The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe
Abstract
Across Europe, wild boar numbers increased in the 1960s–1970s but stabilised in the 1980s; recent evidence suggests that the numbers and impact of wild boar has grown steadily since the 1980s. As hunting is the main cause of mortality for this species, we reviewed wild boar hunting bags and hunter population trends in 18 European countries from 1982 to 2012. Hunting statistics and numbers of hunters were used as indicators of animal numbers and hunting pressure. The results confirmed that wild boar increased consistently throughout Europe, while the number of hunters remained relatively stable or declined in most countries. We conclude that recreational hunting is insufficient to limit wild boar population growth and that the relative impact of hunting on wild boar mortality had decreased. Other factors, such as mild winters, reforestation, intensification of crop production, supplementary feeding and compensatory population responses of wild boar to hunting pressure might also explain population growth. As populations continue to grow, more human–wild boar conflicts are expected unless this trend is reversed. New interdisciplinary approaches are urgently required to mitigate human–wild boar conflicts, which are otherwise destined to grow further. © 2014 Crown copyright. Pest Management Science © 2014 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review
Barrios-Garcia, M. N., & Ballari, S. A. (2012) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-012-0229-6 · Cited by 763
SCHLEY, L., & ROPER, T. J. (2003) · Mammal Review · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2907.2003.00010.x · Cited by 554
Linnell, J. D. C., Swenson, J. E., & Anderson, R. (2001) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1017/s1367943001001408 · Cited by 502
BIEBER, C., & RUF, T. (2005) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01094.x · Cited by 393
Patterns of crop damage by wild boar (Sus scrofa)in Luxembourg over a 10-year period
Schley, L., Dufrêne, M., Krier, A., & Frantz, A. C. (2008) · European Journal of Wildlife Research · doi:10.1007/s10344-008-0183-x · Cited by 266
Biogeographical variation in the population density of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in western Eurasia
Melis, C., Szafrańska, P. A., Jędrzejewska, B., & Bartoń, K. (2006) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01434.x · Cited by 200
Jędrzejewska, B., Jędrzejewski, W., Bunevich, A. N., Miłkowski, L., & Krasiński, Z. A. (1997) · Acta Theriologica · doi:10.4098/at.arch.97-39 · Cited by 198
Servanty, S., Gaillard, J.-M., Ronchi, F., Focardi, S., Baubet, É., & Gimenez, O. (2011) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02017.x · Cited by 186
PREY SELECTION AND PREDATION BY WOLVES IN BIAŁOWIEŻA PRIMEVAL FOREST, POLAND
Jędrzejewski, W., Jędrzejewska, B., Okarma, H., Schmidt, K., Zub, K., & Musiani, M. (2000) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1644/1545-1542(2000)081<0197:psapbw>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 182
Jędrzejewski, W., Jędrzejewska, B., Okarma, H., & Ruprecht, A. L. (1992) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00317805 · Cited by 180
Cited by
Species of ticks and carried pathogens in owned dogs in Spain: results of a one-year national survey
Estrada-Peña, A., Roura, X., Sainz, A., Miró, G., & Solano-Gallego, L. (2017) · Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.ttbdis.2017.02.001 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Massei, G., Kindberg, J., Licoppe, A., Gačić, D., Šprem, N., Kamler, J., Baubet, E., Hohmann, U., Monaco, A., Ozoliņš, J., Cellina, S., Podgórski, T., Fonseca, C., Markov, N., Pokorny, B., Rosell, C., & Náhlik, A.
- Venue
- Pest Management Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-01-29
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 492-500
- ISSN
- 1526-498X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4998
- OpenAlex
- W1899411624
- Cited by
- 786
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 26.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ps.3965
- The paper
- Massei, G., Kindberg, J., Licoppe, A., Gačić, D., Šprem, N., Kamler, J., Baubet, E., Hohmann, U., Monaco, A., Ozoliņš, J., Cellina, S., Podgórski, T., Fonseca, C., Markov, N., Pokorny, B., Rosell, C., & Náhlik, A. (2015). Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe. Pest Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3965
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.