Archival assemblages: applying disability studies’ political/relational model to archival description
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One theme in recent rethinking of archival provenance is the use of the concept not as a straightforward path to arrangement and description, but as a means of recognizing and reflecting the contextual construction of an archival collection.
“One theme emerging in the recent rethinking of archival provenance is the use of the concept not as a straightforward path to arrangement and description, but as a means of recognizing and reflecting the contextual construction of an archival collection (Bettivia et al. 2022;Brilmyer 2018;Douglas 2016;Duff and Harris 2002;Millar 2002).”
From Can AI provenance inform archival provenance? (2026) · cites this paper as Brilmyer 2018
Provenance was also rethought because the principle of respect des fonds did not cleanly reflect what happened in archival practice.
“Provenance was also rethought because the principle of respect des fonds did not cleanly reflect what happened in archival practice (Bailey 2013;Brilmyer 2018;2022;Fenyo 1966;Millar 2002;Trace 2020).”
From Can AI provenance inform archival provenance? (2026) · cites this paper as Brilmyer 2018
Cites
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 29,585 · see citing works
Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times
Puar, J. K. (2007) · doi:10.1215/9780822390442 · Cited by 3,128 · see citing works
Kafer, A. (2013) · doi:10.2979/6841.0 · Cited by 2,131 · see citing works
Claiming disability: knowledge and identity
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-6303 · Cited by 1,518 · see citing works
Queering the Catalog: Queer Theory and the Politics of Correction
Drabinski, E. (2013) · The Library Quarterly · doi:10.1086/669547 · Cited by 224 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…expanded these concepts by incorporating critical theory, such as feminist epistemologies, queer theory, and critical race studies to explore normative frameworks within archives (Wurl 2005; Dunbar 2006; Olson 2001; Drabinski 2013; Caswell and Cifor 2016; Lee 2016; Adler 2017; Caswell et al. 2017).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential‘Many tender ties’: The shifting contexts and meanings of the S BLACK bag
Peers, L. (1999) · World Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00438243.1999.9980447 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Can AI provenance inform archival provenance?
Corry, F. (2026) · Cambridge Forum on AI: Culture and Society · doi:10.1017/cfc.2026.10025
“…of archival provenance is the use of the concept not as a straightforward path to arrangement and description, but as a means of recognizing and reflecting the contextual construction of an archival collection (Bettivia et al. 2022; Brilmyer 2018; Douglas 2016; Duff and Harris 2002; Millar 2002).”
- Authors
- Brilmyer, G.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brilmyer, Gracen
- ORCID
- Brilmyer, Gracen
- Venue
- Archival Science
- Published
- 2018-04-02
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 95-118
- ISSN
- 1042-1467 (ISSN-L)
- 1389-0166
- 1573-7519
- OpenAlex
- W2796348514
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 51.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Archives and Museum Informatics (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship@McGill (McGill) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Digital and Traditional Archives Management
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Science and Libraries
- Keywords
- archival description, disability studies, feminist disability studies, intersectionality, disability terminology, reflexivity, normativity, records creation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
