Cited by 2,131Disability Rights and RepresentationFeminist Theory and Gender StudiesGender and Feminist Studies

Feminist, Queer, Crip

Kafer, Alison·2013·Indiana University Press eBooks

Abstract

Shatters accepted notions of feminist, queer, and disabled

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2979/6841.0

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kafer, A.
Corresponding author
Kafer, Alison
Venue
Indiana University Press eBooks
Published
2013
OpenAlex
W584056901
Cited by
2,131
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 497 · 2025: 540 · 2024: 136 · 2023: 129 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 121 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 127 · 2018: 106 · 2017: 156 · 2016: 72 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 6
FWCI
73.46
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Indiana University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
feminism, queer theory, disability studies, intersectionality, feminist theory, disability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review