Cited by 3Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsSilk-based biomaterials and applicationsPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Erratum to: Hydroxyapatite/regenerated silk fibroin scaffold-enhanced osteoinductivity and osteoconductivity of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells

Open access
Jiang, Jia, Hao, Wei, Li, Yuzhuo, Yao, Jinrong, Shao, Zhengzhong, Li, Hong, Yang, Jianjun, Chen, Shiyi·2013·Biotechnology Letters

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10529-013-1166-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jiang, J., Hao, W., Li, Y., Yao, J., Shao, Z., Li, H., Yang, J., & Chen, S.
Affiliations
Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Shiyi
Venue
Biotechnology Letters
Published
2013-06-07
Volume
35
Issue
8
Pages
1349-1350
ISSN
  • 0141-5492 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6776
OpenAlex
W4241846485
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Biotechnology Letters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Keywords
hydroxyapatite, regenerated silk fibroin, scaffolds, osteoinductivity, osteoconductivity, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells, bone tissue engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review