Family Matters: Happiness in Nuclear Families and Twins
Abstract
Biometric studies have shown that happiness is strongly affected by genes. The findings are mainly based on twin data, however, and the full validity of the results has been debated. To overcome some limitations in classical twin research, we examined aetiological sources of subjective well-being (SWB), using two independent population-based samples, one including nuclear families (N = 54,540) and one including twins (N = 6,620). Biometric modelling using R was conducted to test for a data structure implying either non-additive genetic effects or higher environmental co-twin correlation in MZ than DZ pairs (violation of the EEA). We also estimated non-random mating, cultural transmission and shared environments specific for regular siblings and twins. Two sets of nested models were fitted and compared. The best explanatory model shows that family matters for happiness predominantly due to quantitative sex-specific genetic effects, a moderate spousal correlation and a shared twin environment. Upper limits for broad-sense heritability were estimated to be 0.33 (females) and 0.36 (males). Our study constitutes the most elaborate biometric study of SWB to date and illustrates the utility of including responses from multiple types of relatives in quantitative genetic analyses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Five studies, all extended twin designs, report significant non-additive genetic effects.
“Five studies, all extended twin designs, report significant non-additive genetic effects (Bartels and Boomsma 2009; Hahn et al. 2013; Nes et al. 2010a; Stubbe et al. 2005; Tellegen et al. 1988)”
From Genetics of Wellbeing and Its Components Satisfaction with Life, Happiness, and Quality of Life: A Review and Meta-analysis of Heritability Studies (2015) · cites this paper as Nes et al. 2010a
Cites
Extraversion and Its Positive Emotional Core
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1997) · Handbook of Personality Psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-012134645-4/50030-5 · Cited by 1,081 · see citing works
Well–being and affective style: neural substrates and biobehavioural correlates
Davidson, R. J. (2004) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1510 · Cited by 446 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Neurobiological research have for example shown that resilience and wellbeing are associated with high levels of left prefrontal activation, effective modulation of activation in the amygdala and fast recovery in response to negative life events (See Davidson 2004 for a review).”
BackgroundGenetic covariation between neuroticism and the symptoms of anxiety and depression
Jardine, R., Martin, N. G., Henderson, A. S., & Rao, D. C. (1984) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.1370010202 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Hettema, J. M., Prescott, C. A., & Kendler, K. S. (2004) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.9.1581 · Cited by 224 · cited 2× · see citing works
“2002) and generalised anxiety disorder (Hettema et al. 2004) as well as for neuroticism and subthreshold symptoms of anxiety and depression (Jardine et al.”
BackgroundThe Personalities of Twins: Just Ordinary Folks
Johnson, W., Krueger, R. F., Bouchard, T. J., & McGue, M. (2002) · Twin Research · doi:10.1375/1369052022992 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bartels, M. (2015) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10519-015-9713-y · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Beyond the heritability of life satisfaction – The roles of personality and twin-specific influences
Hahn, E., Johnson, W., & Spinath, F. M. (2013) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.07.003 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Genetic and Environmental Multidimensionality of Well- and Ill-Being in Middle Aged Twin Men
Franz, C. E., Panizzon, M. S., Eaves, L. J., Thompson, W., Lyons, M. J., Jacobson, K. C., Tsuang, M., Glatt, S. J., & Kremen, W. S. (2012) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10519-012-9538-x · Cited by 36 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nes, R. B., Czajkowski, N., & Tambs, K.
- Affiliations
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Nes, Ragnhild Bang
- Venue
- Behavior Genetics
- Published
- 2010-05-04
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 577-590
- ISSN
- 0001-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3297
- OpenAlex
- W1978647884
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Behavior Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- happiness, subjective well-being, heritability, nuclear family, twins, non-additive genetic effects, shared environment, cultural transmission, non-random mating, sex-specific genetic effects, broad-sense heritability, family environment
- MeSH terms
- Biometry, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Environment, Female, Happiness, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Norway, Nuclear Family, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Twins, Dizygotic, Twins, Monozygotic, Models, Statistical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review