Species rank for Rheinardia ocellata nigrescens (Phasianidae)
Open accessAbstract
Crested Argus Rheinardia ocellata has two highly disjunct populations in Vietnam and Lao PDR (nominate ocellata) and Malaysia (subspecies nigrescens). When evidence from the small sample of museum specimens is supplemented by novel photographic and acoustic evidence, Malaysian nigrescens proves to be distinct on a suite of characters: yellower bill with blackish nares, buffier supercilium, throat and breast, different-coloured and -structured crest, different-patterned upperparts and tail, a purer, more fluent, longer, lower Short Call (used by advertising males), markedly divergent from the explosive, nasal, double-noted equivalent in nominate ocellata, and a higher number of loud notes in the Long Call including an unexplained bimodal vs. unimodal pattern (hence either average 8.6 or 14.5 vs. 7.1 loud notes per call). In combination these characters indicate a level of differentiation compatible with species rank for nigrescens, and this is strongly reflected in Tobias criteria scoring. The conservation of the two forms requires urgent reconsideration.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper argues that the Malaysian Crested Argus *Rheinardia ocellata nigrescens* should be treated as a species distinct from Vietnamese/Lao *R. ocellata* based on museum morphology, photographs/video, and vocalizations. Using Tobias criteria, the authors report a total score of 14, double the threshold for species rank.
Key findings
- Museum skins alone yielded a Tobias score of 8, sufficient for species status; adding crest display and vocal differences brought the total to 14.
- Morphometrics showed *nigrescens* slightly larger overall, with no overlap in tarsus or wing: tarsus mean 96 mm (92–100) vs. 88 mm (86–91), wing mean 366 mm (355–377) vs. 339 mm (333–350); crest mean 100 mm (89–110) vs. 79 mm (62–92).
- Short Call differed: *nigrescens* was longer (mean 1.62 vs. 1.27 s), lower-pitched (mean max. frequency 1,238 Hz vs. 1,625 Hz), and had 1 note vs. 2 notes.
- Long Call loud notes differed: captive male *ocellata* mean 7.12 notes (n = 109 calls), captive female *ocellata* mean 6.74 (n = 42), wild unsexed *nigrescens* mean 11.6 (n = 22); *nigrescens* was bimodal, with means of 8.6 (n = 11) and 14.5 (n = 11) notes per call. Kruskal–Wallis tests were highly significant (χ² = 37.889, p < 0.001; and χ² = 41.976, p < 0.001 for four groups).
Methods
- Morphological study: inspected specimens at AMNH and NHMUK, compared plumage, and measured six full-tailed adult male *nigrescens* and nine full-tailed adult male *ocellata* for bill, crest, tarsus, wing, and tail; also examined photographs and video of captive/wild birds.
- Vocal study: gathered sound recordings, made digital recordings of more than 20 captive nominate *ocellata* in Saigon Zoo and wild *nigrescens* at Gunung Rabong Forest Reserve, Malaysia, between 2015 and 2019; analyzed sonograms with CoolEdit Pro and Raven Pro 1.5.
- Taxonomic assessment: applied Tobias et al. (2010) scoring criteria to plumage, dimensions, and voice, with effect sizes for biometric characters assessed using Cohen’s d.
Limitations
- The paper states morphometric sample sizes were too small for statistical analysis, and the three Short Call recordings were too few to calculate effect sizes.
- The paper states Long Call data for *nigrescens* came from unsexed wild individuals not under visual observation, soft preliminary notes were not heard in *nigrescens*, and the Sharp Call was heard only once in the wild from *nigrescens*.
- The paper notes that *ocellata* calls analyzed were mainly from captive individuals while *nigrescens* calls were from wild birds, but argues non-passerine vocalizations are not learnt; it also states Kruskal–Wallis is not powerful and larger sample sizes could improve statistical treatment. Evident from the text: no molecular data were available, and the bimodal Long Call pattern in *nigrescens* is unexplained.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
2 of 31 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation
In Malaysia the bulk of the R. nigrescens population lies within the boundaries of Taman Negara National Park.
“in Malaysia the bulk of the R. nigrescens population lies within the boundaries of Taman Negara National Park (Mamat & Yasak 1998, Liang et al. 2018)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Mamat & Yasak 1998 source
- cites Liang et al. 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
In Rothschild's first character (darker wings and tail), we could not see 'chestnut-rufous mottlings instead of dark brown'.
“in his first character (darker wings and tail) we could not see 'chestnut-rufous mottlings instead of dark brown'”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rothschild 1902
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
In Rothschild's eighth character (stouter bill), we could detect no obvious distinction.
“in his eighth (stouter bill) we could detect no obvious distinction”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rothschild 1902
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
Our review of specimen material confirms the diagnosis of nigrescens by Rothschild (1902).
“Ourreview of specimen material confirms the diagnosis of nigrescens by Rothschild (1902), with the exceptions that in his first character (darker wings and tail) we could not see 'chestnut-rufous mottlings instead of dark brown' and in his eighth (stouter bill) we could detect no obvious distinction (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rothschild 1902
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
The known part of the nigrescens Long Call is a single introductory whistled note that morphs into a series of 8-17 very loud inflected disyllabic notes.
