The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does plantation forestry restore biodiversity or create green deserts? A synthesis of the effects of land-use transitions on plant species richness
Open accessAbstract
Plantations are established for a variety of reasons including wood production, soil and water conservation, and more recently, carbon sequestration. The effect of this growing land-use change on biodiversity, however, is poorly understood and considerable debate exists as to whether plantations are ‘green deserts’ or valuable habitat for indigenous flora and fauna. This paper synthesizes peer-reviewed articles that provide quantitative data on plant species richness in plantations and paired land uses, most often representative of pre-plantation land cover. The results of this synthesis suggest that the value of plantations for biodiversity varies considerably depending on whether the original land cover is grassland, shrubland, primary forest, secondary forest, or degraded or exotic pasture, and whether native or exotic tree species are planted. The results of this study suggest that plantations are most likely to contribute to biodiversity when established on degraded lands rather than replacing natural ecosystems, such as forests, grasslands, and shrublands, and when indigenous tree species are used rather than exotic species. These findings can help guide afforestation and reforestation programs, including those aimed at increasing terrestrial carbon sequestration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change
Rudel, T. K., Coomes, O. T., Moran, E., Achard, F., Angelsen, A., Xu, J., & Lambin, E. (2005) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.11.001 · Cited by 1,387
Lugo, A. E. (1992) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937169 · Cited by 361 · cited 2×
“…on previously forested lands, are generally expected to support higher levels of diversity given additional time to develop structural complexity (Lugo 1992; Munro et al. 2009), and favorable microclimates and litter and humus layers that are more conducive to native plant colonization…”
Background
Cited by
The role of soil carbon in natural climate solutions
Bossio, D. A., Cook-Patton, S. C., Ellis, P. W., Fargione, J., Sanderman, J., Smith, P., Wood, S., Zomer, R. J., von Unger, M., Emmer, I. M., et al. (2020) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0491-z · Cited by 1,273
Global Forest Transition: Prospects for an End to Deforestation
Meyfroidt, P., & Lambin, E. F. (2011) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-090710-143732 · Cited by 659
Natural climate solutions for the United States
Fargione, J. E., Bassett, S., Boucher, T., Bridgham, S. D., Conant, R. T., Cook-Patton, S. C., Ellis, P. W., Falcucci, A., Fourqurean, J. W., Gopalakrishna, T., et al. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat1869 · Cited by 588
Where Tree Planting and Forest Expansion are Bad for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
Veldman, J. W., Overbeck, G. E., Negreiros, D., Mahy, G., Le Stradic, S., Fernandes, G. W., Durigan, G., Buisson, E., Putz, F. E., & Bond, W. J. (2015) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biv118 · Cited by 531
The principles of natural climate solutions
Ellis, P. W., Page, A. M., Wood, S., Fargione, J., Masuda, Y. J., Carrasco Denney, V., Moore, C., Kroeger, T., Griscom, B., Sanderman, J., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-44425-2 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Bremer, L. L., & Farley, K. A.
- Venue
- Biodiversity and Conservation
- Published
- 2010-11-11
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 3893-3915
- ISSN
- 0960-3115 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9710
- OpenAlex
- W1991218065
- Cited by
- 685
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does plantation forestry restore biodiversity or create green deserts? A synthesis of the effects of land-use transitions on plant species richness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10531-010-9936-4
- The paper
- Bremer, L. L., & Farley, K. A. (2010). Does plantation forestry restore biodiversity or create green deserts? A synthesis of the effects of land-use transitions on plant species richness. Biodiversity and Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9936-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.