Cited by 42Health Policy Implementation SciencePsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health and Patient Involvement

Barriers and Facilitators to Sustainment of an Evidence-Based Supported Employment Program

Noel, Valerie A., Bond, Gary R., Drake, Robert E., Becker, Deborah R., McHugo, Gregory J., Swanson, Sarah J., Luciano, Alison E., Greene, Mary Ann·2017·Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Abstract

Large-scale initiatives to expand evidence-based practices are often poorly implemented and rarely endure. The purpose of this study was to identify the perceived barriers and facilitators to sustainment of an evidence-based supported employment program, Individual Placement and Support (IPS). Within a 2-year prospective study of sustainment among 129 IPS programs in 13 states participating in a national learning community, we interviewed IPS team leaders and coded their responses to semi-structured interviews using a conceptual framework adapted from another large-scale implementation study. Leaders in 122 agencies (95%) that sustained their IPS programs identified funding, prioritization, and workforce characteristics as both key facilitators and barriers. Additional key factors were lack of local community supports as a barrier and leadership and structured workflow as facilitators. Within the IPS learning community, team leaders attributed the sustainment of their program to funding, prioritization, workforce, agency leadership, and structured workflow. The actions of the learning community's leadership, state governments, and local programs together may have contributed to the high sustainment rate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10488-016-0778-6

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noel, V. A., Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., Becker, D. R., McHugo, G. J., Swanson, S. J., Luciano, A. E., & Greene, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice (US)
  • Westat (United States) (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Noel, Valerie A.
Venue
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Published
2016-11-28
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
331-338
ISSN
  • 0894-587X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3289
OpenAlex
W2553557590
Cited by
42
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
FWCI
4.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (H133G110161)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
Individual Placement and Support, supported employment, program sustainment, barriers and facilitators, evidence-based practice implementation, mental health services, funding, workforce characteristics, leadership, community support, learning communities
MeSH terms
Government Agencies, Humans, Leadership, Prospective Studies, Residence Characteristics, United States, Program Evaluation, Program Development, Employment, Supported, Workflow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review