“The known part of the call is a single introductory whistled note that morphs into a series of 8-17 very loud inflected disyllabic notes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Field descriptions of Long Call and Sharp Call of nigrescens are reliable enough for comparison despite not being digitally recorded.
- Findingown data
The whistled note of nigrescens Short Call starts on a flat pitch, followed by a quavering middle part and ends again at about stable pitch.
“The whistled note starts on a flat pitch, followed by a quavering middle part and ends again at about stable pitch.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The Long Call is given by both sexes of nominate ocellata.
“This call is given by both sexes of nominate ocellata (Fig. 9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Numbers of notes from nigrescens-1 and nigrescens-2 were significantly different from those of ocellata females and ocellata males (Dunn's pairwise tests; Bonferroni corrected p < 0.05).
“with the numbers of notes from nigrescens-1 and nigrescens-2 significantly different from those of ocellata females and ocellata males (Dunn's pairwise tests; Bonferroni corrected p<0.05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Our observations demonstrate that the Short Call, delivered by males at their display sites, differs in structure between R. nigrescens and R. ocellata.
“Our observations demonstrate that the Short Call, delivered by males at their display sites (Davison 1978), differs in structure between R. nigrescens and R. ocellata.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davison 1978
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The forms and types of calls of R. ocellata were not, or not greatly, affected by captive conditions.
- Findingown data
Male nigrescens has a lower-pitched Short Call (mean max. frequency 1,238 Hz vs. 1,625 Hz) than nominate ocellata.
“Sonograms were made of these calls and measurements of them reveal that male nigrescens has a longer (mean 1.62 vs. 1.27 seconds) but lower-pitched call (mean max.frequency 1,238 Hz vs. 1,625 Hz; Table 2)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Vocalisations of captive nominate ocellata are representative of wild nominate ocellata.
- Findingnone given
The Long Call of nominate ocellata starts with a series, often prolonged over several minutes, of up to several hundred very soft notes that can be heard only from a few metres away and detected visually by slight throat movements, before suddenly transitioning into very loud disyllabic notes, usually c.5-9 in a series delivered with wide open bill and straining hyoids.
“It starts with a series, often prolonged over several minutes, of up to several hundred very soft notes that can be heard only from a few metres away and detected visually by slight throat movements, before suddenly transitioning into very loud disyllabic notes, usually c.5-9 in a series delivered with wide open bill and straining hyoids.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The distribution of loud notes in nigrescens was arguably bimodal, with 11 calls containing 7-10 loud notes, and 11 containing 12-17 loud notes.
“However, the distribution of loud notes in nigrescens was arguably bimodal, with 11 calls containing 7-10 loud notes, and 11 containing 12-17 loud notes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The unsexed wild nigrescens sample is not biased by sex in a way that affects number of loud notes in Long Call.
- Findingown data
Long Calls by captive female ocellata ranged from three to 12 loud notes per call with a mean of 6.74 (n = 42 calls).
“Long Calls by captive female ocellata ranged from three to 12 loud notes per call with a mean of 6.74 (n = 42 calls).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Vocalisations of captive nominate ocellata are representative of wild nominate ocellata.
- Findingown data
Long Calls by captive male ocellata involved 4-11 loud notes per call (preliminary soft notes not counted) with a mean of 7.12 (n = 109 calls).
“Long Calls by captive male ocellata involved 4-11 loud notes per call (preliminary soft notes not counted) with a mean of 7.12 (n = 109 calls).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Vocalisations of captive nominate ocellata are representative of wild nominate ocellata.
- Findingown data
Both taxa possess three loud call types: Short Call, Long Call and Sharp Call.
“Fromthe recorded and published material available to us we find both taxa possess three loud call types, which we term Short Call, Long Call and Sharp Call.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The crest is proportionately longer in nigrescens.
“but the crest is proportionately longer in nigrescens and the colour and shape differences are evident in display”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Long Call and Sharp Call are given by both sexes.
“The Long Call and Sharp Call are given by both sexes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The total Tobias score for R. nigrescens reaches 14, double the threshold the criteria set for species rank.
“The total Tobias score for R. nigrescens reaches a relatively high 14 (double the threshold the criteria set for species rank)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The forms and types of calls of R. ocellata were not, or not greatly, affected by captive conditions.
- Findingnone given
Sharp Call notes are delivered at less regularly spaced intervals than notes in the Long Call.
“and these are delivered at less regularly spaced intervals than notes in the Long Call.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a highly significant difference between all four groups (χ2 = 41.976, p < 0.001).
“A Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a highly significant difference between all four groups (χ 2 = 41.976,p<0.001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The difference in crest colour and length is striking when the crest is being raised, as their movement causes the long spiky feathers of nigrescens to scatter outwards.
