The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of predictive policing from the perspective of fairness
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Utilizing AI fairness to address bias in risk assessment tools ensures that criminal sentencing decisions are fair [88,281].”
From AI Fairness in Data Management and Analytics: A Review on Challenges, Methodologies and Applications (2023) · cites this paper as [88]
Citations
Cites
A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning
Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3457607 · Cited by 5,812
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501
Fair prediction with disparate impact: a study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments
Chouldechova, A. (2017) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2016.0047 · Cited by 2,159
Bellamy, R. K. E., Dey, K., Hind, M., Hoffman, S. C., Houde, S., Kannan, K., Lohia, P., Martino, J., Mehta, S., Mojsilovic, A., et al. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.01943 · Cited by 1,581
Algorithmic Decision Making and the Cost of Fairness
Corbett-Davies, S., Pierson, E., Feller, A., Goel, S., & Huq, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3097983.3098095 · Cited by 1,149
Fairness definitions explained
Verma, S., & Rubin, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Fairness · doi:10.1145/3194770.3194776 · Cited by 1,124
Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art
Berk, R., Heidari, H., Jabbari, S., Kearns, M., & Roth, A. (2021) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124118782533 · Cited by 988 · cited 1×
“Binns (2018) discusses through the lens of moral and political philosophy the de(cid:12)nitions of \fair" and \non-discriminatory" as they apply to algorithmic decision-making systems.”
BackgroundAI Fairness 360: An extensible toolkit for detecting and mitigating algorithmic bias
Bellamy, R. K. E., Dey, K., Hind, M., Hoffman, S. C., Houde, S., Kannan, K., Lohia, P., Martino, J., Mehta, S., Mojsilović, A., et al. (2019) · IBM Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.1147/jrd.2019.2942287 · Cited by 884
Predictive Policing: The Role of Crime Forecasting in Law Enforcement Operations
Perry, W., McInnis, B., Price, C., Smith, S., & Hollywood, J. (2013) · doi:10.7249/rr233 · Cited by 693
Lum, K., & Isaac, W. (2016) · Significance · doi:10.1111/j.1740-9713.2016.00960.x · Cited by 611
A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learning
Friedler, S. A., Scheidegger, C., Venkatasubramanian, S., Choudhary, S., Hamilton, E. P., & Roth, D. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287589 · Cited by 601
The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Models
Wexler, J., Pushkarna, M., Bolukbasi, T., WATTENBERG, M. P., Viégas, F. B., & Wilson, J. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2019.2934619 · Cited by 597
Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkit
Saleiro, P., Kuester, B., Hinkson, L., London, J., Stevens, A., Anisfeld, A., Rodolfa, K. T., & Ghani, R. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.05577 · Cited by 496
Algorithmic Prediction in Policing: Assumptions, Evaluation, and Accountability
Moses, L. B., & Chan, J. B. L. (2016) · Policing & Society · doi:10.1080/10439463.2016.1253695 · Cited by 453
The Measure and Mismeasure of Fairness
Corbett-Davies, S., Gaebler, J. D., Nilforoshan, H., Shroff, R., & Goel, S. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.00023 · Cited by 444
Randomized Controlled Field Trials of Predictive Policing
Mohler, G. O., Short, M. B., Malinowski, S., Johnson, M., Tita, G. E., Bertozzi, A. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (2015) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2015.1077710 · Cited by 381
Disparate Impact in Big Data PolicingPreprint
Selbst, A. D. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2819182 · Cited by 237
Speicher, T., Heidari, H., Grgic-Hlaca, N., Gummadi, K. P., Singla, A., Weller, A., & Zafar, M. B. (2018) · Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3219819.3220046 · Cited by 207
Fairlearn: A toolkit for assessing and improving fairness in AI
Bird, S., Dudík, M., Edgar, R. J., Horn, B., Lutz, R., Milan, V., Sameki, M., Wallach, H., & Walker, K. (2020) · Cited by 204
Does Predictive Policing Lead to Biased Arrests? Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial
Brantingham, P. J., Valasik, M. A., & Mohler, G. (2018) · Statistics and Public Policy · doi:10.1080/2330443x.2018.1438940 · Cited by 165
Runaway Feedback Loops in Predictive Policing
Ensign, D., Friedler, S. A., Neville, S., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.09847 · Cited by 161
A Moral Framework for Understanding Fair ML through Economic Models of Equality of Opportunity
Heidari, H., Loi, M., Gummadi, K. P., & Krause, A. (2019) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287584 · Cited by 151
The Case for Process Fairness in Learning: Feature Selection for Fair Decision Making
Grgić-Hlača, N., Zafar, M. B., Gummadi, K. P., & Weller, A. (2016) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 137
Bias Mitigation Post-processing for Individual and Group Fairness
Lohia, P., Ramamurthy, K. N., Bhide, M. A., Saha, D., Varshney, K. R., & Puri, R. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2019.8682620 · Cited by 135
AI Ethics in Predictive Policing: From Models of Threat to an Ethics of Care
Asaro, P. (2019) · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine · doi:10.1109/mts.2019.2915154 · Cited by 122
Racial categories in machine learning
Benthall, S., & Haynes, B. D. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287575 · Cited by 110
Transparency in Fair Machine Learning: the Case of Explainable Recommender Systems
Abdollahi, B., & Nasraoui, O. (2018) · Human-computer interaction series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90403-0_2 · Cited by 78
Data in New Delhi's predictive policing system
Marda, V., & Narayan, S. (2020) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372865 · Cited by 69
Nissan, E. (2015) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-015-0596-5 · Cited by 66
Shrestha, Y. R., & Yang, Y. (2019) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a12090199 · Cited by 62
What is wrong about Robocops as consultants? A technology-centric critique of predictive policing
Degeling, M., & Berendt, B. (2017) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-017-0730-7 · Cited by 61
Campedelli, G. M. (2020) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-020-00082-9 · Cited by 49
What Can Political Philosophy Teach Us about Algorithmic Fairness?
