The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The link between international trade and the global distribution of invasive alien species
Open accessAbstract
Invasive alien species (IAS) exact large biodiversity and economic costs and are a significant component of human-induced, global environmental change. Previous studies looking at the variation in alien species across regions have been limited geographically or taxonomically or have not considered economics. We used a global invasive species database to regress IAS per-country on a suite of socioeconomic, ecological, and biogeographical variables. We varied the countries included in the regression tree analyses, in order to explore whether certain outliers were biasing the results, and in most of the cases, merchandise imports was the most important explanatory variable. The greater the degree of international trade, the higher the number of IAS. We also found a positive relationship between species richness and the number of invasives, in accord with other investigations at large spatial scales. Island status (overall), country area, latitude, continental position (New World versus Old World) or other measures of human disturbance (e.g., GDP per capita, population density) were not found to be important determinants of a country’s degree of biological invasion, contrary to previous studies. Our findings also provide support to the idea that more resources for combating IAS should be directed at the introduction stage and that novel trade instruments need to be explored to account for this environmental externality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R., & Morrison, D. (2005) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002 · Cited by 4,771
Cited by
Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization
Hulme, P. E. (2009) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01600.x · Cited by 2,615
Framing Sustainability in a Telecoupled World
Liu, J., Hull, V., Batistella, M., DeFries, R., Dietz, T., Fu, F., Hertel, T. W., Izaurralde, R. C., Lambin, E. F., Li, S., et al. (2013) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-05873-180226 · Cited by 1,099
Global threat to agriculture from invasive species
Paini, D. R., Sheppard, A. W., Cook, D. C., De Barro, P. J., Worner, S. P., & Thomas, M. B. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1602205113 · Cited by 927
Global forecasts of shipping traffic and biological invasions to 2050
Sardain, A., Sardain, E., & Leung, B. (2019) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0245-y · Cited by 466
Historical Accumulation of Nonindigenous Forest Pests in the Continental United States
Aukema, J. E., McCullough, D. G., Von Holle, B., Liebhold, A. M., Britton, K., & Frankel, S. J. (2010) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2010.60.11.5 · Cited by 454
Metadata
- Authors
- Westphal, M. I., Browne, M., MacKinnon, K., & Noble, I.
- Venue
- Biological Invasions
- Published
- 2007-07-27
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 391-398
- ISSN
- 1387-3547 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1464
- OpenAlex
- W2006734068
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The link between international trade and the global distribution of invasive alien species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10530-007-9138-5
- The paper
- Westphal, M. I., Browne, M., MacKinnon, K., & Noble, I. (2008). The link between international trade and the global distribution of invasive alien species. Biological Invasions. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-007-9138-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.