Cited by 531Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Where Tree Planting and Forest Expansion are Bad for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

Veldman, Joseph W., Overbeck, Gerhard E., Negreiros, Daniel, Mahy, Gregory, Le Stradic, Soizig, Fernandes, G. Wilson, Durigan, Giselda, Buisson, Elise +2 more·2015·BioScience

Abstract

Misperceptions about the world's grassy biomes contribute to their alarming rates of loss due to conversion for agriculture and tree plantations, as well as to forest encroachment. To illustrate the causes and consequences of these misperceptions, we show that the World Resources Institute and the International Union for Conservation of Nature misidentified 9 million square kilometers of ancient grassy biomes as providing “opportunities” for forest restoration. Establishment of forests in these grasslands, savannas, and open-canopy woodlands would devastate biodiversity and ecosystem services. Such undesired outcomes are avoidable if the distinct ecologies and conservation needs of forest and grassy biomes become better integrated into science and policy. To start with, scientists should create maps that accurately depict grassy biomes at global and landscape scales. It is also crucial that international environmental agreements (e.g., the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) formally recognize grassy biomes and their environmental values.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/biosci/biv118

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Forests planted in savannahs or other ecosystems with low tree cover will critically damage these often highly species-diverse and carbon-rich ecosystems.

    “Forests planted in savannahs or other ecosystems with low tree cover will critically damage these often highly species-diverse and carbon-rich ecosystems (113, 114).”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [113]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Veldman, J. W., Overbeck, G. E., Negreiros, D., Mahy, G., Le Stradic, S., Fernandes, G. W., Durigan, G., Buisson, E., Putz, F. E., & Bond, W. J.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Venue
BioScience
Published
2015-09-09
Volume
65
Issue
10
Pages
1011-1018
ISSN
  • 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3244
OpenAlex
W2254581607
Cited by
531
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 27
FWCI
18.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BioScience (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
savanna, tree planting, forest restoration, forest encroachment, biodiversity loss, ecosystem services, international environmental agreements, UNFCCC, conservation policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review