Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predictors and Consequences of Sexual “Hookups” Among College Students: A Short-term Prospective Study

Open access
Fielder, Robyn L., Carey, Michael P.·2010·Archives of Sexual Behavior

Abstract

Abstract“Hookups,” sexual interactions between partners who do not expect a romantic commitment, are believed to be common among adolescents and young adults. Most existing research is cross-sectional and has not investigated the antecedents or consequences of hookups. To our knowledge, this study provides the first prospective investigation of the hypothesized predictors of penetrative sex hookups (i.e., oral, vaginal, and anal sex) and the first exploration of the short-term mental health consequences of hookups. A total of 140 first-semester college students (109 females, 31 males) completed an anonymous survey early in their first semester; the survey assessed 18 potential predictors of hooking up that were identified from theory and past research. At the end of their first semester, students again responded to a survey and provided data on their oral and vaginal sex hookup behavior (occurrence and number of partners), distress, and self-esteem. Baseline and follow-up data were linked using unique codes that protected participants’ anonymity. Pre-college hookup patterns, peak intoxication level, and situational triggers for hookups were consistent predictors of oral and vaginal sex hookup behavior (and number of hookup partners) in the first semester of college. Penetrative sex hookups increased psychological distress for females, but not for males. Implications for education and intervention as well as suggestions for future research are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10508-008-9448-4

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1991). The Self-Esteem scale. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes: Volume 1 of measures of social psychological attitudes (pp. 121–123). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
  2. Jennings, A. M., Salts, C. J., & Smith, T. A. (1991). Attitudes toward marriage: Effects of parent conflict, family structure, and gender. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 17, 67–79. · doi:10.1300/j087v17n01_05
  3. Seaman, B. (2005). Binge: What your college student won’t tell you. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  4. Stepp, L. S. (2007). Unhooked: How young women pursue sex, delay love, and lose at both. New York: Riverhead Books.
  5. Triandis, H. C. (1977). Interpersonal behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Cited by

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P.
Venue
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Published
2009-01-09
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
1105-1119
ISSN
  • 0004-0002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2800
OpenAlex
W2063928734
Cited by
287
References
69
FWCI
32.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictors and Consequences of Sexual “Hookups” Among College Students: A Short-term Prospective Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10508-008-9448-4
The paper
Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010). Predictors and Consequences of Sexual “Hookups” Among College Students: A Short-term Prospective Study. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9448-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.