The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting Program Start-Up Using the Stages of Implementation Measure
Open accessAbstract
Recent efforts to better understand the process of implementation have been hampered by a lack of tools available to define and measure implementation progress. The Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC) was developed as part of an implementation trial of MTFC in 53 sites, and identifies the duration of time spent on implementation activities and the proportion of activities completed. This article examines the ability of the first three stages of the SIC (Engagement, Consideration of Feasibility, Readiness Planning) to predict successful program start-up. Results suggest that completing SIC stages completely, yet relatively quickly, predicts the likelihood of successful implementation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In order to apply social network theory and methods to implementation, we note first that implementation can be considered a developmental process, a transition through known stages [1, 34].”
From Social Network Analysis for Program Implementation (2015) · cites this paper as [34]
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, it is likely that broad systems for measuring implementation process through key milestones, quality, and quantity, such as those identified in the Stages of Implementation Completion [86–88], or similar unobtrusive measures [89] can be used to measure implementation fidelity and progress in diverse conditions.”
From “Scaling-out” evidence-based interventions to new populations or new health care delivery systems (2017) · cites this paper as [87]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_37 · Cited by 26,297
Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-4558 · Cited by 10,537
Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis
Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316801 · Cited by 7,344 · cited 1×
“Analytic Strategy To determine if there were similarities among counties that predicted their success in starting an MTFC program, an agglomerative hierarchical clustering method was used (Kaufman and Rousseeuw 1990).”
MethodEvaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.
Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S. M. (1999) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322 · Cited by 7,217
(2005) · Cited by 3,748
Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors
Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. M. (2011) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7 · Cited by 3,240 · cited 2×
“Recently, there has been an increased effort to understand what steps in the implementation process are essential to effectively transport EBPs to a diverse range of communities, and how to best measure if these steps have occurred well (Aarons et al. 2010; Glasgow et al. 1999).”
BackgroundProctor, E. K., Landsverk, J., Aarons, G., Chambers, D., Glisson, C., & Mittman, B. (2009) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-008-0197-4 · Cited by 1,894
Mixed method designs in implementation research
Palinkas, L. A., Aarons, G. A., Horwitz, S., Chamberlain, P., Hurlburt, M., & Landsverk, J. (2011) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0314-z · Cited by 1,187
Self-citationBlueprints for Violence Prevention
Mihalic, S. W., Irwin, K., Elliott, D. S., Fagan, A. A., & Hansen, D. C. (2001) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e304162003-001 · Cited by 497
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Fixsen, D., & Blase, K. (2009). Implementation: The missing link between research and practice. NIRN implementation brief, 1. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
“Scaling-out” evidence-based interventions to new populations or new health care delivery systems
Aarons, G. A., Sklar, M., Mustanski, B., Benbow, N., & Brown, C. H. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0640-6 · Cited by 399
Self-citationSocial Network Analysis for Program Implementation
Valente, T. W., Palinkas, L. A., Czaja, S., Chu, K.-H., & Brown, C. H. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131712 · Cited by 332
Chamberlain, P., Brown, C. H., & Saldana, L. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-116 · Cited by 262
Self-citationWilliams, N. J., & Beidas, R. S. (2019) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12960 · Cited by 233
Tracking implementation strategies: a description of a practical approach and early findings
Bunger, A. C., Powell, B. J., Robertson, H. A., MacDowell, H., Birken, S. A., & Shea, C. (2017) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-017-0175-y · Cited by 208
Metadata
- Authors
- Saldana, L., Chamberlain, P., Wang, W., & Hendricks Brown, C.
- Affiliations
- University of South Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Saldana, Lisa
- Venue
- Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
- Published
- 2011-06-28
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 419-425
- ISSN
- 0894-587X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3289
- PMC
- PMC3212640
- OpenAlex
- W1995981850
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH076158, R25MH080916)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (P30DA023920, K23DA021603)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Keywords
- program implementation, implementation readiness, feasibility assessment, mental health services
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, California, Community Mental Health Services, Forecasting, Foster Home Care, Health Plan Implementation, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Ohio, Program Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
