Cited by 218Skin Protection and AgingPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activitiesmelanin and skin pigmentation

Plant extracts and natural compounds used against UVB-induced photoaging

Open access
Cavinato, Maria, Waltenberger, Birgit, Baraldo, Giorgia, Grade, Carla V. C., Stuppner, Hermann, Jansen-Dürr, Pidder·2017·Biogerontology

Abstract

Skin is continuously exposed to a variety of environmental stresses, including ultraviolet (UV) radiation. UVB is an inherent component of sunlight that crosses the epidermis and reaches the upper dermis, leading to increased oxidative stress, activation of inflammatory response and accumulation of DNA damage among other effects. The increase in UVB radiation on earth due to the destruction of stratospheric ozone poses a major environmental threat to the skin, increasing the risk of damage with long-term consequences, such as photoaging and photocarcinogenesis. Extracts from plants and natural compounds have been historically used in traditional medicine in the form of teas and ointments but the effect of most of these compounds has yet to be verified. Regarding the increasing concern of the population with issues related to quality of life and appearance, the cosmetic market for anti-aging and photoprotective products based on natural compounds is continuously growing, and there is increasing requirement of expansion on research in this field. In this review we summarized the most current and relevant information concerning plant extracts and natural compounds that are able to protect or mitigate the deleterious effects caused by photoaging in different experimental models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10522-017-9715-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Natural compounds used against photoaging comprise phenolic compounds including flavonoids, phenolic acids, and stilbenes derived from plants such as tea, grape, bergamot, fernblock, rooibos, grapefruit, and red orange.

    “Natural compounds used against photoaging comprise phenolic compounds, including flavonoids (catechins, isoflavones, proanthocyanidins, and anthocyanins), phenolic acids (benzoic, gallic, and cinnamic acids), and stilbenes derived from plants such as tea, grape, bergamot, fernblock, rooibos, grapefruit, and red orange [4, 88, 90].”

    From Antioxidants from Plants Protect against Skin Photoaging (2018) · cites this paper as [88]

  • Phenolic compounds, ascorbic acid, and carotenoids derived from different plant species are able to protect the skin by preventing UV penetration, reducing inflammation and oxidative stress, and influencing several survival signalling pathways.

    “Phenolic compounds, ascorbic acid and carotenoids, derived from different plant species, are able to protect the skin by preventing UV penetration, reducing inflammation and oxidative stress, and influencing several survival signalling pathways.”

    From Antioxidants from Plants Protect against Skin Photoaging (2018) · cites this paper as [88]

  • Capsanthin and capsorubin from red pepper fruits have protective properties against UVB-induced DNA damage in human dermal fibroblasts.

    “Carotenoids capsanthin and capsorubin from red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fruits have also been found to have protective properties against UVB-induced DNA damage in human dermal fibroblasts [88, 108].”

    From Antioxidants from Plants Protect against Skin Photoaging (2018) · cites this paper as [88]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 218

Authors
Cavinato, M., Waltenberger, B., Baraldo, G., Grade, C. V. C., Stuppner, H., & Jansen-Dürr, P.
Affiliations
  • Universität Innsbruck (AT)
  • Universidade Federal da Integração Latino-Americana (BR)
Corresponding author
Cavinato, Maria
Venue
Biogerontology
Published
2017-07-12
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
499-516
ISSN
  • 1389-5729 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6768
OpenAlex
W2734749797
Cited by
218
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biogerontology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Library of the University of Innsbruck (University of Innsbruck) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • CNPq (201892/2012-0)
  • Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft (FP7 FRAILOMIC, 848474)
  • Austrian and Tyrolean Science Funds (FWF P-28039)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
Keywords
UV-B radiation, photoaging, plant extracts, natural compounds, photoprotection, anti-aging cosmetics, oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammation, photocarcinogenesis, stratospheric ozone depletion, traditional medicine
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Products, Cosmetics, Humans, Plant Extracts, Skin, Sunlight, Ultraviolet Rays, Signal Transduction, Skin Aging, Risk Assessment, Models, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review