Cited by 352Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorPersonality Traits and Psychology

Genetic covariation between neuroticism and the symptoms of anxiety and depression

Jardine, R., Martin, N. G., Henderson, A. S., Rao, D. C.·1984·Genetic Epidemiology

Abstract

A genetic analysis of the trait of neuroticism and symptoms of anxiety and depression in 3,810 pairs of adult MZ and DZ twins is reported. Differences between people in these measures can be explained simply by differences in their genes and in their individual environmental experiences. There is no evidence that environmental experiences that are shared by cotwins, such as common family environment or social influences, are important. There are differences between the sexes in gene action affecting neuroticism, and genetic effects become more pronounced with age in females. The lack of evidence for dominance variance affecting neuroticism contrasts well with the detection of considerable genetical nonadditivity for extraversion in the same sample and reinforces the view that these two traits are not only statistically, but also genetically, quite independent. An analysis of the causes of covariation between anxiety, depression, and neuroticism shows that additive gene effects are more important causes of covariation than environmental factors. Genetic variation in symptoms of anxiety and depression is largely dependent on the same factors as effect the neuroticism trait. However, there is also evidence for genetic variation specific to depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gepi.1370010202

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jardine, R., Martin, N. G., Henderson, A. S., & Rao, D. C.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Martin, N. G.
Venue
Genetic Epidemiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-01
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
89-107
ISSN
  • 0741-0395 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2272
OpenAlex
W2118929411
Cited by
351
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Genetic Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
neuroticism, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, genetic covariance, twin studies, monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins, heritability, sex differences, age differences, dominance variance, non-additive genetic effects, extraversion, personality traits
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Biometry, Depression, Diseases in Twins, Environment, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Genetic, Neurotic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Twins, Dizygotic, Twins, Monozygotic, Genetic Variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review