“The difference in crest colour and length is striking when the crest is being raised, as their movement causes the long spiky feathers of nigrescens to scatter outwards (J.Corder, video).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Male nigrescens has a longer Short Call (mean 1.62 vs. 1.27 seconds) than nominate ocellata.
“Sonograms were made of these calls and measurements of them reveal that male nigrescens has a longer (mean 1.62 vs. 1.27 seconds) but lower-pitched call (mean max.frequency 1,238 Hz vs. 1,625 Hz; Table 2)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Vocalisations of captive nominate ocellata are representative of wild nominate ocellata.
- Premisecitation
The only close comparison between the two taxa was made at the time of the description of nigrescens nearly 120 years ago.
“and the only close comparison between them was made at the time of the description of nigrescens nearly 120 years ago.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rothschild 1902
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
All subsequent authorities down to the four current world lists have followed Rothschild in treating nigrescens as a subspecies of R. ocellata.
“All subsequent authorities (e.g.Peters 1934, Delacour 1951, McGowan 1994, Johnsgard 1999, Hennache & Ottaviani 2005) down to the four current world lists (del Hoyo & Collar 2014, Christidis et al. 2018, Clements et al. 2019, Gill et al. 2020) have followed Rothschild in treating nigrescens as a subspecies of R. ocellata.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Peters 1934
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Delacour 1951
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites McGowan 1994
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Under Tobias criteria, if assessing difference between calls in constituent elements, a score of 1 may be allowed for the more inflected loud note in nigrescens, 1 for the introductory wooo, and 2 for the greater number and bimodal nature of the loud notes per call, yielding a vocal character score of 4.
“if we assess the difference between these calls in terms of their constituent elements, we might allow a score of 1 for the more inflected loud note in nigrescens, 1 for the introductory wooo, and 2 for the greater number and bimodal nature of the loud notes per call, yielding a score for this vocal character of [ns]4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The forms and types of calls of R. ocellata were not, or not greatly, affected by captive conditions.
- Interpretationown data
A biological difference is evident between ocellata and unsexed nigrescens in Long Call notes.
“A biological difference is evident between ocellata (difference between males and females of only 0.38 in mean number of notes per Long Call, and unimodal distribution of call notes within a large sample of males) vs. unsexed nigrescens (two non-overlapping categories of Long Call, and more notes on average in both these categories than in male and female ocellata).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The forms and types of calls of R. ocellata were not, or not greatly, affected by captive conditions.
- Interpretationown data
The evidence suggests that the longer tarsus of nigrescens might involve a Tobias score of 2.
“but the evidence suggests that the longer tarsus of nigrescens might involve a score of 2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The species is listed as Endangered on the IUCN Red List.
“it is listed as Endangered on the IUCN Red List (BirdLife International 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites BirdLife International 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductnone given
The sample sizes are too small to subject to statistical analysis.
“The sample sizes are too small to subject to statistical analysis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Based on absence of fear behaviour among all birds before and during the call, the Sharp Call is not necessarily an alarm call.
“Based on the absence of fear behaviour among all birds before and during the call, it is not necessarily an alarm call.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Forebrain areas similar to song control areas of oscine passerines, some parrots and hummingbirds are lacking in various suboscine passerines, owls, doves, gulls and gallinaceous species that do not learn vocalisations.
“Forebrain areas that are similar in morphological appearance, location and connectivity to the song control areas of oscine passerines (songbirds), some parrots and hummingbirds are lacking in various suboscine passerines, owls, doves, gulls and gallinaceous species (Gahr 2000) that do not learn vocalisations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gahr 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Using Tobias et al. (2010) criteria, museum skins alone provide a sufficiently high score (8) to indicate that R. nigrescens and R. ocellata merit species status.
“Using the Tobias et al. (2010) criteria, museum skins alone provide a sufficiently high score (8) to indicate that R. nigrescens and R. ocellata merit species status.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tobias et al. (2010) source
- Premisecitation
In general non-passerine vocalisations are not learnt.
“In general non-passerine vocalisations are not learnt.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gahr 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
A sharp decline in advertisement calls in some former strongholds including Laos and Vietnam indicates the need for a new full assessment of R. ocellata's status and needs.
“a sharp decline in advertisement calls in some former strongholds including both Laos (Brickle et al. 2008) and Vietnam (Gray et al. 2014) indicates the need for a new full assessment of its status and needs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
- May combine two claims. 50
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 13
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe three recordings are too few to calculate effect sizes; for example, the methodology of Isler et al. (1998) requires calculation of percentiles in the t-distribution of measurements drawn from a sample of vocalisations.
“The three recordings are too few to calculate effect sizes; for example, the methodology of Isler et al. (1998) requires calculation of percentiles in the t-distribution of measurements drawn from a sample of vocalisations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Isler et al. 1998 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSupercilium in nigrescens is buff vs. stony white in ocellata, usually broader and stronger, and contrasts more strongly with the blacker crown and face (Tobias score at least 2).
