cited by
1,270
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 64
FWCI
26.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
technology acceptance, multi-level framework, adoption decision-making, new product marketing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review