Cited by 1,099Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesSustainable Development and Environmental PolicySustainability and Climate Change Governance

Framing Sustainability in a Telecoupled World

Open access
Liu, Jianguo, Hull, Vanessa, Batistella, Mateus, DeFries, Ruth, Dietz, Thomas, Fu, Feng, Hertel, Thomas W., Izaurralde, R. Cesar +15 more·2013·Ecology and Society

Abstract

Liu, J., V. Hull, M. Batistella, R. DeFries, T. Dietz, F. Fu, T. W. Hertel, R. C. Izaurralde, E. F. Lambin, S. Li, L. A. Martinelli, W. J. McConnell, E. F. Moran, R. Naylor, Z. Ouyang, K. R. Polenske, A. Reenberg, G. de Miranda Rocha, C. S. Simmons, P. H. Verburg, P. M. Vitousek, F. Zhang, and C. Zhu. 2013. Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecology and Society 18(2): 26. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05873-180226

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5751/es-05873-180226

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Aker, J. 2008. Does digital divide or provide? The impact of cell phones on grain markets in Niger. Working Paper 154, Center for Global Development, Washington, D.C., USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1093374 · DOI
  2. Alberti, M., H. Asbjornsen, L. A. Baker, N. Brozovic, L. E. Drinkwater, S. A. Drzyzga, C. A. Jantz, J. Fragoso, D. S. Holland, T. A. Kohler, J. Liu, W. J. McConnell, H. D. G. Ecology and Society 18(2): 26 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss2/art26/
  3. S0100-204X2006000300011 · DOI
  4. Banse, M., H. van Meijl, A. Tabeau, and G. Woltjer. 2008. Will EU biofuel policies affect global agricultural markets? European Review of Agricultural Economics 35:117-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbn023 · DOI
  5. Batistella, M., and E. L. Bolfe. 2010. Elos de Cooperação. Pages 9-12 in M. Batistella and E. L. Bolfe, editors. Paralelos: Corredor de Nacala. v. 1. Embrapa Monitoramento por Satélite, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. [online] URL: http:// www.cnpm.embrapa.br/projetos/mocambique/download/ ebook_paralelos/Livro_Paralelos.html
  6. Brainard, L., and J. H. Welch. 2012. Brazil and China: clouds on the horizon. America's Quarterly, 24 January. [online URL: http://www.americasquarterly.org/node/3255
  7. Callaway, R. M., and W. M. Ridenour. 2004. Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2:436-443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0436:NWISAT] 2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  8. Hertel, T. W., and T. Mirza. 2009. The role of trade facilitation in South Asian economic integration. Pages 12-39 in Study on intraregional trade and investment in South Asia. The Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines.
  9. Konar, M., C. Dalin, S. Suweis, N. Hanasaki, A. Rinaldo, and I. Rodriguez-Iturbe. 2011. Water for food: the global virtual water trade network. Water Resources Research 47:W05520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010307 · DOI
  10. Liu, J., W. McConnell, and T. Baerwald, organizers. 2011. Symposium on "Telecoupling of Human and Natural Systems" at the meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. [online] URL: http://aaas.confex. com/aaas/2011/webprogram/Session2889.html · DOI · Paper page
  11. Macedo, M. N., R. S. DeFries, D. C. Morton, C. M. Stickler, G. L. Galford, and Y. E. Shimabukuro. 2012. Decoupling of deforestation and soy production in the southern Amazon during the late 2000s. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109:1341-1346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1111374109 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Nelson, G. C. 2005. Drivers of ecosystem change: summary chapter. Pages 73-76 in R. Hassan, R. Scholes, and N. Ash, editors. Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Island Press, Washington, D.C. USA.
  13. Ostrom, E. 2011. Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal 39:7-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. Zhu, C., and G. Feng. 2003. Case studies of policies and management of the green for grain programme in China. [Title translated from Chinese.] Science Press, Beijing, China.
  15. Zhu, C., R. Taylor, and G. Feng. 2004. China's wood market, trade and the environment. Science Press USA, Monmouth Junction, New Jersey, USA. References

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, J., Hull, V., Batistella, M., DeFries, R., Dietz, T., Fu, F., Hertel, T. W., Izaurralde, R. C., Lambin, E. F., Li, S., Martinelli, L. A., McConnell, W. J., Moran, E. F., Naylor, R., Ouyang, Z., Polenske, K. R., Reenberg, A., de Miranda Rocha, G., Simmons, C. S., Verburg, P. H., Vitousek, P. M., Zhang, F., & Zhu, C.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Embrapa (BR)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • China Agricultural University (CN)
  • International Union for Conservation of Nature (United States) (US)
Venue
Ecology and Society
Published
2013
Volume
18
Issue
2
ISSN
1708-3087 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158700333
Cited by
1,099
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 81 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 121 · 2018: 88 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 9
FWCI
45.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Ecology and Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Michigan State University
  • Office of Science
  • College of Engineering, Michigan State University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Keywords
sustainability, telecoupling, sustainability framing, global change, sustainability science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review