“1. supercilium buff vs. stony white, usually broader and stronger, and contrasting more strongly with the blacker crown and 'face' (area around eye and on ear-coverts) (Fig. 1a,b; score at least 2);”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationNareal area in nigrescens is blackish, adjacent area of bill distal to nares rosy, rest of bill yellowish horn with a paler tip and cutting edge, vs. bill including all but the base of the nareal area rosy pink, slightly paler at the tip, deeper pink above and behind the nostril (score 3).
“2. nareal area blackish, adjacent area of bill (distal to nares) rosy (as noted in Ogilvie-Grant 1908), rest of bill yellowish horn with a paler tip and cutting edge vs. bill including all but the base of the nareal area rosy pink”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenTheir respective Long Calls also differ in structure, in number of notes, and probably in the degree of difference between males and females.
“Their respective Long Calls also differ in structure, in number of notes, and probably in the degree of difference between males and females.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The forms and types of calls of R. ocellata were not, or not greatly, affected by captive conditions.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataLong Calls by captive male ocellata had a unimodal distribution, with 74% of calls containing 6-8 loud notes.
“They had a unimodal distribution, with 74% of calls containing 6-8 loud notes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Vocalisations of captive nominate ocellata are representative of wild nominate ocellata.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhen erected, the crest of male nigrescens forms a very spiky pure white radiating mass of untidy feathers, while the long black feathers that lie over the white ones when at rest are projected far forward, overhanging the forehead and bill, apparently straightening under their own weight.
“When erected, the crest of male nigrescens forms a very spiky pure white radiating mass of untidy feathers, while the long black feathers that lie over the white ones when at rest are projected far forward, overhanging the forehead and bill, apparently straightening under their own weight (Fig. 4a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe tail of nigrescens averages slightly shorter than ocellata.
“The tail of nigrescens averages slightly shorter, but this is almost certainly an effect of sample size:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere is very little overlap in length of crest between taxa, which shows much the greatest degree of difference between means.
“There is also very little overlap in length of crest, which shows much the greatest degree of difference between means (Table 1);”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLong Calls by unsexed wild nigrescens ranged from seven to 17 loud notes per call, with a mean of 11.6 (n = 22 calls), and were therefore longer on average than Long Calls of ocellata, with nine (41%) of the nigrescens calls containing more loud notes (13-17) than any ocellata Long Call (max.12 loud notes, from a female).
“Long Calls by unsexed wild nigrescens ranged from seven to 17 loud notes per call, with a mean of 11.6 (n = 22 calls), and were therefore longer on average than Long Calls of ocellata, with nine (41%) of the nigrescens calls containing more loud notes (13-17) than any ocellata Long Call (max.12 loud notes, from a female).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The unsexed wild nigrescens sample is not biased by sex in a way that affects number of loud notes in Long Call.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningIn nigrescens soft preliminary notes have not been heard, but if present they would not have been detected because of distance in the field.
“In nigrescens soft preliminary notes have not been heard, but if present they would not have been detected because of distance in the field.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Short Call of ocellata is very similar to allopatric Argusianus argus, while the Short Call in nigrescens (sympatric with A. argus but separated by elevation) is quite different.
“the Short Call of ocellata is very similar to allopatric Argusianus argus, while the Short Call in nigrescens (sympatric with A. argus but separated by elevation) is quite different”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The forms and types of calls of R. ocellata were not, or not greatly, affected by captive conditions.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhen repeated, the Short Call of nigrescens can be with a distinct interval of a few seconds between calls, or as a rolling uninterrupted sequence.
“When repeated, which is often when responding to extraneous sounds such as gibbons, hornbills, thunder or tree-falls, it can be with a distinct interval of a few seconds between calls, or as a rolling uninterrupted sequence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough the volume of individual Sharp Call notes can increase over the series, there are no distinct soft preliminary notes and no sudden transition to very loud notes.
“Although the volume of the individual notes can increase over the series, there are no distinct soft preliminary notes, and no sudden transition to very loud notes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLong Calls by captive female ocellata almost had a unimodal distribution, with 81% of calls containing 5-9 loud notes.
“They almost had a unimodal distribution, with 81% of calls containing 5-9 loud notes (slightly fewer calls with six than with five or seven loud notes).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Vocalisations of captive nominate ocellata are representative of wild nominate ocellata.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Sharp Call is quieter and higher pitched than the Long Call.
“but it is quieter and higher pitched”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Sharp Call consists of more notes than the Long Call, with a variable number from 12 up to 191 heard.
“and consists of more notes (but a more variable number, from 12 up to 191 heard)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Short Call is given by males at or near display sites, apparently in advertisement, and as far as is known it is not given by females.
“The Short Call is given by males at or near display sites, apparently in advertisement, and as far as is known it is not given by females.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe Sharp Call is similar to the Long Call only in that it consists of a series of notes.
“It is similar to the Long Call only in that it consists of a series of notes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn morphometrics, nigrescens emerges slightly larger overall, with no overlap in tarsus or wing.