Binns, R. (2018) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msp.2018.2701147 · Cited by 47
A Harm-Reduction Framework for Algorithmic Fairness
Altman, M., Wood, A., & Vayena, E. (2018) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msp.2018.2701149 · Cited by 45
Algorithmic Bias in Recidivism Prediction: A Causal Perspective (Student Abstract)
Khademi, A., & Honavar, V. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i10.7192 · Cited by 40
Optimized Data Pre-Processing for Discrimination PreventionPreprint
Calmon, F. P., Wei, D., Ramamurthy, K. N., & Varshney, K. R. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.03354 · Cited by 37
Machine Learning and the Police: Asking the Right Questions
Vestby, A., & Vestby, J. (2019) · Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice · doi:10.1093/police/paz035 · Cited by 35
On the Legal Compatibility of Fairness Definitions
Xiang, A., & Raji, I. D. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.00761 · Cited by 34
Machine Decisions and Human Consequences
Scantamburlo, T., Charlesworth, A., & Cristianini, N. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198838494.003.0003 · Cited by 32
An Empirical Study on Learning Fairness Metrics for COMPAS Data with Human SupervisionPreprint
Wang, H., Grgić-Hlača, N., Lahoti, P., Gummadi, K. P., & Weller, A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.10255 · Cited by 32
To Surveil and Predict: A Human Rights Analysis of Algorithmic Policing in Canada
Robertson, K., Khoo, C., & Song, Y. (2020) · TSpace (University of Toronto) · Cited by 16
What about AI in criminal intelligence? From predictive policing to AI perspectives
Perrot, P. (2017) · European Law Enforcement Research Bulletin · Cited by 15
How to make decisions with algorithms
Persson, A., & Kavathatzopoulos, I. (2018) · ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society · doi:10.1145/3243141.3243154 · Cited by 11
Santos, R. B. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108278423.017 · Cited by 10
Fairness With Minimal Harm: A Pareto-Optimal Approach For HealthcarePreprint
Martínez, N., Bertrán, M., & Sapiro, G. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.06935 · Cited by 10
Artificial Intellegence and Policing: First Questions
Joh, E. E. (2018) · bepress Legal Repository · Cited by 5
Campedelli, G. M. (2019) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/853fx · Cited by 5
How to make decisions with algorithms
Anders, P., & Kavathatzopoulos, I. (2017) · ORBIT Journal · doi:10.29297/orbit.v1i2.44 · Cited by 3
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Bakke E (2018) Predictive policing: the argument for public transparency. NYU Ann Surv Am L 74:131
- Chouldechova A (2017) Fair prediction with disparate impact: a study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments. Big Data 5(2):153–163 · DOI · Paper page
- Ferguson AG (2016) Policing predictive policing. Wash UL Rev 94:1109
- Hardt M, Price E, Srebro N (2016) Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 3315–3323
- Kusner MJ, Loftus J, Russell C, Silva R (2017) Counterfactual fairness. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 4066–4076
- Richardson R, Schultz J, Crawford K (2019) Dirty data, bad predictions: how civil rights violations impact police data, predictive policing systems, and justice. New York University Law Review Online, Forthcoming
- Ridgeway G (2013) The pitfalls of preduction. NIJ J 271:34–40
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Crime Prediction Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning: A Systematic Review and Future Directions
Mandalapu, V., Elluri, L., Vyas, P., & Roy, N. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3286344 · Cited by 201
“biases or lead to discrimination [74], [75].”
AI Fairness in Data Management and Analytics: A Review on Challenges, Methodologies and Applications
Chen, P., Wu, L., & Wang, L. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app131810258 · Cited by 155
A Comprehensive Survey of Deep Learning Approaches in Image Processing
Τρίγκα, Μ., & Dritsas, E. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25020531 · Cited by 174
Explainable AI and Law: An Evidential Survey
Richmond, K. M., Muddamsetty, S. M., Gammeltoft‐Hansen, T., Olsen, H. P., & Moeslund, T. B. (2023) · Digital Society · doi:10.1007/s44206-023-00081-z · Cited by 117
“The present article thus seeks to address limitations in previously published surveys (Alikhademi et al., 2022; Atkinson & Bench-Capon, 2019), centrally the failure to account for the heterogeneous nature of reasoning, adjudication, and administrative decision-making across legal sub-domains.”
Explainable AI for Cyber-Physical Systems: Issues and Challenges
Hoenig, A., Roy, K., Acquaah, Y. T., Yi, S., & Desai, S. S. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3395444 · Cited by 98
“Machine learning models are prone to repeating existing systemic bias from human decision-makers [25].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Alikhademi, K., Drobina, E., Prioleau, D., Richardson, B., Purves, D., & Gilbert, J. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Alikhademi, Kiana
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence and Law
- Published
- 2021-04-15
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-17
- ISSN
- 0924-8463 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-8382
- OpenAlex
- W3155016818
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 35.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2021-08-28)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Artificial Intelligence and Law (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NSF (1917712)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Law › Artificial Intelligence in Law
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Keywords
- predictive policing, algorithmic fairness, indirect discrimination, systemic bias, criminal justice, algorithmic bias, social justice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
