Cited by 181Policing Practices and PerceptionsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health Treatment and Access

Co-responding Police-Mental Health Programs: A Review

Shapiro, G. K., Cusi, A., Kirst, M., O’Campo, P., Nakhost, A., Stergiopoulos, V.·2015·Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Abstract

Co-responding police-mental health programs are increasingly used to respond to 'Emotionally Disturbed Persons' in the community; however, there is limited understanding of program effectiveness and the mechanisms that promote program success. The academic and gray literature on co-responding police-mental health programs was reviewed. This review synthesized evidence of outcomes along seven dimensions, and the available evidence was further reviewed to identify potential mechanisms of program success. Co-responding police-mental health programs were found to have strong linkages with community services and reduce pressure on the justice system, but there is limited evidence on other impacts. The relevance of these findings for practitioners and the major challenges of this program model are discussed, and future research directions are identified.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10488-014-0594-9

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The empirical literature suggests that CIT and co-response program innovations have beneficial effects by reducing arrests and detention rates, but evidence is mixed on whether these programs are cost-effective.

    “In general, this empirical literature suggests that these program innovations have beneficial effects by reducing arrests and detention rates, but evidence is mixed on whether these programs are cost-effective.”
  • There is not currently credible, causal evidence on the effects of initiatives to improve police training and cooperation with health professionals or community response models.

    “Although each of these programmatic models is grounded in a sensible theory of change, there is not currently credible, causal evidence on their effects (5, 7, 20, 24–26, 28).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shapiro, G. K., Cusi, A., Kirst, M., O’Campo, P., Nakhost, A., & Stergiopoulos, V.
Affiliations
St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Shapiro, G. K.
Venue
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Published
2014-09-20
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
606-620
ISSN
  • 0894-587X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3289
OpenAlex
W2016097816
Cited by
181
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
FWCI
8.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
community mental health services, program effectiveness
MeSH terms
Ambulances, Community Mental Health Services, Community-Institutional Relations, Crisis Intervention, Emergency Services, Psychiatric, Health Services Research, Humans, Program Evaluation, Police

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review