“In morphometrics nigrescens emerges slightly larger overall, with no overlap in tarsus or wing (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe crest of male ocellata forms a fluffy, bouffant powderpuff of golden-buff feathers, while the short brown feathers project above the forehead and in profile view form a short rounded curl.
“Contrastingly, the crest of male ocellata forms a fluffy, bouffant powderpuff of golden-buff feathers, while the short brown feathers project above the forehead and in profile view form a short rounded curl (Fig. 4b; also Seth-Smith 1932, Huxley 1941).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSharp Call notes are each much shorter than those of the Long Call and appear on a sonogram as an inverted U shape.
“The notes are each much shorter than those of the Long Call, and appear on a sonogram as an inverted U shape.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataInner vanes of largest rectrices in nigrescens have dull matt rufous-orange background on which white spots are inset in broad grey rings, vs. grey background with rufous-orange contracting to islands between white spots (ns[2]).
“6. inner vanes of the largest rectrices with dull matt rufous-orange background on which white spots are inset in broad grey rings, vs. with grey background, the dull matt rufous-orange contracting to islands between the white spots (Fig.6a,b; ns[2]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOccipital crest in nigrescens points directly backwards rather than tending to spread laterally, with much longer and coarser filoplumes, and consists of two colours: sparse elongate black feathers above 5-10 times as many much longer white feathers, vs. soft, decurving sooty-brown feathers shading to rufous-tinged brown then creamy white (score 3).
“4. occipital crest pointing directly backwards rather than tending to spread laterally, in museum skins, with much longer and coarser filoplumes (lacking the fluffiness of the nominate), and consisting of two colours in different proportions, namely a relatively sparse number of elongate black feathers positioned above 5-10 times as many much longer white feathers, vs. soft, decurving sooty-brown”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOne nigrescens specimen (NHMUK 1903.5.1.1) has a tail of 1,642 mm, far longer than the next longest, an ocellata (NHMUK 1928.6.26.98) at 1,494 mm.
“and in fact one nigrescens (NHMUK 1903.5.1.1)has a tail of 1,642 mm, far longer than the next longest, an ocellata (NHMUK 1928.6.26.98) at 1,494 mm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe very soft preliminary notes in ocellata Long Call are delivered at a rate of c.1 per second, and each lasts approximately 0.4 seconds.
“The very soft preliminary notes are delivered at a rate of c.1 per second, and each lasts approximately 0.4 seconds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEach Sharp Call note lasts less than 0.5 seconds and is delivered at roughly 1.5-2.0 second intervals, sometimes with pauses.
“Each note lasts less than 0.5 seconds and is delivered at roughly 1.5-2.0second-intervals, sometimes with pauses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a highly significant difference between the three groups (χ2 = 37.889, p<0.001), with number of notes from nigrescens significantly different from those of ocellata females (Dunn's pairwise test; Bonferroni corrected p<0.001) and ocellata males (p<0.001).
“A Kruskal-Wallis test revealed that there was a highly significant difference between the three groups (χ 2 = 37.889, p<0.001), with number of notes from nigrescens significantly different from those of ocellata females (Dunn's pairwise test; Bonferroni corrected p<0.001) and ocellata males (p<0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Vocalisations of captive nominate ocellata are representative of wild nominate ocellata.
- Rests on an assumption: The unsexed wild nigrescens sample is not biased by sex in a way that affects number of loud notes in Long Call.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Short Call of nigrescens consists of a diagnostic single continuous whistle on level pitch followed by quavering modulations, vs. two emphasised overslurred notes in ocellata.
“consisting of a diagnostic single continuous whistle on level pitch followed by quavering modulations, vs. two emphasised overslurred notes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Vocalisations of captive nominate ocellata are representative of wild nominate ocellata.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn nigrescens, the Short Call is a rather pure whistled whuuhuhHUhuuu, sounding less forceful and delivered fluently in one breath at fairly consistent amplitude, resembling a protracted single note with different internal emphases.
“In nigrescens (Fig. 8a,b) the Short Call is a rather pure whistled whuuhuhHUhuuu, sounding less forceful and delivered fluently in one breath at fairly consistent amplitude, hence resembling a protracted single note with different internal emphases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhite spots on the blacker body and wings of nigrescens are much more distinct, smaller and fewer, more widely spaced and more linearly arranged compared to dense buffy-white speckling of nominate (ns[2]).
“5. white spots on the blacker body and wings much more distinct, being smaller and fewer (hence more widely spaced) and more linearly arranged compared to the dense buffy-white speckling of the nominate (Fig. 5a,b; ns[2]);”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhite of throat in nigrescens is more contrasting, buffier and more extensive, vs. a less striking greyish white shading quickly into a dull rufous-brown lower neck (ns[2]).
“3. white of throat more contrasting, buffier (in an echo of the supercilium differences) and more extensive, vs. a less striking greyish white shading quickly into a dull rufousbrown lower neck”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn unsexed nigrescens, there are two non-overlapping categories of Long Call, and both categories have more notes on average than male and female ocellata.
