Cited by 29Avian ecology and behaviorWildlife Conservation and Criminology AnalysesWildlife Ecology and Conservation

The status and conservation of Galliformes in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam

Open access
Brickle, Nick W., Duckworth, J. W., Tordoff, Andrew W., Poole, Colin M., Timmins, Robert, McGowan, Philip J. K.·2008·Biodiversity and Conservation

Abstract

Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam form a diverse and important region for the order Galliformes with at least 21 species, comprising 10 pheasants, seven partridges, three quails and one francolin. Several are endemic to the region and several are considered globally threatened. Information was collated for each species on the Indochinese range, habitat use and conservation status. This information was used to determine gross patterns in conservation requirements, prioritised partly through the global importance of the Indochinese population. The galliform species at most immediate risk in Indochina is probably Green Peafowl, through heavy hunting exacerbated by increasing human access to former wildernesses. The endemic Edwards's Pheasant also merits specific conservation attention. Other forest species occur widely throughout surviving habitat, which remains landscape-scale despite serious losses in recent decades. Non-forest species, notably three quails (none endemic) remain very poorly known and threat levels cannot be assessed. For galliform conservation in Indochina by far the most important action is turning the existing declared protected areas networks into functional reality conserving a multitude of landscapes, each of hundreds of square kilometres, across the region. Past assessments of threat level to Indochinese forest Galliformes have been alarmist: many species are persisting in heavily-hunted fragments of the 10-50 sq. km size class, where many other forest vertebra…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10531-008-9346-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A sharp decline in advertisement calls in some former strongholds including Laos and Vietnam indicates the need for a new full assessment of R. ocellata's status and needs.

    “a sharp decline in advertisement calls in some former strongholds including both Laos (Brickle et al. 2008) and Vietnam (Gray et al. 2014) indicates the need for a new full assessment of its status and needs”

    From Species rank for Rheinardia ocellata nigrescens (Phasianidae) (2020) · cites this paper as Brickle et al. 2008

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brickle, N. W., Duckworth, J. W., Tordoff, A. W., Poole, C. M., Timmins, R., & McGowan, P. J. K.
Affiliations
  • Wildlife Conservation Society Indonesia (ID)
  • BirdLife International (KE)
  • Wildlife Conservation Society (US)
Corresponding author
Brickle, Nick W.
Venue
Biodiversity and Conservation
Published
2008-02-08
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
1393-1427
ISSN
  • 0960-3115 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9710
OpenAlex
W2140271612
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biodiversity and Conservation (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
Galliformes, pheasants, partridges, quail, francolins, conservation status, threatened species, green peafowl, habitat use, hunting pressure, protected area network, forest fragmentation, Indochina, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, endemic species

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review