The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R., & Morrison, D. (2005) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002 · Cited by 4,771
Mammal invaders on islands: impact, control and control impact
COURCHAMP, F., CHAPUIS, J., & PASCAL, M. (2003) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793102006061 · Cited by 1,067
Dispersal and germination ofProsopis flexuosa(Fabaceae) seeds by desert mammals in Argentina
Campos, C. M., & Ojeda, R. A. (1997) · Journal of Arid Environments · doi:10.1006/jare.1996.0196 · Cited by 171
Cited by
Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe
Massei, G., Kindberg, J., Licoppe, A., Gačić, D., Šprem, N., Kamler, J., Baubet, E., Hohmann, U., Monaco, A., Ozoliņš, J., et al. (2015) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.3965 · Cited by 786
Animal domestication in the era of ancient genomics
Frantz, L. A. F., Bradley, D. G., Larson, G., & Orlando, L. (2020) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-0225-0 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Barrios-Garcia, M. N., & Ballari, S. A.
- Venue
- Biological Invasions
- Published
- 2012-04-29
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2283-2300
- ISSN
- 1387-3547 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1464
- OpenAlex
- W2460261456
- Cited by
- 763
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10530-012-0229-6
- The paper
- Barrios-Garcia, M. N., & Ballari, S. A. (2012). Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review. Biological Invasions. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0229-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