“two non-overlapping categories of Long Call, and more notes on average in both these categories than in male and female ocellata”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The forms and types of calls of R. ocellata were not, or not greatly, affected by captive conditions.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMeans of loud notes per call for nigrescens-1 and nigrescens-2 are 8.6 (n = 11) and 14.5 (n = 11), respectively.
“their means are (nigrescens-1) 8.6 (n = 11) vs. (nigrescens-2) 14.5 (n = 11) loud notes per call.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenA seemingly identical Sharp Call has been heard only once in the wild from nigrescens, but at a distance and was not attributable to sex.
“A seemingly identical Sharp Call has been heard only once in the wild from nigrescens, but at a distance and was not attributable to sex.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn ocellata, the difference between males and females in mean number of notes per Long Call is only 0.38, and the distribution of call notes within a large sample of males is unimodal.
“difference between males and females of only 0.38 in mean number of notes per Long Call, and unimodal distribution of call notes within a large sample of males”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The forms and types of calls of R. ocellata were not, or not greatly, affected by captive conditions.
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn nominate ocellata, the Short Call is a loud, explosive, slightly nasal woOh-WAWh delivered as two clearly separated and equally accentuated notes; the first note is slightly rising, the second overslurred and reaches a higher maximum pitch.
“In nominate ocellata (Fig. 7a,b) this call is a loud, explosive, slightly nasal woOh-WAWh delivered as two clearly separated and equally accentuated notes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe series of rising whistles in ocellata Long Call, each lasting c.1 second, often gradually increases in pitch, every whistle reaching a slightly higher frequency than the previous one.
“This series of rising whistles, each of which lasts c.1 second, often gradually increases in pitch, every whistle reaching a slightly higher frequency than the previous one.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Short Call in nigrescens is typically given once per calling bout, but has been heard repeated up to eight times in succession.
“It is typically given once per calling bout, but has been heard repeated up to eight times in succession.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningNine points of distinction is a relatively large number for a taxon being described as a subspecies, and suggests a level of divergence worthy of reassessment.
“Nine points of distinction is a relatively large number for a taxon being described as a subspecies, and certainly suggests a level of divergence worthy of reassessment in the light of modern taxonomic trends.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationRheinardia ocellata has two highly disjunct populations: nominate ocellata in Vietnam and Lao PDR and subspecies nigrescens in peninsular Malaysia.
“Crested Argus Rheinardia ocellata has two highly disjunct populations in Vietnam and Lao PDR (nominate ocellata) and Malaysia (subspecies nigrescens).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDifferences between the two taxa have never been considered particularly strong, but were mentioned as a topic needing examination.
“Differences between the two taxa have never been considered particularly strong, but mentioned as a topic that needs examining (Liang et al. 2018)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liang et al. 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe two taxa are disjunct by more than 1,000 km in a direct line (1,800 km by the shortest present-day land route) and lie in two biogeographically distinct provinces within the Oriental region, in mainland Indochina and on the Sunda Shelf.
“Nevertheless, the two taxa are disjunct by more than 1,000 km in a direct line (1,800 km by the shortest present-day land route), and they lie in two biogeographically distinct provinces within the Oriental region, in mainland Indochina and on the Sunda Shelf (Whitmore 1984, Sterling & Hurley 2008, Corlett 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe calls of R. ocellata analysed here were mainly from captive individuals, and those of R. nigrescens were made by wild birds.
“The calls of R. ocellata analysed here were mainly from captive individuals, and those of R. nigrescens were made by wild birds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationcitationThe shorter average tail of nigrescens is almost certainly an effect of sample size, because tails in Rheinardia possibly increase in length with age.
“tails in Rheinardia possibly increase in length with age (McGowan 1994)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McGowan 1994
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTo the museum-skin score can be added the distinctive appearance and deportment of the crest, a significant display feature, and considerable differences in advertising calls, totalling 6.
“To that we are able to add the distinctive appearance and deportment of the crest, a significant display feature, and considerable differences in advertising calls (totalling 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The forms and types of calls of R. ocellata were not, or not greatly, affected by captive conditions.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn Vietnam R. ocellata occurs in several protected and proposed protected areas such as Bach Ma National Park, Ngoc Linh Nature Reserve and Song Thanh Nature Reserve, all in Quang Nam province, and Khe Nuoc Trong Proposed Nature Reserve, Quang Binh province.
“In Vietnam R. ocellata occurs in several protected and proposed protected areas such as Bach Ma National Park, Ngoc Linh Nature Reserve and Song Thanh Nature Reserve, all in Quang Nam province, and Khe Nuoc Trong Proposed Nature Reserve, Quang Binh province (Gray et al. 2014, Vũ et al. 2017a,b, Vu & Tran 2020)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn nominate ocellata all three calls have been sound-recorded; in nigrescens only the Short Call has been digitally recorded while the other two have written descriptions based on field experience.
