Cited by 126Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health Treatment and Access

Dual diagnosis capability in mental health and addiction treatment services: An assessment of programs across multiple state systems

Open access
McGovern, Mark P., Lambert-Harris, Chantal, Gotham, Heather J., Claus, Ronald E., Xie, Haiyi·2014·Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Abstract

Despite increased awareness of the benefits of integrated services for persons with co-occurring substance use and psychiatric disorders, estimates of the availability of integrated services vary widely. The present study utilized standardized measures of program capacity to address co-occurring disorders, the dual diagnosis capability in addiction treatment and dual diagnosis capability in mental health treatment indexes, and sampled 256 programs across the United States. Approximately 18 % of addiction treatment and 9 % of mental health programs met criteria for dual diagnosis capable services. This is the first report on public access to integrated services using objective measures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10488-012-0449-1

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sequential or parallel treatments have produced health improvements but are generally considered suboptimal and less effective than integrated care for A-SUD.

    “These approaches have historically led to health improvement, but are not considered optimal and generally underperform relative to integrated care for A-SUD(Brewer et al., 2017; Fantuzzi & Mezzina, 2020; McGovern et al., 2014; Mueser, 2003; Spivak et al., 2020).”

    From A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for persons with comorbid anxiety and substance use disorders (2024) · cites this paper as McGovern et al., 2014

    The introductory passage labeled Abstract (page unavailable) says integrated treatment for co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders is associated with improved patient outcomes. The Discussion, Summary of Findings (page unavailable) says integrated services should be in place. Neither passage establishes that sequential or parallel treatment historically improved health or directly compares its effectiveness with integrated care; the paper also does not make this claim specifically for A-SUD. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This study supports calls for a more integrated treatment system.

    “Consistent with these trends, this study clearly supports calls for a more integrated treatment system, where programs are focussed on SUD and co-occurring conditions, and clinicians are cross-trained on management of concurrent disorders (McGovern et al., 2014; Drake et al., 2010).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 2002 Report to congress on the prevention and treatment of co-occurring substance abuse disorders and mental disorders (November edition) Rockville, MD SAMHSA, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGovern, M. P., Lambert-Harris, C., Gotham, H. J., Claus, R. E., & Xie, H.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
  • Westat (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
McGovern, Mark P.
Venue
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Published
2012-11-27
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
205-214
ISSN
  • 0894-587X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3289
OpenAlex
W2079686590
Cited by
126
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA027650)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
dual diagnosis, co-occurring disorders, addiction treatment programs, program capacity, service availability, substance use disorders, mental illness
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Humans, Mental Health Services, United States, Substance Abuse Treatment Centers, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review