Cited by 41Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Family Matters: Happiness in Nuclear Families and Twins

Nes, Ragnhild Bang, Czajkowski, N., Tambs, K.·2010·Behavior Genetics

Abstract

Biometric studies have shown that happiness is strongly affected by genes. The findings are mainly based on twin data, however, and the full validity of the results has been debated. To overcome some limitations in classical twin research, we examined aetiological sources of subjective well-being (SWB), using two independent population-based samples, one including nuclear families (N = 54,540) and one including twins (N = 6,620). Biometric modelling using R was conducted to test for a data structure implying either non-additive genetic effects or higher environmental co-twin correlation in MZ than DZ pairs (violation of the EEA). We also estimated non-random mating, cultural transmission and shared environments specific for regular siblings and twins. Two sets of nested models were fitted and compared. The best explanatory model shows that family matters for happiness predominantly due to quantitative sex-specific genetic effects, a moderate spousal correlation and a shared twin environment. Upper limits for broad-sense heritability were estimated to be 0.33 (females) and 0.36 (males). Our study constitutes the most elaborate biometric study of SWB to date and illustrates the utility of including responses from multiple types of relatives in quantitative genetic analyses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10519-010-9365-x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nes, R. B., Czajkowski, N., & Tambs, K.
Affiliations
Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
Corresponding author
Nes, Ragnhild Bang
Venue
Behavior Genetics
Published
2010-05-04
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
577-590
ISSN
  • 0001-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3297
OpenAlex
W1978647884
Cited by
41
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
happiness, subjective well-being, heritability, nuclear family, twins, non-additive genetic effects, shared environment, cultural transmission, non-random mating, sex-specific genetic effects, broad-sense heritability, family environment
MeSH terms
Biometry, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Environment, Female, Happiness, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Norway, Nuclear Family, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Twins, Dizygotic, Twins, Monozygotic, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review