“In nominate ocellata all three calls have been sound-recorded; in nigrescens only the Short Call has been digitally recorded while the other two have written descriptions based on experience in the field.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Field descriptions of Long Call and Sharp Call of nigrescens are reliable enough for comparison despite not being digitally recorded.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Tobias et al. (2010) scoring system sets a threshold of 7 for species status, with character scores 4 exceptional, 3 major, 2 medium, 1 minor; only three plumage, two vocal, two biometric and one behavioural/ecological character may be counted.
“a threshold of 7 is set to allow species status, species status cannot be triggered by minor characters alone, and only three plumage characters, two vocal characters, two biometric characters (assessed for effect size using Cohen's d where 0.2-2 is minor, 2-5 medium, 5-10 major and >10 exceptional) and one behavioural or ecological character (allowed 1) may be counted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tobias et al. 2010 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThey applied Dunn's pairwise test and Bonferroni correction, considering these a reasonable option given the non-normal distribution and different sizes of samples.
“we also applied Dunn's pairwise test and Bonferroni correction, considering these a reasonable option given the non-normal distribution and different sizes of samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGiven this is a very stereotypic call (heard >100 times in various field situations but not recorded, and immediately recognisable), we can confidently estimate Tobias scores for the three differences to reach respectively 2 (for length), [ns]2 (for pitch) and 4 (for 1 vs. 2 notes), resulting in a total score for this vocal character of 6.
“However, given this is a very stereotypic call (heard >100 times in various field situations but not recorded, and immediately recognisable), we can confidently estimate Tobias scores for the three differences to reach respectively 2 (for length), [ns]2 (for pitch) and 4 (for 1 vs. 2 notes), resulting in a total score for this vocal character of 6.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Vocalisations of captive nominate ocellata are representative of wild nominate ocellata.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe voice of nigrescens evolved to differentiate it from A. argus, while ocellata retained more ancestral features.
“suggesting that the voice of nigrescens evolved to differentiate it from A. argus, while ocellata retained more ancestral features.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The forms and types of calls of R. ocellata were not, or not greatly, affected by captive conditions.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOutside Galliformes, African Houbara and Asian Houbara differ significantly in feather deportment and pattern in display, including crest, as well as number of call notes.
“two species that look extremely similar at rest but which differ significantly in feather deportment and pattern in display, including the crest, as well as in the number of call notes (Collar & Combreau 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Collar & Combreau 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIn combination these characters indicate a level of differentiation compatible with species rank for nigrescens, and this is strongly reflected in Tobias criteria scoring.
“In combination these characters indicate a level of differentiation compatible with species rank for nigrescens, and this is strongly reflected in Tobias criteria scoring.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tobias et al. 2010 source
- Rests on an assumption: Vocalisations of captive nominate ocellata are representative of wild nominate ocellata.
- Rests on an assumption: Field descriptions of Long Call and Sharp Call of nigrescens are reliable enough for comparison despite not being digitally recorded.
- Rests on an assumption: The unsexed wild nigrescens sample is not biased by sex in a way that affects number of loud notes in Long Call.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese are based on field notes from a broad area of forest covering at least three separate mountain flanks, and therefore unlikely to reflect individual call differences between two birds.
“These are based on field notes from a broad area of forest covering at least three separate mountain flanks, and therefore unlikely to reflect individual call differences between two birds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The unsexed wild nigrescens sample is not biased by sex in a way that affects number of loud notes in Long Call.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningOur recognition of R. nigrescens as a species distinct from R. ocellata is likely to have several conservation implications.
“Our recognition of what we propose to call Malaysian Crested Argus R. nigrescens as a species distinct from Vietnamese Crested Argus R. ocellata is likely to have several conservation implications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Vocalisations of captive nominate ocellata are representative of wild nominate ocellata.
“we made our own digital recordings of more than 20 captive birds of nominate ocellata in Saigon Zoo, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, predominantly in April-May and November, and of wild nigrescens at Gunung Rabong Forest Reserve, Kelantan, Malaysia, over the same period”
The paper relies on this without support.
Field descriptions of Long Call and Sharp Call of nigrescens are reliable enough for comparison despite not being digitally recorded.
“in nigrescens only the Short Call has been digitally recorded while the other two have written descriptions based on experience in the field”
The paper relies on this without support.
The unsexed wild nigrescens sample is not biased by sex in a way that affects number of loud notes in Long Call.
“Long Calls by unsexed wild nigrescens ranged from seven to 17 loud notes per call, with a mean of 11.6 (n = 22 calls)”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The forms and types of calls of R. ocellata were not, or not greatly, affected by captive conditions.
“These are reasons to suppose that the forms and types of calls of R. ocellata were not, or not greatly, affected by captive conditions; the validity of this assumption was further affirmed by comparing our recordings with the few available of ocellata in the wild (AV7666, XC69377, BLNS46837).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Short Call recording count conflicts with Table 2
MinorThe text says there are three recordings, but Table 2 lists four Short Call recordings-two for each taxon.
“The three recordings are too few to calculate effect sizes;”
“| Recording no. (see Appendix) | ML273908 | AV7666 | ML273907 | ML273906 |”
Cites
Quantitative criteria for species delimitation
TOBIAS, J. A., SEDDON, N., SPOTTISWOODE, C. N., PILGRIM, J. D., FISHPOOL, L. D. C., & COLLAR, N. J. (2010) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.2010.01051.x · Cited by 1,092 · see citing works
Self-citationUse of Vocalizations to Establish Species Limits in Antbirds (Passeriformes: Thamnophilidae)
Isler, M. L., Isler, P. R., & Whitney, B. M. (1998) · The Auk · doi:10.2307/4089407 · Cited by 228 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The three recordings are too few to calculate effect sizes; for example, the methodology of Isler et al. (1998) requires calculation of percentiles in the t-distribution of measurements drawn from a sample of vocalisations.”
The Ecology of Tropical East Asia
Corlett, R. T. (2014) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681341.001.0001 · Cited by 227 · cited 1× · see citing works
“ISSN-2513-9894 (Online) distinct provinces within the Oriental region, in mainland Indochina and on the Sunda Shelf (Whitmore 1984, Sterling & Hurley 2008, Corlett 2014).”
BackgroundThe status and conservation of Galliformes in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam
Brickle, N. W., Duckworth, J. W., Tordoff, A. W., Poole, C. M., Timmins, R., & McGowan, P. J. K. (2008) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-008-9346-z · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Gordon, M., & O'Neill, W. E. (2000) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/1096-9861(20001016)426:2 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Species delimitation in the C hinese bamboo partridge B ambusicola thoracica ( P hasianidae; A ves)
Hung, C., Hung, H., Yeh, C., Fu, Y., Chen, D., Lei, F., Yao, C., Yao, C., Yang, X., Lai, Y., et al. (2014) · Zoologica Scripta · doi:10.1111/zsc.12071 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Bayesian occupancy monitoring for Annamite endemic biodiversity in central Vietnam
Gray, T. N. E., Nguyen Quang, H. A., & Nguyen Van, T. (2014) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-014-0685-7 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Donegan, T. (2018) · ZooKeys · doi:10.3897/zookeys.757.10965 · Cited by 15 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Donegan (2018) assessed strengths and weaknesses of the method.”
BackgroundVu, T. T., & Tran, D. V. (2020) · Journal for Nature Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125843 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Kelantan and my trip to Gunong Tahan
Waterstradt, J. (1902) · Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15966396 · Cited by 8
Mamat, I. H., & Yasak, M. N. (1998) · Bird Conservation International · doi:10.1017/s0959270900002094 · Cited by 5 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Fortunately, in Malaysia the bulk of the R. nigrescens population lies within the boundaries of Taman Negara National Park (Mamat & Yasak 1998, Liang et al. 2018), but no uninhabited area with a long boundary that is difficult to patrol can be considered totally secure.”
BackgroundWhitmore, T. C. (1984) · Applied Geography · doi:10.1016/0143-6228(84)90008-0 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
XVI.—Description of an apparently new species of Pheasant belonging to the genus Argus
Elliot, D. G. (1871) · Annals and Magazine of Natural History · doi:10.1080/00222937108696446 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The Display of Rheinart's Pheasant (Rheinardia ocellata).
Huxley, J. S., & Bond, F. W. (1942) · Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1942.tb08486.x · Cited by 2 · cited 1× · see citing works
“4b; also Seth-Smith 1932, Huxley 1941).”
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 16 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- A. Jeyarajasingam and A. Pearson "A field guide to the birds of peninsular Malaysia and Singapore." , (1999)
- Lord Medway and D.R. Wells "Birds of the Malay Peninsula, vol. 5." , (1976)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Impact of climate change on Southeast Asian natural habitats, with focus on protected areas
Namkhan, M., Sukumal, N., & Savini, T. (2022) · Global Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02293 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Nguyen, T., Vu, T. T., Nguyen, H. T., & Clink, D. J. (2025) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2024.0056 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
(2020) · Bulletin of the British Ornithologists Club · doi:10.25226/bboc.v140i4.2020.a12
Cynthia, E., Tjong, D. H., Roesma, D. I., et al. (2022) · Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity · doi:10.13057/biodiv/d230933
- Authors
- Davison, G. W. H., Boesman, P., Collar, N. J., & Puan, C. L.
- Affiliations
- National Parks Board (SG)
- Peter Boesman, Duinenweg 3, B-2820 Rijmenam, Belgium.
- Natural History Museum (GB)
- Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
- Venue
- Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club
- Publisher
- British Ornithologists' Club
- Published
- 2020-06-22
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 182
- ISSN
- 0007-1595 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4248896347
- Semantic Scholar
- 5e759da45f096dda9ad0d7f378283e011c321eac
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Bulletin of the British Ornithologists Club (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- American Museum of Natural History
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Orthoptera Research and Taxonomy
- Keywords
- species rank, subspecies status, morphological differentiation, long calls, disjunct populations, museum specimens, bird conservation, Phasianidae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review